Cassiano Terra Rodrigues | 18 Jun 2011 06:28
Picon

Re: Peirce article in latest Logica Universalis

Hello list, 


Sorry for this belated comment.
Dear Irving, thanks a lot for your attention to my paper. I hope it doesn't disappoint too much.
All the best
cass. 



2011/5/7 Irving <ianellis <at> iupui.edu>

In case you might have missed it, the most recent issue of the journal Logica Universalis includes the following article of potential interest to many Peirce scholars; it is

Cassiano Terra Rodrigues, "The Method of Scientific Discovery in Peirce's Philosophy: Deduction, Induction, and Abduction", Logica Universalis vol. 5, no. 1 (2011), 127-164.


You will find the abstract, and a link for purchasing the article, at:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/38533gkt9k54h122/

Apologies for redundancy if you received this through other channels.


Irving H. Anellis
Visiting Research Associate
Peirce Edition, Institute for American Thought
902 W. New York St.
Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis
Indianapolis, IN 46202-5159
USA
URL: http://www.irvinganellis.info


-----
**
** Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, which is ** the central pointer and guide for Peirce resources on the web: **            http://csp3.blogspot.com/ ** -------
**
** If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L  ** send a message to the list manager at:   **
**      joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com
**
** Just say "unsub", followed by your address


joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

--------

Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, the

central pointer and guide to Peirce resources on the web:

                  http://csp3.blogspot.com/


-------          

If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L send a

message to the list manager at the following address:

     joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

No reason need be given, just say "unsub", followed by your address

Shannon Dea | 21 Jun 2011 19:44
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Angus Kerr-Lawson

Dear Colleagues,


I write with regret to inform you of the death last night of my colleague, Angus Kerr-Lawson.

Kerr-Lawson was a distinguished scholar of the mathematics and logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, and of the philosophy of Baruch Spinoza.  He is best known, though, for his extensive work on the philosophy of George Santayana.  Kerr-Lawson's primary research on Santayana has focused on the latter's naturalism.

The Society for the Advancement of American Philosophy honoured Kerr-Lawson for his contributions to the field in 2008; in 2009, the Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society published a special issue of the journal devoted to his work.  

On Thursday, June 16, University of Waterloo named him Distinguished Professor Emeritus in recognition of his lifelong contributions to philosophy, to his department and to the university.

Sincerely,
Shannon Dea


--
Assistant Professor and Associate Chair, Undergraduate Studies
Department of Philosophy
University of Waterloo
200 University Ave. W.
Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1
(519) 888-4567 (ext. 32778)
FAX (519) 746-3097

--------

Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, the

central pointer and guide to Peirce resources on the web:

                  http://csp3.blogspot.com/


-------          

If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L send a

message to the list manager at the following address:

     joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

No reason need be given, just say "unsub", followed by your address

Gary Fuhrman | 21 Jun 2011 22:16
Picon
Favicon

RE: Angus Kerr-Lawson

Just in case this gets through ...

 

Both Vinicius and i have been trying to post here, but our messages haven’t appeared. We thought this might have something to do with server migration (though we haven’t heard anything about it from those in charge) so we’ve just been waiting. But now that two messages have appeared here in recent days, I thought i’d try again ... meanwhile there’s no telling when we’ll be able to resume the “slow read” (i was supposed to emcee for the month of June).

 

          Gary F.

 

--------

Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, the

central pointer and guide to Peirce resources on the web:

                  http://csp3.blogspot.com/


-------          

If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L send a

message to the list manager at the following address:

     joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

No reason need be given, just say "unsub", followed by your address

Gary Richmond | 21 Jun 2011 22:57
Favicon

The list migration accomplished? Was: RE: Angus Kerr-Lawson

Gary, list,
 
First, I'd like to say that it is very sad that we have lost yet another great Peircean scholar, Angus Kerr-Lawson. My condolences to his family, friends, and colleagues.
 
As to Gary F's concerns: I haven't heard from Jerry Dozoretz or Nathan Houser for a few weeks now. In one of our last communications Jerry suggested that the problems on the list were most likely the result of the migration of the list from Texas Tech to the Institute for American Thought (IAT), and that there was no certainty about when nor how that would go. It would appear that it is finally moving along.
 
So, let's hope that the list is now up and functioning and we can soon find some suitable way to resume the slow reads.
 
