Winterflood, Jonathan | 1 Aug 2008 10:33
Favicon

RE: Help with layout and design

Hi,

 

As far as I can tell, your current data is in some kind of fixed width columns, padded with spaces.

If this is the case, you could just use substring(string,start[,len]) to cut it up. Obviously this would require knowing the width of the column.

 

As a variation on Andreas’ solution, maybe the splitting criteria could be the presence of n spaces (3 or so?)

 

Obviously these can break if the data ever gets too long and breaks the fixed-length column layout, or contains multiple spaces in the data, or the data is just small enough and there is only one space between columns.

Cheers,

Jonathan Winterflood (3237)

Capgemini Ouest – Agence de Brest

P Please consider the environment and do not print this email unless  absolutely necessary. Capgemini encourages environmental awareness

De : Ashish Kulkarni [mailto:ashish.kulkarni13 <at> gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 31 juillet 2008 21:14
À : fop-users <at> xmlgraphics.apache.org
Objet : Re: Help with layout and design

 

Hi

The issue, i am not the one designing this XML file, but it is already exisiting XML file, used in some other application, 

This application some how has a templelate and then takes this XML file and mergers with this template to create PDF file, and i have to analyize if we can do this uing XSL-FO with out modifying the XML file.

I guess we cannot use the XML file as is, but have to modify the XML file to add some sort of delimiter to the data

Ashish

 

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Griffin,Sean <SGRIFFIN <at> cerner.com> wrote:

I don't think your problem will be XSLT and certainly not XSL-FO but how you tell the difference between one column and the next and which data element you're actually dealing with.

 

Just pseudo-code, outside of any particular language, what would the algorithm be for determining that.  How you turn that algorithm into code in XSLT could be trivial, if it's even safely possible.

 

From: Ashish Kulkarni [mailto:ashish.kulkarni13 <at> gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 11:15 AM
To: fop-users <at> xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Help with layout and design

 

Hi

I have an XML file where the data is as below

<data>

<line1>My Name                                        1 of 1</line1>

<line2>My Address                                      01/12/2008</line2>

<!--more lines of data here -->

</data>

I need to have boxes on PDF file like below, where i will hard code Name, page 

___________________________________________________________________

Name: My Name                             Page: 1of 1

Address: My Address                      Date: 01/12/2008

___________________________________________________________________

Is it possible to do some thing like this using XSLT and XSL-Fo

Any suggestions

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.

 

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
Bones | 1 Aug 2008 19:19
Picon

Re: Add blank page number citation to next page


Hi List,

Does anyone have any ideas for my question? This one has me puzzled. Is it
possible?

Thanks,

bonekrusher wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I a have a specification that states:
> 
> "A blank page shall be assigned a number, but it will appear on the either
> the page before or after."
> 
> For example:
> 
> If page 35 was blank, page 36 page number would be:
> 
> 36 (Blank 35)
> 
> Is there a way to do this with XSLT and FO?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Bones
> 
> 

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Add-blank-page-number-citation-to-next-page-tp18010274p18779048.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Andreas Delmelle | 2 Aug 2008 11:05
Picon
Favicon

Re: Add blank page number citation to next page

On Aug 1, 2008, at 19:19, Bones wrote:

> Does anyone have any ideas for my question? This one has me  
> puzzled. Is it
> possible?

I don't think so.
A fo:page-number-citation requires an area to be on the blank page,  
which would make it not blank...

If useful, the page-number for the preceding page could probably be  
implemented as an extension attribute on fo:page-number, by means of  
which the author would be able to specify an offset (?)

<fo:page-number fox:offset="-1" />

But even then, unless I'm missing something, there would be no way to  
check for the condition of the previous page being blank during  
formatting.

Cheers

Andreas
bonekrusher | 2 Aug 2008 13:58
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Add blank page number citation to next page


Thanks Andreas,

That was my conclusion.  I think you are correct, but I needed a second
opinion from the list. 

