fatima zuhra | 1 Mar 2012 08:14
Picon
Favicon

Research work

Dear all,
 
I want to know if someone shares a copy of his/her research work with another person for review or checking purpose and the other person sends that for publication (claiming the authorship) then how the researcher will prove that it is his/her own research and not that of the other one?
 
Thanks. 
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
Pamela Forner | 1 Mar 2012 12:16
Picon
Favicon

CLEF 2012 Labs - Registration is now open


**Apologies if you receive multiple copies. Please disseminate as appropriate **

************************************************************************************************************************************************
NEW!  The registration to CLEF 2012 Labs is now open. 

Please register to the Lab(s) you are interested in, by filling in the form at http://clef2012.org/index.php?page=Pages/registrationForm.php

************************************************************************************************************************************************

CLEF 2012 Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum
Information Access Evaluation meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Visual Analytics

http://clef2012.org/

CLEF 2012 Labs - Call for Participation -

The CLEF 2012 is next year's edition of the popular CLEF campaign and workshop series
(http://www.clef-initiative.eu//) which has run since 2000 contributing to the systematic
evaluation of information access systems, primarily through experimentation on shared tasks. 
In 2010 CLEF was launched in a new format, as a conference with research presentations, panels, poster and
demo sessions and laboratory evaluation workshops. Labs follow under two types: laboratories to
conduct evaluation of information access systems, and workshops to discuss and pilot innovative
evaluation activities.
In 2012, CLEF will take place in September 17-20 in Rome, and researchers and practitioners from all
segments of the information access and related communities are invited to participate to the following
Evaluation Labs:

CHiC - Cultural Heritage in CLEF 
The CHiC 2012 pilot evaluation lab aims at moving towards a systematic and large-scale evaluation of
cultural heritage digital libraries and information access systems. Data test collections and queries
will come from the cultural heritage domain (in 2012 data from Europeana) and tasks will contain a mix of
conventional system-oriented evaluation scenarios (e.g. ad-hoc retrieval and semantic enrichment)
for comparison with other domains and a uniquely customized scenario for the CH domain, i.e. a
variability task to present a particular good overview ("must sees") over the different object types and
categories in the collection targeted towards a casual user.
Lab Coordinators: Berlin School of Library and Information Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
(DE); Department of Information Engineering, U. of Padova (IT); Royal School of Library and Information
Science, Copenhagen (DE); The Information School, U. of Sheffield (UK); Europeana, The Hague,
Netherlands (NL)
Lab Webpage: http://www.promise-noe.eu/chic-2012/home

CLEF-IP : IR in the IP domain
The CLEF-IP lab provides a large collection of XML documents representing patents and patent images. On
this collection we organize the following four tasks:
- Passage Retrieval starting from claims: Starting from a given claim, we ask to retrieve relevant
documents in the collection and mark out the relevant passages in these documents.
- Matching Claim to description in a single document (Pilot): Starting from the claims of an patent
application, we ask to indicate the paragraphs in the application's description section (same
document) that best explain the contents of the given claim.
- Flowchart Recognition Task: Extract the information in flowchart images and return it in a predefined
textual format.
- Chemical Structure Recognition Task. Starting from TIFF images containing patent scans, we ask to
identify the location of the chemical structures depicted on these pages and, for each of them, return the
corresponding structure in a MOL file (a chemical structure file format).
Lab Coordinators: Vienna University of Technology (AT), SAIC-Frederick Inc. (US), Fraunhofer SCAI
(DE), U. of Birmingham (UK). 
Lab Webpage: http://ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~clef-ip/

ImageCLEF - Cross Language Image Retrieval
This lab evaluates the cross-language annotation and retrieval of images by focusing on the combination
of textual and visual evidence. Four challenging tasks are foreseen:
- Medical task: image modality classification and image retrieval with visual, semantic and mixed topics
in several languages, using a data collection from the biomedical literature;
- Photo annotation and retrieval: semantic concept detection and concept-based retrieval using Flickr
data, and large-scale annotation using general Web data;
- Plant identification: visual classification of leaf images for the identification of plant species;
- Robot vision: semantic localisation of a mobile robot using multimodal place classification, with
special focus on generalization.
Lab Coordinators: IDIAP (CH), National Library of Medicine (US), U. of Applied Sciences Western
Switzerland (CH), CEA LIST (FR), Harvard Medical School (US),  Yahoo! Research (ES), Nuance
Communications (US), INRA-AMAP (FR), INRIA (FR), U. Politècnica de Valencia (ES).
Lab Webpage: http://www.imageclef.org/