I've copied Jerry and Nathan's original post about the migration of peirce-l and Arisbe for those who might have missed it or who want to review it. More information as it is forthcoming.
 
Best,
 
Gary
 

Dear Members of Peirce-L,

 

On February 3rd, Ann Ransdell, Joe’s widow, after lengthy discussions with me, transferred Peirce-L and Arisbe to The Peirce Group (TPG), a non-profit company established by Joe a few years ago for the purpose of promoting Peirce studies. I am the operating officer of TPG and Nathan Houser is also an officer (we were both invited by Joe to join him in forming TPG). Nathan joins me in making this announcement.

 

After much thought about how to reestablish Peirce-L and Arisbe in a way that seems most likely to provide for stable continuation and long-term survival while insuring that the operating guidelines and principles established by Joe are not abandoned, we, with the approval of Joe’s family, have asked the Institute for American Thought (the home of the Peirce Edition Project) to house and operate Peirce-L and Arisbe. The Institute has agreed to do this.

 

Although the Institute for American Thought (IAT), with resources from IUPUI, will house and manage the listserv and website, TPG will maintain oversight control to insure that the purposes and principles articulated by Joe are followed. TPG will appoint an Advisory Board for this purpose and also to help guide the choice of moderator for Peirce-L and webmaster for Arisbe. André De Tienne, the Director of the Peirce Edition Project, and David Pfeifer, the Director of the Institute for American Thought, will be invited to serve on the TPG Advisory Board. Gary Richmond and Ben Udell, who have played a vital role in keeping the forum going during Joe’s final illness and following his passing), have agreed to serve on the Board. (We are especially delighted with their superb organization of the Slow Read of Joe’s papers.) Joe’s daughter, Lucy, will also be invited to serve and additional members may be appointed. Advisory Board appointments will be for two years and are renewable.

 

We will finalize an agreement with IAT in short order and expect the migrations of Peirce-L and Arisbe to occur sometime this month. Actually, we aren't sure how long it will take to fully migrate Peirce-L, including the archives, from Texas Tech to IAT but we expect the first stage (the migration of the now active forum) to begin this month and continue until the entire archives are converted and fully accessible. For the older archival records, the conversion process will take some time.

 

We hope that these changes will insure the survival and vitality of the important hubs of Peirce scholarship that Joe spent so many years developing and shepherding. No solution seemed perfect but we believe the stability promised by locating Peirce-L and Arisbe at the IAT while maintaining oversight control is an arrangement that Joe would have approved of. In fact, from numerous conversations over the last few years, we know that he had something like this in mind. We are very grateful that IAT has agreed to this arrangement.

 

With optimism for the future,

Jerry Dozoretz

Nathan Houser

 
 
Gary Richmond
Philosophy and Critical Thinking
Communication Studies
LaGuardia College of the City University of New York
718 482-5700


>>> "Gary Fuhrman" <gnox <at> gnusystems.ca> 6/21/2011 4:16 PM >>>

Just in case this gets through ...

 

Both Vinicius and i have been trying to post here, but our messages haven’t appeared. We thought this might have something to do with server migration (though we haven’t heard anything about it from those in charge) so we’ve just been waiting. But now that two messages have appeared here in recent days, I thought i’d try again ... meanwhile there’s no telling when we’ll be able to resume the “slow read” (i was supposed to emcee for the month of June).

 

          Gary F.

 

--------

Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, the

central pointer and guide to Peirce resources on the web:

                  http://csp3.blogspot.com/


-------          

If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L send a

message to the list manager at the following address:

     joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

No reason need be given, just say "unsub", followed by your address

--------

Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, the

central pointer and guide to Peirce resources on the web:

                  http://csp3.blogspot.com/


-------          

If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L send a

message to the list manager at the following address:

     joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

No reason need be given, just say "unsub", followed by your address

Frances Kelly | 19 Jun 2011 23:00
Picon
Favicon

RE: Slow Read: "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)"

Frances the lurker in the wings to Vinicius and Gary and others... 