Thank you,

Phil

Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
> 
> On Aug 1, 2008, at 19:19, Bones wrote:
> 
>> Does anyone have any ideas for my question? This one has me  
>> puzzled. Is it
>> possible?
> 
> I don't think so.
> A fo:page-number-citation requires an area to be on the blank page,  
> which would make it not blank...
> 
> If useful, the page-number for the preceding page could probably be  
> implemented as an extension attribute on fo:page-number, by means of  
> which the author would be able to specify an offset (?)
> 
> <fo:page-number fox:offset="-1" />
> 
> But even then, unless I'm missing something, there would be no way to  
> check for the condition of the previous page being blank during  
> formatting.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Andreas
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe <at> xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help <at> xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Add-blank-page-number-citation-to-next-page-tp18010274p18788552.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Alias John Brown | 5 Aug 2008 05:25
Picon
Favicon

Font <substitution> not working with Ghostscript font


I have been trying to use the "URW Bookman L" font, which is one of the
Ghostscript fonts (b018012l.pfb). Apache FOP recognises it only when it is
bold.
More accurately, it uses the Demi Bold font when Bold is requested.
Howevere, it does not use the Light font when Normal is requested,
which is what I want.

When I run fc-list, I get the following information:

$ fc-list | grep URW\ Book
URW Bookman L:style=Demi Bold
URW Bookman L:style=Light
URW Bookman L:style=Light Italic
URW Bookman L:style=Demi Bold Italic

I wrote a small FO file:

?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"
xmlns:fox="http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/extensions" font-family="URW
Bookman L">
  <fo:layout-master-set>
    <fo:simple-page-master master-name="A4" page-height="29.7cm"
page-width="21cm" margin="2cm">
      <fo:region-body/>
    </fo:simple-page-master>
  </fo:layout-master-set>
  <fo:page-sequence master-reference="A4">
    <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body">
      <fo:block>
        <fox:destination internal-destination="hello"/>
      </fo:block>
      <fo:block id="hello-normal" font-weight="normal">Hello World
Normal!</fo:block>
      <fo:block id="hello-bold" font-weight="bold">Hello World
Bold!</fo:block>
      <fo:block id="hello-italic" font-style="italic">Hello World
Italic!</fo:block>
      <fo:block id="hello-bold-italic" font-weight="bold"
font-style="italic">Hello World Bold Italic!</fo:block>
    </fo:flow>
  </fo:page-sequence>
</fo:root>

I wrote fop.xconf like this:

$ fop -c fop.xconf font.fo font.pdf
Aug 4, 2008 6:35:36 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
processEvent
WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,normal,400" not found. Substituting with
"any,normal,400".
Aug 4, 2008 6:35:36 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
processEvent
WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,normal,700" not found. Substituting with "URW
Bookman L,normal,600".
Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
processEvent
WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,italic,400" not found. Substituting with
"any,italic,400".
Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
processEvent
WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,italic,700" not found. Substituting with "URW
Bookman L,italic,600".
Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
processEvent
WARNING: Destination: Unresolved ID reference "hello" found.

I tried various combinations of the following:

<substitutions>
   <substitution>
     <from font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="normal"
font-style="normal"/>
     <to   font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="?" font-style="?"/>
   </substitution>
 </substitutions>

but nothing worked.

I made a font metrics file. Within the font metric file, I changed the name
of the font
from URWBookmanL-Ligh to "URW Bookman L", and in the fop.xconf, I wrote:

<font-triplet name="URW Bookman L" style="normal" weight="normal"/>

This seemed to work, but it was very tiresome. Normal, Bold and Bold Italic
are
working now, so I only have to do it one more time to make Italic work.

How can I get font substitution to work?

My complete fop.xconf is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<fop>
 <renderers>
 <renderer mime="application/pdf">
 <fonts>
 <substitutions>
   <substitution>
     <from font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="normal"
font-style="normal"/>
     <to   font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="?" font-style="?"/>
   </substitution>
 </substitutions>
<!--

  <font-triplet name="URW Bookman L" style="normal" weight="normal"/>

-->
<!-- <directory recursive="true">/usr/local/share/fonts</directory> -->
 <directory recursive="true">/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts</directory>
 <auto-detect/> 
 </fonts>
 </renderer>
 </renderers>
</fop>

I am using fop-trunk r 682557 (Jul 31, 2008).