INEX - INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval
INEX has been pioneering structured retrieval since 2002, and will join forces with CLEF. running five tracks:
- Social Book Search Track: studying the value of user-generated descriptions in addition to formal
metadata on a collection of Amazon Books and LibraryThing.com data.
- Data Centric Track: studying adhoc search and facetted search on a collection of Linked Data (DBpedia)
tied to a large corpus (Wikipedia).
- Snippet Retrieval Track: studying the generation of informative snippets with sufficient information
to determine the relevancy of search results.
- Show Me Your Code Track: asking participants to submit system components (in particular feedback)
rather than results.
- Tweet Contextualization Track: retrieving synthetic contextual information from Wikipedia in
response to a tweet with a URL on a small terminal like a phone.
Lab Coordinators: Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Amsterdam (NL), Saarland
University/MPI (DE), and the track organizers.
Lab Webpage: http://inex.mmci.uni-saarland.de/

PAN - Uncovering Plagiarism, Authorship, and Social Software Misuse
PAN offers three tasks:
- Plagiarism Detection. This task features a new plagiarism corpus based on the ClueWeb09, the new search
engine ChatNoir which indexes the corpus, the cloud-based algorithm evaluation architecture TIRA, and
for the first time, real plagiarism cases. At the conference, keynotes about cross-language plagiarism
detection will be held by Roberto Navigli (Università La Sapienza), and Ralf Steinberger (European
Commission, JRC).
- Author Identification. This task focuses on identifying sexual predators in chat logs and on authorship
verification. Moreover, it features for the first time real cases of disputed authorship.
- Quality Flaw Prediction in Wikipedia. This task is newly introduced, and it is about identifying
Wikipedia articles which contain certain information quality flaws. It generalizes the vandalism
detection task of last year.
Lab Coordinators: Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (DE), U. Politécnica de Valencia (ES), U. of the Aegean
(GR), Bar-Ilan University (IL), Illinois Institute of Technology (US), Duquesne University (US), and
U. of Lugano (CH).
Lab web page: http://pan.webis.de

QA4MRE- Question Answering for Machine Reading Evaluation 
The goal of QA4MRE is to evaluate Machine Reading abilities through Question Answering and Reading
Comprehension Tests.  The task focuses on the reading of single documents and the identification of the
answers to a set of questions about information that is stated or implied in the text. Questions are in the
form of multiple choice, each having five options, and only one correct answer. The participating
systems will be required to answer the questions by choosing in each case one answer from the five
alternatives. Systems should be able to use knowledge from given texts which may be used to assist with
answering the questions, anyway, the principal answer is to be found among the facts contained in the test
documents given. Two additional pilots are also proposed:
- Processing Modality and Negation for Machine Reading: aimed at evaluating whether systems are able to
understand extra-propositional aspects of meaning like modality and negation. 
- Machine Reading of Biomedical Texts about Alzheimer: aimed at setting questions in the biomedical
domain with a special focus on the Alzheimer disease.
Lab Coordinators: UNED (ES), ISI (US), CELCT (IT), University of Limerick (IE), University of Antwerp
(BE).  
Lab Webpage: http://celct.fbk.eu/QA4MRE/

RepLab 2012
Online Reputation Management deals with the image that online media project about individuals and
organizations.  The aim is to bring together the Information Access research community with
representatives from the Online Reputation Management industry, with the goals of (i) establishing a
five-year roadmap that includes a description of the language technologies required in terms of
resources, algorithms, and applications; (ii) specifying suitable evaluation methodologies and
metrics; and (iii) developing of test collections that enable systematic comparison of algorithms and
reliable benchmarking of commercial systems. Two shared tasks on Twitter data are offered: 
(i) a monitoring task, where the goal is to thematically cluster tweets including a company's name as a step
towards early alerting on issues that may damage the company's reputation.
(ii) a profiling task, where the goal is annotating tweets according to their polarity for reputation
(i.e. as to whether their content has positive/negative implications for the company's reputation).  
Lab Coordinators: Llorente & Cuenca, U. Amsterdam, UNED
Lab Webpage: http://www.limosine-project.eu/events/replab2012

