1 Feb 2008 02:48
Re: Whatever happened to <at> precision?
Tim Finney <tfinney <at> RELTECH.ORG>
2008-02-01 01:48:32 GMT
2008-02-01 01:48:32 GMT
I would vote for that too. Tim Finney On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 08:31 -0800, Martin Holmes wrote: > Conal Tuohy wrote: > > <date> > > <date when="1640" cert="low"/> > > <date notBefore="1620" cert="medium"/> > > <date notAfter="1660" cert="high"/> > > </date> > > This seems an elegant and flexible approach to me. It allows refinements > like this, too: > > <date> > <date when="1640" cert="low"/> > <date notBefore="1620" notAfter="1660" cert="medium"/> > </date> > > where the certainty value applies to the whole date range. I would vote > for this being incorporated into the guidelines as good practice. > > Cheers, > Martin >
RSS Feed