Jim Devine | 1 Mar 2006 01:16
Picon

Re: Indian Growth and Development

raghu: >If the Indian economy can keep growing at the present rates
(>8%), it seems as if substantially higher per-capita incomes are
possible.<

persistent 8%? what about balance of payments constraints? how quickly
was S. Korea growing before its bust?

--
Jim Devine / Bust Big Brother Bush!

"To be positive: To be mistaken at the top of one's voice." -- 
Ambrose Bierce, Devil's Dictionary.

ken hanly | 1 Mar 2006 01:34
Picon
Favicon

U. of Philippines declares itself emergency free zone

NOTE: This is the main campus at Diliman, Quezon City,
Metro Manila.

'DILIMAN  REPUBLIC'  DECLARES  SELF  AS
EMERGENCY-FREE

MANILA, March 1, 2006 (MALAYA) STUDENTS and professors
yesterday declared University of the Philippines as a
state of emergency-free zone, saying their academic
freedom would not be muzzled by Arroyo’s Proclamation
1017.

Professors said they would hold alternative classes to
explain the effects of the proclamation, especially on
people’s rights.

"Kakausapin natin ang mga faculty members to still
hold classes so we can discuss the meaning of this
proclamation, our rights and what we should do," Maris
Diokno, a professor of history, said in a press
conference at the Palma hall.

The Palma hall, formerly known as the Arts and
Sciences building, was the center of student protest
actions during the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos.

"Hindi ko alam kung pasasalamatan ko si GMA (Arroyo)
for 1017 because now we can explain what martial law
was. Pagkakataon ito para maunawaan natin ang
sitwasyon," she said.
(Continue reading)

Yoshie Furuhashi | 1 Mar 2006 01:49
Picon
Favicon

Re: responding to shemano

Doug wrote:

> They don't seem like flamebait to me.

I've seen flames, and I've also been flamed.  I can't say I've read
all of David's postings, but the ones I've seen are nothing like
flamebaits, and sometimes I wish that leftists who strongly disagree
with me were as courteous as David.  :-0  David reminds me of a
conservative man -- a hedge fund manager -- who was subscribed to my
blog and left comments occasionally.  Alas, I haven't had time to
update my blog, and I've lost touch with him.

Yoshie Furuhashi
<http://montages.blogspot.com>
<http://monthlyreview.org>
<http://mrzine.org>

Louis Proyect | 1 Mar 2006 02:53
Picon
Favicon

Re: Indian Growth and Development

Raghu:
>Louis,
>Thanks for the explanation. Surely though things are more complicated
>than this? If the Indian economy can keep growing at the present rates
>(>8%), it seems as if substantially higher per-capita incomes are
>possible.

I am quite sure that some Indians will do extremely well in the years to
come. Some segments of the Indian economy are quite dynamic. However, the
vast majority of the rural population--as in China--will be left out of
this. Peasants in the 18th century, during an earlier phase of "primitive
accumulation" in Western Europe were absorbed into an expanding industrial
sector. I don't see that happening in India or China. Basically, these are
forgotten people as the rash of suicides would indicate.

Anthony | 1 Mar 2006 03:25

Re: Indian Growth and Development

S. Korea kept growing since the early 1960s, with a bump in 1973-74 (oil crisis), and 1979-early 80s due to
heavy investment in heavy industry (oil price rise plus inflationary spending), but grew throughout the
1980s and 1990s, until the big break in 1997.  It's getting back to decent growth, after major adjustment.  I
believe the Korean won has strenghthened substantially since its fall in 1997 that exporters have
started complaining.

Korea reall did not have a major balance of payments problem nor an international debt (although the number
was significant) because of its export surplus.

I am sure Marty will have a better handle on the data. cheers, a
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony P. D'Costa, Professor
Comparative International Development
Abe Fellow (2005-06)
University of Washington
1900 Commerce Street
Tacoma, WA 98402, USA
Phone: (253) 692-4462
Fax :  (253) 692-5718
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Jim Devine wrote:

> raghu: >If the Indian economy can keep growing at the present rates
> (>8%), it seems as if substantially higher per-capita incomes are
> possible.<
>
> persistent 8%? what about balance of payments constraints? how quickly
> was S. Korea growing before its bust?
>
(Continue reading)

michael a. lebowitz | 1 Mar 2006 03:31
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: responding to shemano

At 20:49 28/02/2006, Yoshie wrote:
>Doug wrote:
>
>>They don't seem like flamebait to me.
>
>I've seen flames, and I've also been flamed.  I can't say I've read
>all of David's postings, but the ones I've seen are nothing like
>flamebaits,

For the record, I never suggested that David flames. Rather, based
upon my only (unrequited) exchange with him, I concluded that he
wasn't seriously enquiring and, accordingly, I wondered why people
spent time jousting with him--- which I regarded as a waste of time.
Clearly, many people on the list don't feel this way and enjoy the
repartee. Different strokes.
         cheers,
         michael

Michael A. Lebowitz
Professor Emeritus
Economics Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6

Currently based in Venezuela. Can be reached at
Residencias Anauco Suites
Departamento 601
Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1
Caracas, Venezuela
(58-212) 573-4111
(Continue reading)

Doug Henwood | 1 Mar 2006 03:50
Picon
Favicon

Re: Indian Growth and Development

Anthony wrote:

>Korea reall did not have a major balance of payments problem nor an
>international debt (although the number was significant) because of
>its export surplus.

