Cathal Garvey | 8 Nov 2011 16:06
Picon
Gravatar

Protein but not DNA denaturant

Hello all,
I am working on something that may require sequential "washes" of active
enzymes over a bound DNA substrate, with inactivation of the enzymes
after each step. Preferentially, inactivation can be achieved as a rapid
"wash" rather than requiring a lengthly incubation.

Because the preferred method of DNA binding is through a 5'
cellulose-binding aptamer rather than a covalent attachment to gold or
similar, I would like to avoid conditions that could denature the DNA.
So, while heat will denature most proteins readily, it also denatures
DNA, which I am trying to avoid. The cellulose binding aptamer appears
to employ G-quadraplexes which may not refold correctly from certain
perturbations, so the less likely they are to unfold the better.

Urea appears to affect DNA melting temperature and thus probably
structure, and the same goes for Guanadine Hydrochloride, alcohols, etc.

Unless a balance of Urea/Guanidine could be found that spares my DNA
while denaturing the proteins used, I have been looking at some level of
SDS: the aptamer is resistant to at least 0.01% SDS, but I am unsure
what concentration of SDS will be needed to denature proteins?

Likewise, I'm looking at salt-precipitation of proteins, but I am unsure
of which precipitating salts are likely to affect DNA structure.

Are there any protocols out there that might be useful for this
application? A "protein-killing" buffer that is largely benign to DNA?

The proteins in question will be restriction enzymes and a polymerase,
so they are unlikely to be particularly resistant to denaturing conditions.
(Continue reading)

Wolfgang Schechinger | 8 Nov 2011 20:11
Picon
Favicon

Re: Protein but not DNA denaturant

Am Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:06:47 +0000 schrieb Cathal Garvey:

Hi Cathal, 

"phenol saturated water / buffer" comes into my mind, remembering the 
effects of traces of phenol on PCR & digests. 

I never have tested if it really worked, but I frequently used to add a 
tiny amount (1ul or so) of phenol to DNA precipitations with alcohol, 
just to be sure that there was no carryover of active Taq or restriction 
enzymes still bound to DNA while precipitating.

HTH

Wo
AllisonH | 8 Nov 2011 23:54
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Protein but not DNA denaturant

Could you play with pH?  For example, low pH is used to elute antibodies 
off a protein A column, and the eluate needs to be neutralized right 
away so that the antibodies aren't denatured....

It's been a while since I worked with DNA so forgive me if this is 
completely crazy.

Allison

On 08/11/2011 10:06 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am working on something that may require sequential "washes" of active
> enzymes over a bound DNA substrate, with inactivation of the enzymes
> after each step. Preferentially, inactivation can be achieved as a rapid
> "wash" rather than requiring a lengthly incubation.
>
> Because the preferred method of DNA binding is through a 5'
> cellulose-binding aptamer rather than a covalent attachment to gold or
> similar, I would like to avoid conditions that could denature the DNA.
> So, while heat will denature most proteins readily, it also denatures
> DNA, which I am trying to avoid. The cellulose binding aptamer appears
> to employ G-quadraplexes which may not refold correctly from certain
> perturbations, so the less likely they are to unfold the better.
>
> Urea appears to affect DNA melting temperature and thus probably
> structure, and the same goes for Guanadine Hydrochloride, alcohols, etc.
>
> Unless a balance of Urea/Guanidine could be found that spares my DNA
> while denaturing the proteins used, I have been looking at some level of
> SDS: the aptamer is resistant to at least 0.01% SDS, but I am unsure
(Continue reading)

Yoram Gerchman | 11 Nov 2011 12:43
Picon
Picon
Gravatar

Far-RED/NIR live cell labeling - which dye?


Greetings netters
I wish to label DNA in live cyanobacteria cells and detect them by fluorescence
in the Far-Red/NIR region (above 750nm). Does anyone know about a suitable dye?
It needs to emit in >750 nm (preferably >800nm), penetrate live cells and bind
to nucleic acids...

