1 Sep 2003 01:54
Issues and Observations
Markus Hoenicka <markus.hoenicka <at> mhoenicka.de>
2003-08-31 23:54:36 GMT
2003-08-31 23:54:36 GMT
Hi, another quick note... Justus H. Piater writes: > (e) All output formats: I do not understand how THES references are > supposed to work. The output contains superflouous dots. Is the > degree-granting institution to be coded as the publisher? In > that case, the output order would be > unconventional. Eur.J.Pharmacol. adds a trailing "(nd)", even > though the year does show up before. > The styles are incomplete in that they do not contain specifications for *all* reference types (I added only those that were important to me back then). If no matching spec is found, RefDB uses the GEN spec instead which is a one-size-fits-all fallback. You've found out the hard way that the results are not convincing. The solution is to figure out suitable style specifications for THES and the other missing reference types and add these to the styles. regards, Markus -- -- Markus Hoenicka markus.hoenicka <at> cats.de (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de(Continue reading)

RSS Feed