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Font-%3Csubstitution%3E-not-working-with-Ghostscript-font-tp18823889p18823889.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Jeremias Maerki | 5 Aug 2008 09:51
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Font <substitution> not working with Ghostscript font

Your configuration is slightly wrong. It should look like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<fop>
  <fonts>
    <substitutions>
      <substitution>
        <from font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="400"/>
        <to font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="200"/>
      </substitution>
    </substitutions>
  </fonts>
  <renderers>
    <renderer mime="application/pdf">
      <fonts>
        <directory recursive="true">/usr/local/share/fonts</directory>
        <auto-detect/>
      </fonts>
    </renderer>
  </renderers>
</fop>

The substitutions are defined for all renderers. Plus see my changes to
the from/to elements.

I've also fixed a couple of problems in Trunk found while looking into
this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682616&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682617&view=rev

Now I need to check why the font lookup didn't automatically replace the
weight 400 with weight 200. I thought I had added that at some point.

On 05.08.2008 05:25:09 Alias John Brown wrote:
> 
> I have been trying to use the "URW Bookman L" font, which is one of the
> Ghostscript fonts (b018012l.pfb). Apache FOP recognises it only when it is
> bold.
> More accurately, it uses the Demi Bold font when Bold is requested.
> Howevere, it does not use the Light font when Normal is requested,
> which is what I want.
> 
> When I run fc-list, I get the following information:
> 
> $ fc-list | grep URW\ Book
> URW Bookman L:style=Demi Bold
> URW Bookman L:style=Light
> URW Bookman L:style=Light Italic
> URW Bookman L:style=Demi Bold Italic
> 
> I wrote a small FO file:
> 
> ?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"
> xmlns:fox="http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/extensions" font-family="URW
> Bookman L">
>   <fo:layout-master-set>
>     <fo:simple-page-master master-name="A4" page-height="29.7cm"
> page-width="21cm" margin="2cm">
>       <fo:region-body/>
>     </fo:simple-page-master>
>   </fo:layout-master-set>
>   <fo:page-sequence master-reference="A4">
>     <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body">
>       <fo:block>
>         <fox:destination internal-destination="hello"/>
>       </fo:block>
>       <fo:block id="hello-normal" font-weight="normal">Hello World
> Normal!</fo:block>
>       <fo:block id="hello-bold" font-weight="bold">Hello World
> Bold!</fo:block>
>       <fo:block id="hello-italic" font-style="italic">Hello World
> Italic!</fo:block>
>       <fo:block id="hello-bold-italic" font-weight="bold"
> font-style="italic">Hello World Bold Italic!</fo:block>
>     </fo:flow>
>   </fo:page-sequence>
> </fo:root>
> 
> I wrote fop.xconf like this:
> 
> 
> $ fop -c fop.xconf font.fo font.pdf
> Aug 4, 2008 6:35:36 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> processEvent
> WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,normal,400" not found. Substituting with
> "any,normal,400".
> Aug 4, 2008 6:35:36 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> processEvent
> WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,normal,700" not found. Substituting with "URW
> Bookman L,normal,600".
> Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> processEvent
> WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,italic,400" not found. Substituting with
> "any,italic,400".
> Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> processEvent
> WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,italic,700" not found. Substituting with "URW
> Bookman L,italic,600".
> Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> processEvent
> WARNING: Destination: Unresolved ID reference "hello" found.
> 
> 
> I tried various combinations of the following:
> 
> <substitutions>
>    <substitution>
>      <from font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="normal"
> font-style="normal"/>
>      <to   font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="?" font-style="?"/>
>    </substitution>
>  </substitutions>
> 
> but nothing worked.
> 
> I made a font metrics file. Within the font metric file, I changed the name
> of the font
> from URWBookmanL-Ligh to "URW Bookman L", and in the fop.xconf, I wrote:
> 
> <font-triplet name="URW Bookman L" style="normal" weight="normal"/>
> 
> 
> This seemed to work, but it was very tiresome. Normal, Bold and Bold Italic
> are
> working now, so I only have to do it one more time to make Italic work.
> 
> How can I get font substitution to work?
> 
> My complete fop.xconf is:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <fop>
>  <renderers>
>  <renderer mime="application/pdf">
>  <fonts>
>  <substitutions>
>    <substitution>
>      <from font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="normal"
> font-style="normal"/>
>      <to   font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="?" font-style="?"/>
>    </substitution>
>  </substitutions>
> <!--
>  
>   <font-triplet name="URW Bookman L" style="normal" weight="normal"/>
>  
> -->
> <!-- <directory recursive="true">/usr/local/share/fonts</directory> -->
>  <directory recursive="true">/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts</directory>
>  <auto-detect/> 
>  </fonts>
>  </renderer>
>  </renderers>
> </fop>
> 
> 
> I am using fop-trunk r 682557 (Jul 31, 2008).
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Font-%3Csubstitution%3E-not-working-with-Ghostscript-font-tp18823889p18823889.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 