Thanks for the good read your messages have given me, and especially about the issue of “infinite”
semiosis. To get right to my point and without references, some consideration of “representamen that
are not signs” and “representamen that are signs” may yield some light here about how broad
semiosis and signs might be in the whole wide world as held by semioticians here. It may be that
metaphysical phenomena are infinite and maybe even their continuent representamen, but perhaps not
existent semiosis or phenomenal representamen that are signs. There is also the issue of what kinds of
objects do occur in the world, which might impact on how infinity could or should be held for signs. My
thought here turns say to existent synechastic objects and to existent semiosic objects, and not only to
the pair of immediate and dynamic semiosic objects that are correctly held to exist in semiosis as signs
and for referent signs. It is not clear to me if the list settled this matter of representamen and objects in
previous discussions some time ago. 

-----
**
** Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, which is 
** the central pointer and guide for Peirce resources on the web: 
**            http://csp3.blogspot.com/ 
** -------
**
** If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L  
** send a message to the list manager at:   
**
**      joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com
**
** Just say "unsub", followed by your address

joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

Clark Goble | 23 Jun 2011 19:00

Re: The list migration accomplished? Was: RE: Angus Kerr-Lawson


On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Gary Richmond wrote:

As to Gary F's concerns: I haven't heard from Jerry Dozoretz or Nathan Houser for a few weeks now. In one of our last communications Jerry suggested that the problems on the list were most likely the result of the migration of the list from Texas Tech to the Institute for American Thought (IAT), and that there was no certainty about when nor how that would go. It would appear that it is finally moving along.
 
So, let's hope that the list is now up and functioning and we can soon find some suitable way to resume the slow reads.
 
I've copied Jerry and Nathan's original post about the migration of peirce-l and Arisbe for those who might have missed it or who want to review it. More information as it is forthcoming.
 

Please let the list know.  I've been quite busy and thus haven't had time to contribute at all.  But I'll make sure to publicize the list once it is running properly and new members can be added.  I feel quite strongly that the only way for the list to remain alive is to keep adding new blood. Further it would be useful to invite solid Peircean scholars.  Many of whom have been members of the list at one time or an other but who have dropped out as they move teaching positions.


--------

Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, the

central pointer and guide to Peirce resources on the web:

                  http://csp3.blogspot.com/


-------          

If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L send a

message to the list manager at the following address:

     joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

No reason need be given, just say "unsub", followed by your address

Frances Kelly | 22 Jun 2011 01:19
Picon
Favicon

RE: Slow Read: "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)"

Frances the lurker in the wings to Vinicius and Gary and others... 

Thanks for the good read your slow messages have given me, and especially about the issue of “infinite”
semiosis. To get right to my point but without references, in consideration of “representamen that are
not signs” and “representamen that are signs” this may yield some light here about how broad
semiosis and signs might be in the whole wide world as held by many semioticians here. It may be that
metaphysical phenomena as posited by Peirce are infinite and maybe even their continuent
representamen, but perhaps not existent semiosis or phenomenal representamen that are signs, as
Ransdell seems to hold. There is also the issue of what kinds of objects do occur in the world, which might
impact on how infinity could or should be held for signs. My thought here turns say to existent synechastic
objects and to existent semiosic objects, and not only to the pair of immediate and dynamic semiosic
objects that are correctly held to exist in semiosis as signs and for referent signs. It is not clear to me if
the list settled this matter of representamen and objects in previous discussions some time ago. 

-----
**
** Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, which is 
** the central pointer and guide for Peirce resources on the web: 
**            http://csp3.blogspot.com/ 
** -------
**
** If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L  
** send a message to the list manager at:   
**
**      joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com
**
** Just say "unsub", followed by your address

joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

Gary Fuhrman | 24 Jun 2011 16:33
Picon
Favicon

RE: Slow Read: "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)"

Frances, your message has appeared twice now ... perhaps a server hiccup ... i doubt that the fact that
messages are once again appearing on the list is an indication that the migration is "moving along" (as
Gary R. said), since they are coming from the old list address and not a new one. Indeed i think the absence of
any news about the migration posted here suggests to me that it's not going as planned. In any case, i don't
intend to start posting about the Ransdell essay on phenomenology until (1) we know that the list is
stabilized and (2) Vinicius has had a chance to wrap up the slow read that he was leading when posts ceased to
appear on the list.