WORKSHOP

CLEFeHealth 2012
CLEFeHealth 2012 is a one-day workshop on cross-language evaluation of methods, applications, and
resources for eHealth document analysis with a focus on written and spoken natural-language
processing. We invite research, industry and government representatives to develop with us a roadmap
towards the vision of using systematically evaluated ICT tools to analyse and integrate eHealth
documents across languages, genres, and jargons. We call for 1-2 page abstracts on: (a) evaluation of
mono-and multilingual methods, applications 
and resources for eHealth document analysis; and (b) development of statistical and user-feedback based
evaluation protocols, settings, methods and measures for cross-language evaluation of methods,
applications, and resources for eHealth document analysis. We have a double-blind review process, so
please note that the submission deadline is May 2012.
Lab Coordinators: National ICT Australia (NICTA)
Lab Webpage: www.nicta.com.au/clefehealth2012

================================
Pamela Forner
CELCT (web: www.celct.it)
Center for the Evaluation of Language and Communication Technologies
Via alla Cascata 56/c 
38100 Povo - TRENTO -Italy

email: forner <at> celct.it
tel.:  +39 0461 314 804
fax:  +39 0461 314 846
 
Secretary Phone:  +39 0461 314 870

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora

Albert Gatt | 1 Mar 2012 14:02
Picon
Favicon

Generation Challenges 2012: Announcement and CFP

Announcement of Tasks and Call for Papers

GENERATION CHALLENGES 2012
--------------------------

To be held in conjunction with INLG 2012, 30 May-01 June 2012, Starved Rock, IL, USA.

Over the past five years, there has been a lot of activity in
connection with shared tasks in Natural Language Generation (NLG).
Six separate sets of shared tasks each with its own data and team of
organisers have so far been run: TUNA (Gatt et al.), GREC (Belz et
al.), GIVE (Koller et al.), QG (Rus et al.), HOO (Dale and Kilgarriff)
SR (Belz, White et al.).  The Pilot Attribute Selection for
Generating Referring Expressions (ASGRE) Challenge took place in 2007
(TUNA); the Referring Expression Generation (REG) Challenge in 2008
(TUNA, GREC); the first, second and third Generation Challenges umbrella
events encompassing diverse sets of shared tasks, took place in 2009
(TUNA, GREC and GIVE), 2010 (QG, GREC and GIVE) and 2011 (HOO, SR); other shared tasks
are being prepared.  More information about all of these activities
can be found via the links on the Generation Challenges 2012 homepage:

In order to continue to provide a common forum for these activities,
we are organising Generation Challenges 2012 (GenChal'12), an umbrella
event designed to bring together a variety of shared-task evaluation
efforts that involve the generation of natural language.  For some of the 
tasks, evaluation results and participating systems will be presented at 
the Generation Challenges 2012 Special Session at the 7TH International 
Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG'12).  The session will follow the
format of previous GenChal results sessions, with presentations of
results by the organisers of the different shared tasks, as well as
presentations of proposals for new shared tasks in the Task Proposals
Track. As at GenChal'10 and GenChal'11, we envisage having a poster session where
participants in the various shared tasks will have the opportunity to
present their approaches and results.  In addition, we are planning to
have break-out sessions for individual tasks, providing further
opportunity for current and future task participants to exchange ideas
and feed back to the organisers.


1. Shared Tasks:
 - - - - - - - -

The GenChal'12 meeting will be held at INLG'12 in Starved Rock, IL, USA,
30 May-01 June 2012, but the timetables of the individual tasks are not
completely aligned, and they will be organised independently (for
details, please refer to the Call for Participation for each
task). The following is the list of tasks that are running in 2012:

1. Surface Realisation Task 2012: (White, Wanner, Bohnet, Hogan, Stent,
Belz et al.): Generation of sentences from shallow and deep input
represenations. Call for Participation in preparation.

2. Helping Our Own (HOO) (Dale): Text-to-text generation
task aiming to improve the quality of texts, in particular those
written by non-native speakers.  Call for Registration has been 
The official HOO results session will be hosted at BEA'12. A summary report
will be presented at GenChal'12.

