Hi, Is there a XML::Xerces 2.8.0 counterpart to xerces-c 2.8.0 ? XML::Xerces 2.7.0 (latest, afaict) refuses to compile against xerces-c 2.8.0. Alternatively, do I need to trick it to compile against the mismatching version ? Regards, Xavier
Hi Xavier, On 2/12/08, Xavier Bachelot <xavier <at> bachelot.org> wrote: > Is there a XML::Xerces 2.8.0 counterpart to xerces-c 2.8.0 ? > XML::Xerces 2.7.0 (latest, afaict) refuses to compile against xerces-c > 2.8.0. Alternatively, do I need to trick it to compile against the > mismatching version ? Heh, heh... No that safeguard was put there to ensure your happiness. It is almost guaranteed not to compile because of API changes that happen between versions. There is no XML::Xerces-2.8 series. This is because the code has been reorganized into the Xerces-3.0 line - so it is actually part of the Xerces-C code now, a sub-project of Xerces-C and not it's own project. But sadly, Xerces-3.0 has still not been released. It will take a fairly large amount of work to put out a 2.8 release, and my free time is currently used up. I would rather suggest you use 2.7 until 3.0 is released. If someone is desperately needing 2.8 they can voice it on the list... Cheers, jas.
Hi Jason, Thx for your quick answer. Jason Stewart wrote: > Hi Xavier, > > On 2/12/08, Xavier Bachelot <xavier <at> bachelot.org> wrote: > >> Is there a XML::Xerces 2.8.0 counterpart to xerces-c 2.8.0 ? >> XML::Xerces 2.7.0 (latest, afaict) refuses to compile against xerces-c >> 2.8.0. Alternatively, do I need to trick it to compile against the >> mismatching version ? > > Heh, heh... No that safeguard was put there to ensure your happiness. > It is almost guaranteed not to compile because of API changes that > happen between versions. > Yeah, that's what I thought, but I wanted to make sure. > There is no XML::Xerces-2.8 series. This is because the code has been > reorganized into the Xerces-3.0 line - so it is actually part of the > Xerces-C code now, a sub-project of Xerces-C and not it's own project. > But sadly, Xerces-3.0 has still not been released. > Any release schedule for Xerces-3.0 ? > It will take a fairly large amount of work to put out a 2.8 release, > and my free time is currently used up. I would rather suggest you use > 2.7 until 3.0 is released. If someone is desperately needing 2.8 they(Continue reading)
RSS Feed1 | |
|---|---|
1 | |
1 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
3 | |
1 | |
1 | |
3 | |
3 | |
1 | |
1 | |
3 | |
1 | |
3 | |
1 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
6 | |
3 | |
1 | |
1 | |
11 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
2 | |
25 | |
16 | |
11 | |
1 | |
3 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
11 | |
18 | |
19 | |
8 | |
7 | |
30 | |
7 | |
4 | |
11 | |
21 | |
3 | |
13 | |
7 | |
16 | |
8 | |
9 | |
11 | |
39 | |
26 | |
27 | |
27 | |
24 | |
21 | |
59 | |
95 | |
44 | |
10 | |
5 |