Jeremias Maerki
Jeremias Maerki | 5 Aug 2008 10:01
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Font <substitution> not working with Ghostscript font

Ok, found it:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682618&view=rev

With this latest change you shouldn't need any font substitutions.
Anyway, you will still get font substitution warnings because exact font
matches couldn't be found. To avoid them you'd have to use the exact
font weight in the FO:

font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="200" (for URW Bookman Light)
font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="600" (for URW Bookman DemiBold)

On 05.08.2008 09:51:30 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Your configuration is slightly wrong. It should look like this:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <fop>
>   <fonts>
>     <substitutions>
>       <substitution>
>         <from font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="400"/>
>         <to font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="200"/>
>       </substitution>
>     </substitutions>
>   </fonts>
>   <renderers>
>     <renderer mime="application/pdf">
>       <fonts>
>         <directory recursive="true">/usr/local/share/fonts</directory>
>         <auto-detect/>
>       </fonts>
>     </renderer>
>   </renderers>
> </fop>
> 
> The substitutions are defined for all renderers. Plus see my changes to
> the from/to elements.
> 
> I've also fixed a couple of problems in Trunk found while looking into
> this:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682616&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=682617&view=rev
> 
> Now I need to check why the font lookup didn't automatically replace the
> weight 400 with weight 200. I thought I had added that at some point.
> 
> On 05.08.2008 05:25:09 Alias John Brown wrote:
> > 
> > I have been trying to use the "URW Bookman L" font, which is one of the
> > Ghostscript fonts (b018012l.pfb). Apache FOP recognises it only when it is
> > bold.
> > More accurately, it uses the Demi Bold font when Bold is requested.
> > Howevere, it does not use the Light font when Normal is requested,
> > which is what I want.
> > 
> > When I run fc-list, I get the following information:
> > 
> > $ fc-list | grep URW\ Book
> > URW Bookman L:style=Demi Bold
> > URW Bookman L:style=Light
> > URW Bookman L:style=Light Italic
> > URW Bookman L:style=Demi Bold Italic
> > 
> > I wrote a small FO file:
> > 
> > ?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format"
> > xmlns:fox="http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/extensions" font-family="URW
> > Bookman L">
> >   <fo:layout-master-set>
> >     <fo:simple-page-master master-name="A4" page-height="29.7cm"
> > page-width="21cm" margin="2cm">
> >       <fo:region-body/>
> >     </fo:simple-page-master>
> >   </fo:layout-master-set>
> >   <fo:page-sequence master-reference="A4">
> >     <fo:flow flow-name="xsl-region-body">
> >       <fo:block>
> >         <fox:destination internal-destination="hello"/>
> >       </fo:block>
> >       <fo:block id="hello-normal" font-weight="normal">Hello World
> > Normal!</fo:block>
> >       <fo:block id="hello-bold" font-weight="bold">Hello World
> > Bold!</fo:block>
> >       <fo:block id="hello-italic" font-style="italic">Hello World
> > Italic!</fo:block>
> >       <fo:block id="hello-bold-italic" font-weight="bold"
> > font-style="italic">Hello World Bold Italic!</fo:block>
> >     </fo:flow>
> >   </fo:page-sequence>
> > </fo:root>
> > 
> > I wrote fop.xconf like this:
> > 
> > 
> > $ fop -c fop.xconf font.fo font.pdf
> > Aug 4, 2008 6:35:36 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> > processEvent
> > WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,normal,400" not found. Substituting with
> > "any,normal,400".
> > Aug 4, 2008 6:35:36 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> > processEvent
> > WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,normal,700" not found. Substituting with "URW
> > Bookman L,normal,600".
> > Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> > processEvent
> > WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,italic,400" not found. Substituting with
> > "any,italic,400".
> > Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> > processEvent
> > WARNING: Font "URW Bookman L,italic,700" not found. Substituting with "URW
> > Bookman L,italic,600".
> > Aug 4, 2008 6:35:37 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener
> > processEvent
> > WARNING: Destination: Unresolved ID reference "hello" found.
> > 
> > 
> > I tried various combinations of the following:
> > 
> > <substitutions>
> >    <substitution>
> >      <from font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="normal"
> > font-style="normal"/>
> >      <to   font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="?" font-style="?"/>
> >    </substitution>
> >  </substitutions>
> > 
> > but nothing worked.
> > 
> > I made a font metrics file. Within the font metric file, I changed the name
> > of the font
> > from URWBookmanL-Ligh to "URW Bookman L", and in the fop.xconf, I wrote:
> > 
> > <font-triplet name="URW Bookman L" style="normal" weight="normal"/>
> > 
> > 
> > This seemed to work, but it was very tiresome. Normal, Bold and Bold Italic
> > are
> > working now, so I only have to do it one more time to make Italic work.
> > 
> > How can I get font substitution to work?
> > 
> > My complete fop.xconf is:
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > <fop>
> >  <renderers>
> >  <renderer mime="application/pdf">
> >  <fonts>
> >  <substitutions>
> >    <substitution>
> >      <from font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="normal"
> > font-style="normal"/>
> >      <to   font-family="URW Bookman L" font-weight="?" font-style="?"/>
> >    </substitution>
> >  </substitutions>
> > <!--
> >  
> >   <font-triplet name="URW Bookman L" style="normal" weight="normal"/>
> >  
> > -->
> > <!-- <directory recursive="true">/usr/local/share/fonts</directory> -->
> >  <directory recursive="true">/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts</directory>
> >  <auto-detect/> 
> >  </fonts>
> >  </renderer>
> >  </renderers>
> > </fop>
> > 
> > 
> > I am using fop-trunk r 682557 (Jul 31, 2008).
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Font-%3Csubstitution%3E-not-working-with-Ghostscript-font-tp18823889p18823889.html
> > Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 

