Timo Baumann | 1 Jun 2007 10:43
Picon

Re: Footnotes in Lists?

Hi Thomas,

you don't make any mistake. You are just hitting bug 37579. There is a somewhat outdated patch attached to
that bug, that will fix your problem. I will hopefully attach a newer version of the patch sometime soon,
but it is still not ready to be commited because it does not catch all the borderline cases (for example
footnotes in list-item-labels).

Gruß nach Tübingen,

Timo

----- original Nachricht --------

Betreff: Footnotes in Lists?
Gesendet: Do, 31. Mai 2007
Von: Thomas Zastrow<listen <at> thomas-zastrow.de>

> Hello,
> 
> I have a problem with footnotes within lists: the footnote itself is 
> displayed in the list (here: footnote number 2), but the corresponding 
> text at the bottom of the page isn't displayed. Here my code:
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> <fo:list-item>
> 
> <fo:list-item-label 
> end-indent="label-end()"><fo:block>.</fo:block></fo:list-item-label>
> 
(Continue reading)

Thomas Zastrow | 1 Jun 2007 18:22
Picon
Favicon

Re: Footnotes in Lists?

Timo Baumann schrieb:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> you don't make any mistake. You are just hitting bug 37579. There is a somewhat outdated patch attached to
that bug, that will fix your problem. I will hopefully attach a newer version of the patch sometime soon,
but it is still not ready to be commited because it does not catch all the borderline cases (for example
footnotes in list-item-labels).
>
> Gruß nach Tübingen,
>
> Timo
>
>   
Thank you very much :-)

Gruss nach wohin auch immer :-)

Tom

--

-- 
----------------------------
http://www.thomas-zastrow.de

German Forum - DTP under Linux:

http://www.opendtp.de
----------------------------

bugzilla | 4 Jun 2007 08:08
Picon
Favicon

Bug report for Fop [2007/06/03]

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bugzilla Bug ID                                                           |
|     +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
|     | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New         ASS=Assigned                |
|     |         OPN=Reopened    VER=Verified    (Skipped Closed/Resolved)   |
|     |   +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
|     |   | Severity: BLK=Blocker     CRI=Critical    MAJ=Major             |
|     |   |           MIN=Minor       NOR=Normal      ENH=Enhancement       |
|     |   |   +-------------------------------------------------------------+
|     |   |   | Date Posted                                                 |
|     |   |   |          +--------------------------------------------------+
|     |   |   |          | Description                                      |
|     |   |   |          |                                                  |
| 1063|New|Nor|2001-03-21|fop does not handle large fo files                |
| 2150|Ass|Maj|2001-06-13|New page with  a table-header but without any tabl|
| 2909|New|Maj|2001-07-30|Gradient render error                             |
| 2988|New|Maj|2001-08-03|0.19: list-item-label does not stick to list-item-|
| 3280|New|Nor|2001-08-27|PCL Renderer doesn't work                         |
| 3497|New|Cri|2001-09-07|id already exists error when using span="all" attr|
| 3824|New|Blk|2001-09-25|MIF option with tables                            |
| 4030|New|Nor|2001-10-08|IOException creating Postscript with graphics on S|
| 4535|New|Maj|2001-10-31|PCL renderer 1.13 not rendering SVG               |
| 4767|New|Nor|2001-11-09|SVG text is distored in PDF output                |
| 5010|New|Enh|2001-11-21|Better error reporting needed                     |
| 5124|New|Maj|2001-11-27|fo:block-container is not rendered properly using |
| 6094|Opn|Maj|2002-01-29|0.20.3rc hangs in endless loop                    |
| 6237|Opn|Nor|2002-02-05|&#xFB01 (fi ligature) produces a "sharp"?         |
| 6305|New|Nor|2002-02-07|Using fo:table-and-caption results in empty output|
| 6427|New|Enh|2002-02-13|Adding additional Type 1 fonts problem            |
| 6437|New|Maj|2002-02-13|Tables without fo:table-column don't render       |
(Continue reading)

Martin Voelkle | 4 Jun 2007 11:16
Picon

[PATCH] font-stretch

Hello

We needed font-stretch for PDF output at work, so I implemented it.

