Re: Engines et all
Nice, I drove all the way to Kansas from RI to try and win a National
Championship. In some ways you road racers have it easy, you know at all
times who is in front of you to know if you are winning. We have to wait to
see if our time is better than the last one or the times of the people who
you are funning against. Even if the run feels great, it can turn out to be
slower than your last run. Try finding one or two thousands of a seconds
when you need it on a Solo II site that is different every event (we don't
get practice runs). We bust our butts just as much as anyone does, but we
only get three (3) minutes of running some days if we are lucky!
We had a local club (not SCCA) in NE that ran at Otis Air Force Base on Cape
Cod. Because they ran the same course many of us had the advantage of
knowing the course, just like if you have when runing a road course for
years. And talk about fast, my F440 (when it was slow) was faster than the
best C4 that ran there and AM cars were a good 10 seconds faster than me on
a course that would give times of 72 to 98 seconds. And if you crashed at
this place you took out a small tree, not a stack of tires. Hit a tree at
sixty or seventy miles per hour and see what it does to any car.
Also, many of us don't road race because of many reasons, but some like
myself have driven real GT40's at well over 150mph and know how to drive in
other than just a Solo II site.
So the point here is all the people who spend the money, time and effort to
run these cars (Solo II isn't as cheap as you may think) should have a say
in the engine question. Maybe we should do the strange thing of doing one
vote for one person, that sounds like the American way.
I would still like to see as many of the Rotax engines mentioned legal, but
it is starting to sound like the 493 is the way to go. I will still be able
(Continue reading)