4 Apr 1998 16:07
Neil Ghani's question
Michael Barr <barr <at> triples.math.mcgill.ca>
1998-04-04 14:07:35 GMT
1998-04-04 14:07:35 GMT
A week or two ago, Neil Ghani asked about natural transformations
between set-valued functors (I think they were set-valued, but anyway
that is what my answer refers to and is probably true for any reasonably
complete codomain category although a different argument would be
required), say a: F ---> G, such that for any arrow f: A ---> B of the
domain category, the square
aA
FA --------> GA
| |
| |
|Ff |Gf
| |
| |
v aB v
FB --------> GB
is a pullback. At the time, I sent Neil a private reply, but it
bounced for some reason. (I said that that I thought that this
condition was reasonable only when restricted to monic f and then such
an a is called an elementary embedding.) Then a couple of people
answered that it was called a cartesian arrow and I didn't try to resend
my answer. Well, there is a simpler answer. In that generality, such
an a is called a natural equivalence. In other words, non-trivial
examples do not exist.
To see this, it is useful to translate it, using Yoneda, into the
following form. As usual, I will say that of two classes E and M of
arrows in a category, E _|_ M (E is orthogonal to M) if in any diagram
e
A ----> B
| |
(Continue reading)
RSS Feed