I got a nice stretch with the following example:
http://xep.xattic.com/xep/testsuite/features/stretch.fo

It is quite incomplete, but I hope that others will want to hack it a bit.
Please comment.

Martin Voelkle
Attachment (font-stretch.patch): application/octet-stream, 36 KiB
Chris Bowditch | 4 Jun 2007 11:37
Picon
Favicon

Re: [PATCH] font-stretch

Martin Voelkle wrote:

> Hello
> 
> We needed font-stretch for PDF output at work, so I implemented it.

Good news :)

> 
> I got a nice stretch with the following example:
> http://xep.xattic.com/xep/testsuite/features/stretch.fo
> 
> It is quite incomplete, but I hope that others will want to hack it a bit.
> Please comment.

This looks like a very useful patch. I assume you implemented it against 
the current FOP trunk and not the maintenance branch?

The procedure for submitting a patch is described here:

http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/dev/index.html#patches

Thanks,

Chris

bugzilla | 4 Jun 2007 12:25
Picon
Favicon

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42576] New: - force-page-count not working as expected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42576>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42576

           Summary: force-page-count not working as expected
           Product: Fop
           Version: all
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: page-master/layout
        AssignedTo: fop-dev <at> xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: v8emtdstg529g9b <at> jetable.org

The force-page-count does not work as expected for the end-on-odd and
end-on-even values.

As a side effect, the initial-page-number does not work either, as the
implementation uses force-page-count to simulate its effect.

There are two bugs-in-one here:
- The first page does not respect the force-page-count attribute
- Intermediate (ie. not first nor last) page-sequence erroneously implement the
end-on-* values by breaking at the first page, resulting in a first page being
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 4 Jun 2007 12:28
Picon
Favicon

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42576] - force-page-count not working as expected

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42576>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42576

------- Additional Comments From v8emtdstg529g9b <at> jetable.org  2007-06-04 03:28 -------
Sample.fo that demonstrates the bug:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<fo:root xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
  <fo:layout-master-set>

    <fo:simple-page-master master-name="first"
      page-height="297mm" page-width="210mm"
      margin-top="20mm" margin-bottom="20mm"
      margin-left="25mm" margin-right="25mm">
      <fo:region-body margin-bottom="20mm"/>
      <fo:region-before region-name="header-normal" extent="10mm"/>
      <fo:region-after region-name="footer-normal" extent="10mm"/>
    </fo:simple-page-master>

    <fo:simple-page-master master-name="normal"
      page-height="297mm" page-width="210mm"
      margin-top="20mm" margin-bottom="20mm"
      margin-left="25mm" margin-right="25mm">
      <fo:region-body margin-bottom="20mm"/>
      <fo:region-after region-name="footer-normal" extent="10mm"/>
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 4 Jun 2007 12:43
Picon
Favicon

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42577] New: - font-stretch [PATCH]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42577>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42577

           Summary: font-stretch [PATCH]
           Product: Fop
           Version: all
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: fop-dev <at> xmlgraphics.apache.org
        ReportedBy: martin.voelkle <at> gmail.com

Here is a patch that implements font-stretch for PDF output.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

bugzilla | 4 Jun 2007 12:44
Picon
Favicon

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42577] - font-stretch [PATCH]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42577>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42577

------- Additional Comments From martin.voelkle <at> gmail.com  2007-06-04 03:44 -------
Created an attachment (id=20307)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20307&action=view)
Implements font-stretch

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Martin Voelkle | 4 Jun 2007 12:51
Picon

Re: [PATCH] font-stretch

> > We needed font-stretch for PDF output at work, so I implemented it.
>
> Good news :)
>
> >
> > I got a nice stretch with the following example:
> > http://xep.xattic.com/xep/testsuite/features/stretch.fo
> >
> > It is quite incomplete, but I hope that others will want to hack it a bit.
> > Please comment.
>
> This looks like a very useful patch. I assume you implemented it against
> the current FOP trunk and not the maintenance branch?

Yes.

> The procedure for submitting a patch is described here:
>
> http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/dev/index.html#patches

Ok. I've opend bug


Gmane