1 Apr 2006 11:30
Re: How to simulate length mismatch of PCB traces
Yongjin, for the situation that you describe, W will work for the common parallel runs. Beyond that you can cascade on any: LC, LRC, U (RCRD), or 4O RLCG sections depending on just how accurate you would like to be. If the assumption is that the coupling on that final segment is weak, then the simplest answer would be a single LRC stage or the 4O model. You can derive the L and C values from the telegrapher's equations. R is going to be quite small. Your segment is quite small at 1mm even compared to 100ps rise time. When you are done, what you are going to see is a simple delay of 1mm*eR^-.5/C. For an eR of 4.0, that translates to 1mm/150E9mm/s or 6.7ps. L is going to be about 325pH, and C is going to be about 0.13pF. If you go with a cascade of RLCGs or 4O elements, you can estimate the line to line coupling with a field solver. Likely you will be in the 5-10% range. Regards, Steve. At 07:49 AM 3/31/2006, yc2158 wrote: >Steve, >Thanks for pointing me out my wrong answer(don't work at midnight!!). >You are totally right. >I am considering if I have "a line with a little extra segment on the >end that the other coupled lines don't" like what you wrote. >To simplify the problem, I am not considering eR variation and don't >have meander. My simulation purpose is to see the length mismatch >effect as waveforms at each line end.(Continue reading)
))))
A good model will never be simple enough
Giancarlo
Mark Randol ha scritto:
> Time to test my new Out of the Office Reply filter...
>
> My fave is rather old. =20
> "The reason circuits don't work as designed is paper doesn't conduct
RSS Feed