1 Jul 2004 06:01
Re: BackTalk-like Product Using ReST
David Goodger <goodger <at> python.org>
2004-07-01 04:01:20 GMT
2004-07-01 04:01:20 GMT
Mohsen Moeeni wrote: > I am investigating the feasibility of developing a BackTalk-like > Zope product using ReST. I know of someone else working on something similar: Frank Bennett of Nagoya University, in Japan. Frank, could you comment on Mohsen's post? (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.docutils.user/1351) > - Inline-comments can be separated from the main content by using > substitution directives. This makes further edition of the main > content easier and more error-prune. What's "error-prune"? Did you mean "error-prone" (a bad thing) or "error-proof" (possibly good)? > - Firstly if I make sense at all in this regard? Is this the/a > right way? I'm not sure. Would the "quote" directives be generated by software? Or would the user have to type them in? Disclaimer: I don't know Zope. > - Secondly, in quote_paragraph function above, you have paragraph > id as p_id. I doubt ReST paragraphs have any id. Any idea on how > to distinguish paragraphs? All Docutils document tree elements may have an ID. True, most paragraphs are not assigned an ID, but they can get one. > - Lastly, There should be a "Quote" mark after each **paragraph**(Continue reading)
One of the limitations of the original BackTalk that drove us to
extend it was the inclusion of the comments in the source
text. This raises a couple of problems. First, when you spin up a new
version of a document, you may want to archive it with the comments,
but you probably don't want old comments cluttering up the editable
source. It's a lot simpler to tidy up for a version transition if the
comments are stored outside of the document in the first place, say
under SQL, and spliced in by Zope when the document is displayed,
RSS Feed