1 Nov 2007 13:57
DVI, PDF and TAC
Paul Taylor <pt07 <at> PaulTaylor.EU>
2007-11-01 12:57:51 GMT
2007-11-01 12:57:51 GMT
Mike Barr reported that Adobe Acrobat 8 tacitly suppresses all ligature glyphs of the fi, fl, ff, ffi, and ffl sort and displays blanks in their place and then that I have to admit that I never tested it, just copied the complaint from texhax but nevertheless this presumably gives us some idea why, at TAC, we still consider the dvi to be the official format. However, as I shall demonstrate, the rest of the world nowadays regards PDF as the standard format in which to publish technical documents. DVI (the normal output from LaTeX) was based on the 1950s Monotype typesetting system, and puts characters from various fonts at given positions on the page, but cannot rotate them, and has no graphics capability. The fonts also have to be supplied separately. On the other hand, it has the virtues of being a compact and simple format that future digital archeologists would have no difficulty in deciphering. Adobe's PDF and PostScript have general graphics capability. By insisting on DVI, "Theory and Applications of Categories" severely limits the ways in which authors can express their mathematical ideas. But its restrictions go further than this: the use of ANY macro package other than those by Mike Barr and Kris Rose is forbidden! Does anyone know of another journal that publishes primarily in DVI? One candidate might be the journal of the TeX Users' Group,(Continue reading)
RSS Feed