Re: Focus on sister projects
Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin <at> gmail.com>
2011-04-02 02:11:22 GMT
Ok — yes loading speeds are definitely something worth improving.
WT:PREFS to become gadgets has been discussed ever since gadgets was
released, it will happen one day :). Luckily that code is only loaded
for people who are using WT:PREFS, so it should have minimal impact.
I'd be pretty interested to — do you have a guideline as to the
expected format. In particular I think the "core" of the editor, which
save the page (with edit summaries) would be pretty useful everywhere.
It's documented in the first half of
there's a tutorial at
but it could do with "new-ification" (in particular some jQuery would
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Ryan Kaldari <rkaldari <at> wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Good idea. After the 1.17 deployment, I've been trying to go through and
> over the years. One of the main goals of 1.17 was improving page loading
> accomplish that much. On wiktionary specifically, the importScript and
> importExternalScript functions are redundant, and the Wiktionary:PREFS
> system should be retired now that Gadgets are available. I admit I was much
> too gung-ho in my clean-up regarding Wiktionary, and I intend to let the