On the infinite semiosis question, i don't understand Vinicius' objections to it (or to what JR wrote in the
Encyclopedia article). VR wrote:

[[ Here comes the infinite semeiosis again, now in the image of a potentially infinite chain, which does not
have beginning nor ending and, furthermore, has potentially infinite logical levels. I have problems
with this image because I see semeiois as the growth of embryonic forms which develop by the process on
information, that is, by internalizing qualities that enable development toward the more complex. ]]

But growth, for Peirce, is a process of further determination, and as he wrote in CP 1.447 (c.1896), " Every
determination gives a possibility of further determination." If determination is infinite in this
sense, why not semiosis? The process is infinite because its end point can be represented (if at all) by a
mathematical limit, which of course cannot *actually* be reached. 

I don't really follow your comments either, but i guess that as long as the list is in an unsettled state, we
might as well use it to discuss questions like this.

		Gary F.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frances Kelly [mailto:frances.kelly <at> sympatico.ca] 
Sent: June-21-11 7:20 PM
To: Peirce Discussion Forum
Subject: RE: [peirce-l] Slow Read: "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)"

Frances the lurker in the wings to Vinicius and Gary and others... 

Thanks for the good read your slow messages have given me, and especially about the issue of “infinite”
semiosis. To get right to my point but without references, in consideration of “representamen that are
not signs” and “representamen that are signs” this may yield some light here about how broad
semiosis and signs might be in the whole wide world as held by many semioticians here. It may be that
metaphysical phenomena as posited by Peirce are infinite and maybe even their continuent
representamen, but perhaps not existent semiosis or phenomenal representamen that are signs, as
Ransdell seems to hold. There is also the issue of what kinds of objects do occur in the world, which might
impact on how infinity could or should be held for signs. My thought here turns say to existent synechastic
objects and to existent semiosic objects, and not only to the pair of immediate and dynamic semiosic
objects that are correctly held to exist in semiosis as signs and for referent signs. It is not clear to me if
the list settled this matter of representamen and objects in previous discussions some time ago. 

-----
**
** Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, which is 
** the central pointer and guide for Peirce resources on the web: 
**            http://csp3.blogspot.com/ 
** -------
**
** If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L  
** send a message to the list manager at:   
**
**      joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com
**
** Just say "unsub", followed by your address

joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

Auke van Breemen | 24 Jun 2011 18:02
Picon

RE: Slow Read: "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)"


Gary you wrote about Vinicius:

G:
On the infinite semiosis question, i don't understand Vinicius' objections to it (or to what JR wrote in the
Encyclopedia article). VR wrote:

V:
[[ Here comes the infinite semeiosis again, now in the image of a potentially infinite chain, which does not
have beginning nor ending and, furthermore, has potentially infinite logical levels. I have problems
with this image because I see semeiois as the growth of embryonic forms which develop by the process on
information, that is, by internalizing qualities that enable development toward the more complex. ]]

G:
But growth, for Peirce, is a process of further determination, and as he wrote in CP 1.447 (c.1896), " Every
determination gives a possibility of further determination." If determination is infinite in this
sense, why not semiosis? The process is infinite because its end point can be represented (if at all) by a
mathematical limit, which of course cannot *actually* be reached. 

This is interesting. Both rearks remind me of the Questions concerning certain faculties claimed for man series.

Vinicius remark traces back to writings volume 2 p. 227.
	...the immediate (and therefore in itself insuspectible of mediation- the 	Unanalyzable, the
inexplicable, the Unintellectual) runs in a continuous stream 	through our lives.

This line of thought flows over in his phaneroscopy, I think, and gets significance in the notion of the
qualisign aspect of signs. It fits in with Vinicius process oriented project.

Yours reminds me of the discussion on the possibility of cognitions not determined by earlier cognitions.
In the context of his issue against introspection as a source for truth. Its focus is on thirdness. 

Besides that I would like to invite Vinicius to elaborate on the "potentially infinite logical levels". 

Best,

Auke van Breemen

-----
**
** Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, which is 
** the central pointer and guide for Peirce resources on the web: 
**            http://csp3.blogspot.com/ 
** -------
**
** If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L  
** send a message to the list manager at:   
**
**      joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com
**
** Just say "unsub", followed by your address

joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

Gary Richmond | 24 Jun 2011 21:05
Favicon

RE: Slow Read: "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)"