And in the early days, U.S. military aid really helped the BoP,
enabling SK to borrow more aggressively.

Doug

Anthony | 1 Mar 2006 04:23

Re: Indian Growth and Development

In fact this is where the dependendistas got it wrong (I was strongly influenced by dependency arguments in
my graduate school days and even today some on the left question my credentials on this ground).  The idea of
autarky (or some degree of) is theoretically necessary for autonmous growth and development (which was
essentially structural change).  The East Asian economies of the 1960s did maintain some degree of
autonomy and hence could engage in the development process.  But as Doug alludes to below, the US
protective umbrella was a very important factor for their growth because it gave the national states the
political space to operate.  So it was a peculiar kind of imperialism because the US was incharge (and these
were often geopolitically subservient states).  Yet with good economic management by the state and in
some cases tight political control over labor (not necessarily hol
 ding
wages back), investment, production, exports, and reinvestment was maintained at a very high rate.  The US
did not meddle in economic matters, the states borrowed heavily (greater flexibility) as opposed to
encouraging FDI, the US absorbed exports, and favored low exchange rate to give these economies room to
grow through exports.  The lesson is that competent states are necessary but not sufficient, autarky is
necessary but not suffcient.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Anthony P. D'Costa, Professor
Comparative International Development
Abe Fellow (2005-06)
University of Washington
1900 Commerce Street
Tacoma, WA 98402, USA
Phone: (253) 692-4462
Fax :  (253) 692-5718
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Doug Henwood wrote:

> Anthony wrote:
(Continue reading)

soula avramidis | 1 Mar 2006 07:03
Picon
Favicon

Re: shi'ite vs. sunni query

There are shiite death squads organised by the pro american government going on a killing spree on one side and then the zarqawi faction, which is considered a US intelligence asset on the other side. both are working hard towards a full fledged sectarian war which would make for a failure of iran policy so far in iraq and legitimisation of US occupation.

Jim Devine <jdevine03-8a+P9i1ojmF8zQARNC3f2A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On 2/26/06, Leigh Meyers quoted:
> "With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion." - Steven Weinberg<

have good people never done evil things when influence by secular
ideas? The neo-cons, I am sure, are not al l "bad people" but have done
bad things nonetheless, without the influence of religion.

--
Jim Devine / Bust Big Brother Bush!
"To be positive: To be mistaken at the top of one's voice." --
Ambrose Bierce, Devil's Dictionary.

Relax. Yahoo! Mail virus scanning helps detect nasty viruses!
Fred Feldman | 1 Mar 2006 07:51

Bolivia's Minister of Presidency: "A government of the poor, for the poor"

IV Online magazine : IVP375 - February 2006

Bolivia

"A government of the poor, for the poor"

Exclusive interview with Juan Ramon Quintana
Juan Ramon Quintana

Juan Ramon Quintana had hardly had time to settle into his new job as Minister of the Presidency (which is what the Prime Minister is called in Bolivia) when he welcomed our Bolivian correspondent to his office in the Government Palace and gave him the interview that follows. He took the occasion to discuss the composition of the new government, which has a radical profile, as well as the tasks facing Evo Morales and his ministers. The interview was first published in the February 2nd issue of Rouge, weekly paper of the LCR (French section of the Fourth International.

Rouge: The governmental cabinet does not come across as one that will bring tranquillity to the markets and to the United States. Is this a political signal that Evo Morales wanted to send?

Juan Ramon Quintana - I think that this cabinet brings together the aspirations for change in Bolivian political life, insofar as it is made up of personalities who are close to the people, close to ordinary people. The ministers are people who have worked with the social movements, who have fought against the neo-liberal order, and they, more than anyone else, illustrate the virtues of resistance. They have the opportunity to learn how to govern.

They have been chosen according to several criteria: this is a constellation that is representative of Bolivian society. There are four women, which is a first in Bolivian history. It is also a cabinet that reflects the participation of social movements. There is also a regional representation, there are intellectuals and university professors, as well as businessmen. In other words, we have managed to find a democratic, plural and coherent formula that illustrates this desire for change.

The appointment of Andres Soliz Rada also comes over as a strong signal to the oil companies, insofar as he has always defended the nationalization of gas, without making any concessions to them.

Andres Soliz is a great fighter, who has always fought for the state to have sovereignty over its natural resources. He expresses an ideological struggle against the forms of imperialist domination of the United States, whether or not they are explicit. It is the continuity of the frustrated desire of nationalism that has existed since the 1930s. He is the heir of this current. He is not only an intellectual, but also someone who has taken part in social struggles.