2. QG'12 (Rus et al.): Question Generation task aiming to generate questions
given answers in the form of Natural Language text. Although the QG task will not 
be running in 2012, there will be an update report presented at GenChal'12.


2. Track on Proposals for Future Tasks:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

We invite submissions of papers describing ideas for future shared
tasks in the general area of language generation.  Proposed tasks can
be in the area of core NLG, or in other research areas in which
language is generated, e.g. text-to-text generation (including MT and
summarisation), combining core NLG and MT, or combining core NLG and
text summarisation.  Submissions should describe possible future tasks
in detail, including information regarding organisers, task
description, motivating theoretical interest and/or application
context, size and state of completion of data to be used, and
evaluation plans.


3. Instructions for Paper Submissions:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Submissions in the Task Proposals Track should be no more than 4 (four) 
pages long excluding citations, and should
follow the ACL'12 guidelines using the style files provided via the
ACL 2012 homepage.  Papers should be sent in PDF format by email to
nlg-stec <at> itri.brighton.ac.uk.  Task Proposal papers should be submitted 
no later than 15 April 2012.

Submissions will be reviewed by at least 3 members of the Generation
Challenges Steering Committee (see below).  As reviewing will not be
blind, there is no need to anonymise papers.  This is not intended to be
a selective process, but the organisers reserve the right to reject papers 
which do not fall within the scope of the GenChal initiative, or which do 
not follow guidelines.

Accepted submissions will be included in the INLG'12 proceedings, but
the page limit for camera-ready versions has not yet been finalised
(the final limit will depend on how many submissions there are).


6. Dates:
- - - - -

Paper submission        10th April 2012
Notification of acceptance 15th April 2012
Submission of camera-ready papers 22nd April 2012
INLG'12   30 May-01 June 2012

NB: Submission deadlines for the GenChal'12 Shared Tasks differ and can be
found in the calls for participation for the tasks.


7. Generation Challenges Steering Committee:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------

Anja Belz, NLTG, University of Brighton, UK
Albert Gatt, University of Malta and University of Aberdeen, UK
Alexander Koller, Saarland University, Germany
Robert Dale, Macquarie University, Australia
Kevin Knight, ISI, University of Southern California, USA
Chris Mellish, University of Aberdeen, UK
Johanna Moore, University of Edinburgh, UK
Amanda Stent, AT&T Labs, USA
Kristina Striegnitz, Union College, USA


8. Organisation:
- - - - - - - - -

Anja Belz, NLTG, University of Brighton, UK
Albert Gatt, University of Malta and University of Aberdeen, UK
Alexander Koller, Saarland University, Germany
Kristina Striegnitz, Union College, US

Generation Challenges 2012 homepage: http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/research/genchal12
Generation Challenges 2012 email: nlg-stec <at> itri.brighton.ac.uk


_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
Graham White | 1 Mar 2012 14:41
Picon
Favicon

Re: Research work

I imagine that, if you had the computer you did the work on,
then computer forensics could establish the date of drafts and so on.
But I would think that, in practice, anyone would be so worried about 
the risk of exposure that you could get them to back down.

Graham

On 01/03/12 07:14, fatima zuhra wrote:
> Dear all,
> I want to know if someone shares a copy of his/her research work with
> another person for review or checking purpose and the other person sends
> that for publication (claiming the authorship) then how the researcher
> will prove that it is his/her own research and not that of the other one?
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
> Corpora mailing list
> Corpora <at> uib.no
> http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora

Patrick Juola | 1 Mar 2012 16:25
Picon

Re: Research work



On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:14 AM, fatima zuhra <fateeshah <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear all,
 
I want to know if someone shares a copy of his/her research work with another person for review or checking purpose and the other person sends that for publication (claiming the authorship) then how the researcher will prove that it is his/her own research and not that of the other one?

There are several ways in which this can be done, but they're all generally tricky and time consuming.    There is a (sub)discipline called forensic linguistics that could analyze the language used in the publication and determine who's writing style it shows.   There is another discipline called digital forensics that could examine the relevant computers and see on which computer the document was written --- obviously if you have old drafts on your computer and I don't have any on mine, then you were the author.