List,
I just a moment ago received a note from Jerry Dozoretz. He has been ill
for a time so unable to personally push forward on the list
migration/Arisbe migration matter, but commented "I am re-connecting
with the folk at the IAT as well as with Nathan [Houser] and hope to
have an informed update to share within the next few days."
Gary F. is probably right that I probably spoke prematurely about the
migration "moving along" since I was merely seeing that some, at least,
were able to post and receive posts again since, for a couple of weeks,
this wasn't happening. So the migration is not moving along as well as I
thought in that sense. But at least some glitch, which caused all list
activity to cease, has, apparently been overcome.  I do think that the
general effort is well underway (I recall Ben Udell outlining the
reasons why this was especially difficult & frustrating a number of
weeks ago) so let's all just hang on a little longer! 
I am at a biosemiotic conference in NYC all this week and I'll have a
report on that after it concludes tomorrow (especially as a few list
members are presenting ) and when I'm fairly sure list members can
receive and post messages. In the interest of determining if that is
so--and with the probable risk (and hope! of receiving a lot of messages
in my mailbox, will everyone who has a moment who is receiving list
messages write me an off-list note just to say as much, I'd greatly
appreciate it? My address is:
richmondga <at> lagcc.cuny.edu
Thanks in advance.
Gary Richmond

>>> "Gary Fuhrman"  06/24/11 7:33 AM >>>
Frances, your message has appeared twice now ... perhaps a server hiccup
... i doubt that the fact that messages are once again appearing on the
list is an indication that the migration is "moving along" (as Gary R.
said), since they are coming from the old list address and not a new
one. Indeed i think the absence of any news about the migration posted
here suggests to me that it's not going as planned. In any case, i don't
intend to start posting about the Ransdell essay on phenomenology until
(1) we know that the list is stabilized and (2) Vinicius has had a
chance to wrap up the slow read that he was leading when posts ceased to
appear on the list.

On the infinite semiosis question, i don't understand Vinicius'
objections to it (or to what JR wrote in the Encyclopedia article). VR
wrote:

[[ Here comes the infinite semeiosis again, now in the image of a
potentially infinite chain, which does not have beginning nor ending
and, furthermore, has potentially infinite logical levels. I have
problems with this image because I see semeiois as the growth of
embryonic forms which develop by the process on information, that is, by
internalizing qualities that enable development toward the more complex.
]]

But growth, for Peirce, is a process of further determination, and as he
wrote in CP 1.447 (c.1896), " Every determination gives a possibility of
further determination." If determination is infinite in this sense, why
not semiosis? The process is infinite because its end point can be
represented (if at all) by a mathematical limit, which of course cannot
*actually* be reached. 

I don't really follow your comments either, but i guess that as long as
the list is in an unsettled state, we might as well use it to discuss
questions like this.

        Gary F.

-----Original Message-----
From: Frances Kelly [mailto:frances.kelly <at> sympatico.ca] 
Sent: June-21-11 7:20 PM
To: Peirce Discussion Forum
Subject: RE: [peirce-l] Slow Read: "Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914)"

Frances the lurker in the wings to Vinicius and Gary and others... 

Thanks for the good read your slow messages have given me, and
especially about the issue of “infinite” semiosis. To get right to my
point but without references, in consideration of “representamen that
are not signs” and “representamen that are signs” this may yield some
light here about how broad semiosis and signs might be in the whole wide
world as held by maphenomena as posited by Peirce are infinite and maybe even their
continuent representamen, but perhaps not existent semiosis or
phenomenal representamen that are signs, as Ransdell seems to hold.
There is also the issue of what kinds of objects do occur in the world,
which might impact on how infinity could or should be held for signs. My
thought here turns say to existent synechastic objects and to existent
semiosic objects, and not only to the pair of immediate and dynamic
semiosic objects that are correctly held to exist in semiosis as signs
and for referent signs. It is not clear to me if the list settled this
matter of representamen and objects in previous discussions some time
ago. 

-----
**
** Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, which is 
** the central pointer and guide for Peirce resources on the web: 
**            http://csp3.blogspot.com/ 
** -------
**
** If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L  
** send a message to the list manager at:   
**
**      joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com
**
** Just say "unsub", followed by your address

joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com

-----
**
** Click on the following URL link for THE PEIRCE BLOG, which is 
** the central pointer and guide for Peirce resources on the web: 
**            http://csp3.blogspot.com/ 
** -------
**
** If you want to cancel your subscription to PEIRCE-L  
** send a message to the list manager at:   
**
**      joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com
**
** Just say "unsub", followed by your address

joseph.ransdell <at> yahoo.com


Gmane