Jeremias Maerki
Kamal Bhatt | 5 Aug 2008 10:07
Picon
Favicon

0.95beta out of the wilderness?

Hi,
I know it is bad form to ask this question, but I was wondering when 
0.95beta would cease to be a beta and become a full fledged version? I 
would like to use it in our production environment but I cannot make the 
case for it while it is in beta. Actually, I would really like what is 
in trunk to be released (working of course) as it has a feature I really 
need.

Thanks.

--

-- 
Kamal Bhatt
Jeremias Maerki | 5 Aug 2008 10:16
Picon
Gravatar

Re: 0.95beta out of the wilderness?

Hehe. We've been working on the during the last few days. I'm just
waiting for the mirrors to catch up until I post the announcement.

Please note that 0.95 final will be a bugfix release to 0.95 beta. Most
of the features in trunk won't be in 0.95 final. What feature are you
referring to?

On 05.08.2008 10:07:27 Kamal Bhatt wrote:
> Hi,
> I know it is bad form to ask this question, but I was wondering when 
> 0.95beta would cease to be a beta and become a full fledged version? I 
> would like to use it in our production environment but I cannot make the 
> case for it while it is in beta. Actually, I would really like what is 
> in trunk to be released (working of course) as it has a feature I really 
> need.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Kamal Bhatt

Jeremias Maerki
Kamal Bhatt | 5 Aug 2008 10:53
Picon
Favicon

Re: 0.95beta out of the wilderness?

Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hehe. We've been working on the during the last few days. I'm just waiting for the mirrors to catch up until I post the announcement. Please note that 0.95 final will be a bugfix release to 0.95 beta. Most of the features in trunk won't be in 0.95 final. What feature are you referring to?

The feature I wanted was min-height. We spent most of today trying to work out a good hack to replicate it. Setting a height on a row is the closest we could get :( (FOP just spits out a warning if there is "overflow", but lets it go through). Just as long as 0.95 doesn't change this, we will probably upgrade.

How long does it take for the mirrors catch up?
On 05.08.2008 10:07:27 Kamal Bhatt wrote:
Hi, I know it is bad form to ask this question, but I was wondering when 0.95beta would cease to be a beta and become a full fledged version? I would like to use it in our production environment but I cannot make the case for it while it is in beta. Actually, I would really like what is in trunk to be released (working of course) as it has a feature I really need. Thanks. -- Kamal Bhatt
Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe <at> xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help <at> xmlgraphics.apache.org


-- Kamal Bhatt

Gmane