We were surprised by the appointment of Casimira Rodriguez to head the Ministry of Justice. It is an incredibly strong signal to appoint a cleaning woman to this post!

It is the historic demand of a big majority of cleaning women who have always been marginalized, who are invisible to society, mistreated and excluded, treated like animals in our society. These women do not occupy a domestic space, but suffer every form of violence. Casimira Rodriguez illustrates the struggle against this centuries-long injustice against women of whom the majority do not have social security, citizenship, sometimes not even an identity card.

As concerns the military general staff, will there also be surprises?

I think that we are above all going to insist on the line laid down by the president, with criteria of selection based on respect for institutions, on respect for moral and ethical conduct, and lastly on a moral and patriotic reserve to defend the nation. These are the criteria that will guide our choice in this domain.

You have previously stated that the police and the army will no longer be an appendage of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), which coordinates the anti-drug struggle in Bolivia and in Latin America. Do you maintain this attitude?

Yes. A chapter of the political history of Bolivia, these last twenty years, has been the lending out of soldiers and police, who have been subordinated to foreign governments. Our government is going to restore sovereignty, by regaining it at the heart of the state, with the army and the police.

Are we also entering into anew cycle of relations with Chile?

Yes, we think so, we are optimistic on this subject. Two new presidents are together entering a new epoch for Latin America. There is a sincere leadership on the part of the Socialist Party in Chile. Chile is showing signs of breaking with the traditional conservatism that has characterized its relations with Bolivia. Our president has the strongest historical legitimacy to be able to resolve the dispute that has separated us from this country for such a long time.

Is the appointment of Soliz Rada also the sign that the relations between Bolivia and its neighbours on the energy question are going to change?

Yes, because the changes in the organization of the executive power are going to illustrate the profound transformations of the state, first of all on the economic level. We are going towards a mixed economy, no longer a 100 per cent market economy. An economy where the state will be a central actor of the productive sector, where it will be the organiser of the economy, on a national level and abroad, for example in the energy domain.

The time has also come to put in place a government of the poor by the poor, with a presence of indigenous people that is no longer the caricature that was offered by Sanchez de Lozada from 1993 to 1997. We also need the presence of women. But this government is showing signs of being effective in terms of public investments, of the fight against corruption, discrimination and impunity.

These will be the axes of transformation of the state. Corruption was the weapon of state functionaries. Exclusion was the sign of racism. All that is going to change with this government.

One of the balance sheets we can draw from the inauguration of Evo Morales seems to be the symbolic affirmation of a rapprochement with Cuba and Venezuela, within what is being called “the axis of good”. Do you share this perception?

I think that the relations between Bolivia, Havana and Caracas are taking on a new dimension on the level of cooperation in the fields of education, health, technique, etc. That is also reinforcing the nationalist line of our government on the energy question. There is a convergence with certain policies of Cuba and Venezuela. This axis is going to have to all intents and purposes the same status, in terms of its relevance, as the Buenos Aires, Brasilia, Montevideo, Asuncion axis has for Bolivia.

In the region, our insertion must be based on energy, while our cooperation with the Caribbean has more to do with social cooperation. These two axes are an equation for the unity of Latin America. There is no supremacy of one of the two axes over the other. They are complementary axes, which enable us to maintain an equilibrium in the region and to be less vulnerable to external instability.

It is a virtuous equilibrium where, for the first time in its history, Bolivia has an incredibly important weight for exercising an indigenous leadership. We are going to export our specific leadership in the region.

Are you going to develop a “coca diplomacy”, in favour of its depenalisation?

Yes, we are going to insist in Europe, in Asia and elsewhere, on this policy which the president has called “zero drug traffic, but not zero cocalero”. What Evo Morales means is that we have to revalorise coca through its many possible uses, not only commercial but also and especially medical, for the health of humanity.

We have to give the coca leaf a humanitarian connotation. That obliges us to extend our markets for legal consumption of coca, in the first place with our neighbours. Because of the criminalisation of the coca leaf in recent years, we cannot make visible what could be called the other frontiers of the coca leaf. They have tarred us with this question, to the point of making our people doubt its own beliefs concerning this leaf and its importance in our culture.

Despite the important post you hold, you remain a personality who is not well known, even in Bolivia. Could you introduce yourself to our readers in a few words?

I have had a rather strange personal trajectory. When I was small, I wanted to be a priest, and I finally ended up in the army. Once I was in the army, I wanted to become a lawyer in order to defend those who were poorest and who were mistreated in the army, and that is how I became a sociologist. As a sociologist I wanted to work on the sociology of violence, and I ended up by becoming involved in politics. Now that I am a politician, I am wondering how my engagement as a soldier in the service of the people will end.

 Juan Ramon Quintana is the Minister of the Presidency (prime minister) in Bolivia


Gmane