Or more simply, you can simply complain to the relevant journal editor and ask them to investigate.  Editors tend to take this kind of issue quite seriously.

If you're interested in learning more about this from a theoretical perspective, you can go to evllabs.com and check out the JGAAP computer program (and associated monograph) that describes how this is done.  I'll be happy to explain more.

If, on the other hand, this is not merely a theoretical issue, but an actual problem --- I am associated with a consulting company called Juola and Associates (we haven't yet set up our web site or I'd send you there) and my business manager, Patrick Brennan (pbrennan <at> jcomputing.com), would be happy to look into the problem for you.   

Warmest regards,
Patrick (Juola) 
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
ELRA ELDA Information | 1 Mar 2012 18:22

LREC 2012 - Registration is now OPEN!

[Apologies for multiple postings]

The online registration to LREC 2012 is now open at http://www.lrec-conf.org/lrec2012/?-Registration-

More information: http://www.lrec-conf.org/lrec2012/
Contact: registration <at> lrec-conf.org


_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
Mike Scott | 1 Mar 2012 19:37
Favicon

Re: Research work

If this is prospective as opposed to an existing case, deposit a copy of what you're writing with a respected third party before you send it to the other person for review.

Mike

On 01/03/2012 07:14, fatima zuhra wrote:
Dear all,
 
I want to know if someone shares a copy of his/her research work with another person for review or checking purpose and the other person sends that for publication (claiming the authorship) then how the researcher will prove that it is his/her own research and not that of the other one?
 
Thanks. 


_______________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora Corpora mailing list Corpora <at> uib.no http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora

-- Mike Scott *** If you publish research which uses WordSmith, do let me know so I can include it at http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/corpus_linguistics_links/papers_using_wordsmith.htm *** Aston University and Lexical Analysis Software Ltd. mike <at> lexically.net www.lexically.net
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
Sandra Maria Aluísio | 1 Mar 2012 21:26
Picon
Picon
Favicon

FIRST CALL FOR PAPERS - ELC 2012

======================================
XI CORPUS LINGUISTICS MEETING (ELC 2012)
www.nilc.icmc.usp.br/elc-ebralc2012/

University of Sao Paulo - USP
Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science
Sao Carlos / SP, Brazil
September 13-15, 2012
======================================

FIRST CALL FOR PAPERS

The XI Corpus Linguistics Meeting invites professionals from the areas
of Linguistics, Computer Science, Historical Linguistics, Applied
Linguistics, Cognitive Linguistics, Information Sciences, and other
areas that use Corpus Linguistics to submit work in this
multidisciplinary area that is completed or under development. The XI
ELC will be held between September 13 and 15, 2012 at USP's Institute
of Mathematics and Computer Science, the headquarters of the
Interinstitutional Center for Computational Linguistics (NILC), in São
Carlos / SP, immediately after the VI Brazilian School of
Computational Linguistics, to be held on September 11 and 12, 2012.

This edition of ELC intends to address the topic "Technological
convergence for the processing and analysis of language: new
technologies for linguistic research and linguistic research for new
technologies." Natural Language Processing (NLP), also known as
Computational Linguistics and Corpus Linguistics (CL) have had a
significant development in recent decades, particularly in Europe and
the United States, mainly for the English language. In Brazil, despite
considerable advances in the last decade, these areas are not yet
widespread, because they are concentrated in a handful of
universities, and are part of larger areas such as Computing and
Linguistics. With this year's topic, we intend to highlight the
relevance of the tasks that emerge when NLP and LC converge.

We will select papers dealing with completed and substantial research,
presenting relevant results to the study area (whether practical or
theoretical), and work in progress, with partial results, software
proposals or demonstrations, or proposals for relevant research. There
will be no parallel sessions. It is expected that papers submitted
make it clear how the proposed research makes use of Corpus
Linguistics, by making syntheses and / or advances in the theory,
methodology, or assumptions, and presenting empirical results in areas
related to Corpus Linguistics.

The topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

* Methodological Foundations of Corpus Linguistics;
* Compilation of Corpus;
* Web as Corpus;
* Building of Support Tools for Corpus Creation and Manipulation;
* Development of Analysis Tools for Annotated Corpora;
* Corpus annotation at various language levels and for various tasks
of Natural Language Processing;
* Morphology;
* Phonetics and Phonology;
* Lexis (Lexicology, Lexicography and Terminology / Phraseology);
* Syntax;
* Semantics;
* Text, Gender and Discourse;
* Metaphors;
* Pragmatics;
* Language Teaching;
* Terminology and specialized languages;
* Human and Machine Translation;
* Support Tools for Writing;
* Machine Learning for tasks of Natural Language Processing;
* Automatic Summarization using Corpora;
* Analysis of Text Readability;
* Text Simplification and Elaboration;
* Text Mining using Large Corpora.

GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSION OF PAPERS

Here are the guidelines for submission of papers for the two formats
explained above.

(1) COMPLETED RESEARCH WORK

These must be submitted as short papers (maximum 1800 words) either
for oral or poster presentation, both of which enjoy the same status
and the same treatment. The format of submission is the same, and both
the author and the committee of reviewers may indicate the format of
presentation. However, we emphasize that the final choice will be made
by the scientific committee, taking into account the format which most
effectively and informatively conveys the contents of the study.

The following are the guidelines for submission:

Papers should
- have between 1000 and 1800 words (written in Portuguese or English,
which will determine the language of presentation)
- have a centered title in capital letters, Times New Roman, font 12, bold;
- skip a line and start the text, written in Times New Roman, font 12,
normal, without footnotes, phonetic symbols or unusual characters to
the  Microsoft Word standard.

Authors should not identify themselves in the body of the text so as
not to impair the evaluation process.

Short papers should contain the following parts:
- background;
- short review of the literature;
- goal(s) of work;
- methodology;
- result(s);
- conclusion / recommendations.

Articles submitted will be subject to evaluation by the Scientific
Committee, which shall observe the following aspects: relevance of the
work for Corpus Linguistics, research quality (technical,
methodological, analytical), text quality (clarity and objectiveness),
attention to the guidelines, originality. The acceptance letter will
also specify the form of presentation - oral or poster.

(2) WORK IN PROGRESS

This session of the ELC is intended for presentation of papers about
research in Corpus Linguistics thathas not yet been completed or
defended, and whose results are not yet significant or expressive.
They must be submitted as an abstract of 500 words maximum for
presentation in a special session consisting of a first part called
"one minute of madness", in which the work is presented with one slide
in 1 minute. This is followed by presentation of the work on the
author's own laptop, at a table with chairs to seat presenter and
those interested in the presentation.
 The following are the guidelines for submission:

Papers should
- have between 300 and 500 words (written in Portuguese or English,
which will determine the language of presentation)
- have a centered title in capital letters, Times New Roman, font 12, bold;
- have the author's name (and name of supervisor, if applicable) and
institution indicating line of research, starting date of the survey
and probabledate of completion or defense.
- skip a line and start the text, written in Times New Roman, font 12,
normal, without footnotes, phonetic symbols or unusual characters to
the  Microsoft Word standard.

The body of the abstract should indicate the work proposed, the
research questions and the methodology selected for investigation, as
well as expected results. References should be limited to 05, and
indicated below the abstract.

IMPORTANT DATES

Deadline for short papers/abstracts: May 30, 2012
Notification to authors: July 6, 2012
Date of event: September 13 to 15, 2012

SUBMISSION

Short papers and abstracts should only be submitted via JEMS
(https://submissoes.sbc.org.br/) by the deadline indicated above. More
information about the submission, using the system, will be given
soon.

EMAIL CONTACT: elc.secretaria.2012  <at>  gmail.com

ORGANIZING COMMITTEE

Sandra Maria Aluísio (ICMC-USP)
Stella Tagnin (FFLCH-USP)
Simone Sarmento (UFRGS)
Maria José B. Finatto (UFRGS)
Magali Sanches Duran (NILC-USP)
Carmen Dayrell (COMET-USP)
Amanda Rocha (ICMC-USP)
Arnaldo Candido Junior (ICMC-USP)
Lianet Sepúlveda Torres (ICMC-USP)
Carolina Scarton (ICMC-USP)
Danilo Murakami (FFLCH-USP)
Joacyr Oliveira (FFLCH-USP)
Malila Prado (FFLCH-USP)
Mara Sobreira (FFLCH-USP)
Rozane Rebechi (FFLCH-USP)
Jhonata Pereira Martins (ICMC-USP)
Marina Coimbra (ICMC-USP)

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE
Aldebaro Klautau (UFPA)
Aline Villavicencio (UFRGS)
Ana Eliza Pereira Bocorny (PUC-RS)
Ariani Di Felippo (UFSCAR/PPGL)
Carmen Dayrell (FFLCH/COMET)
Cláudia Zavaglia (UNESP/IBILCE)
Cleci Regina Bevilacqua (UFRGS)
Deise Prina Dutra (UFMG)
Diana Santos (University of Oslo)
Diva Cardoso de Camargo (UNESP/IBILCE)
Elisa Duarte Teixeira (FFLCH/COMET)
Eloize Seno (IFSP/São Carlos)
Flávia Hirata-Vale (UFSCar/PPGL)
Gabriel de Ávila Othero (UFRGS)
Gladis Maria Barcellos Almeida (UFSCAR/PPGL)
Guilherme Fromm (UFU)
Helena Caseli  (UFSCar/DC)
Heliana Mello (UFMG)
Isa Mara da Rosa Alves (UNISINOS)
Ivandre Paraboni (EACH/USP)
João Luis Garcia Rosa (ICMC/USP)
Magali Duran (NILC/USP)
Marcia Cançado (UFMG)
Maria Cláudia Freitas (Linguateca; PUC-RJ)
Maria das Graças Volpe Nunes (ICMC/USP)
Maria José B. Finatto (UFRGS)
Markus J. Weininger (UFSC)
Patrícia Tosqui Lucks  (ICEA)
Sandra Maria Aluísio (ICMC/USP)
Sara Candeias (Universidade de Coimbra)
Simone Sarmento (UFRGS)
Sonia Zyngier (UFRJ)
Stella Tagnin (FFLCH/USP)
Tania Shepherd (UERJ)
Thaïs Cristófaro Alves da Silva (UFMG)
Thiago Pardo (ICMC/USP)
Tommaso Raso (UFMG)
Tony Berber Sardinha (PUC-SP)
Valéria Feltrim (UEM)
Vander Viana (Queen's University Belfast)
Vera Strube de Lima (PUC-RS)
Vera Vasilévski (UFSC)
Violeta Quental (PUC-RJ)

ORGANIZATION: NILC, ICMC-USP, FFLCH-USP, UFRGS

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora

fatima zuhra | 2 Mar 2012 06:47
Picon
Favicon

Re: Research work


Thanks to all for your valuable suggestions. These kind of cases usually arise in cases when someone shares his/her research in order to improve it.
 

--- On Fri, 2/3/12, Eiman Al-Shammari <eiman.tamah <at> gmail.com> wrote:

From: Eiman Al-Shammari <eiman.tamah <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Corpora-List] Research work
To: "fatima zuhra" <fateeshah <at> yahoo.com>
Received: Friday, 2 March, 2012, 2:23 AM

how did you give it to them...if you have an email then forward it to the journal 

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 10:14 AM, fatima zuhra <fateeshah <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear all,
 
I want to know if someone shares a copy of his/her research work with another person for review or checking purpose and the other person sends that for publication (claiming the authorship) then how the researcher will prove that it is his/her own research and not that of the other one?
 
Thanks. 

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora


_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora
Stefan Bordag | 2 Mar 2012 10:16
Picon
Favicon

Korean and Japanese stemming

Dear all,

Does anyone know whether someone wrote a simple Porter-stemmer or 
similar set of rules for stemming korean texts? Same for Japanese texts. 
It doesn't need to be anything fancy. But using google translate and 
search engine results turns out to not lead anywhere, or I am looking in 
the wrong places.

Thank you very much in advance,
Stefan Bordag

--

-- 
--
---------------------------------------------
- Dr. Stefan Bordag                         -
- 0341 49 26 196                            -
- sbordag <at> informatik.uni-leipzig.de         -
---------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE from this page: http://mailman.uib.no/options/corpora
Corpora mailing list
Corpora <at> uib.no
http://mailman.uib.no/listinfo/corpora


Gmane