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Webmail Program of Haifa University
Marcelo Lima | 11 Nov 2011 14:01
Picon

barbital buffer alternative

Hi all,

I'm trying to find a substitutive for the barbital buffer (known also as
Veronal buffer), any suggestions?

Cheers,

Marcelo

--

-- 
Marcelo Andrade de Lima
UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo
Departamento de Bioquímica
Disciplina de Biologia Molecular
Rua Três de Maio 100, 4 andar - Vila Clementino, 04044-020
Lab +55 11 55764438 R.1188
Cell +55 11 92725274
mlima@...
DK | 12 Nov 2011 09:00

Re: barbital buffer alternative

In article <mailman.194.1321036099.1853.methods@...>,
Marcelo Lima <mlimagb@...> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm trying to find a substitutive for the barbital buffer (known also as
>Veronal buffer), any suggestions?

Lot of possibilities. Barbital buffers are something out of 19th century 
or so. Other than historical value, they should have no legitimate use
today. What's your application and buffer requirements? 

DK

qPCR NEWS - November 2011 - focus on mirtrons

qPCR NEWS - November 2011 - focus on mirtrons
---------------------------------------------------------------

Dear researcher,
dear Gene Quantification page reader,

Our newsletter informs about the latest news in quantitative real-time
PCR (qPCR and RT-qPCR), which are compiled and summarised on the
Gene Quantification homepage. The focus of this newsletter issue is:

* Introducing the mirtron - http://mirtron.gene-quantification.info
* MIQE qPCR APP for IOS and Android is available - http://MIQE.gene-quantification.info
* MIQE guidelines - online translation service to CHINESE,  JAPANESE,
KOREAN and RUSSIAN

If this newsletter is not displayed correctly by your email client,
please use following  http://qPCRnews.gene-quantification.info
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mirtrons were first identified in Drosophila melanogaster and
Caenorhabditis elegans and are a type of microRNA that are located in
the introns of the mRNA encoding genes. Mirtrons are alternative
precursors for microRNA biogenesis. The short hairpin introns use
splicing to bypass DROSHA cleavage, which is otherwise essential for
the generation of canonical animal microRNAs. Mirtrons arise from the
spliced-out introns and are known to function like classical microRNAs
(miRs) and regulate gene expression, by either mRNA destabilisation,
inhibition of the translation or target mRNA cleavage.
=> http://mirtron.gene-quantification.info

(Continue reading)

sudheer sangeetham | 29 Nov 2011 17:30
Picon

is denature plasmid undergo transformation???

Dear Researchmates

I isolated plasmid from zymogen plasmid isolation kit. After pellet down
the bacterial cells, I added 7x lysis buffer(kit reagent) and by mistake I
resuspend the pellet with pipette( suppose I should not resuspend with
pipette). But when I measure plasmid concentration it was 500 ng/mico
liter. I didnt check the plasmid by running agarose gel. One of my labmate
told chormosomal DNA also could have come when I resuspend with pipette.
When I did bacterial transformation with this plasmid I got few colonies.
Could any please tell, did I do any mistake. Shall I do further steps.
--

-- 
Sudheer Babu.S
Ph.D student
Institute of Biochemistry
Biological Research Center
Szeged,Hungary.
Christian Praetorius | 30 Nov 2011 10:39
Picon

Re: is denature plasmid undergo transformation???

sudheer sangeetham <sudheer.pbm07@...> wrote:

>When I did bacterial transformation with this plasmid I got few colonies.

Did you do a control transformation with another plasmid?

>Could any please tell, did I do any mistake. Shall I do further steps.

Run you DNA on a gel and check, how it looks.

Christian

--

-- 
X-no-Sig: yes
Cathal Garvey | 30 Nov 2011 12:38
Picon
Gravatar

Re: is denature plasmid undergo transformation???

There are many reasons why a transformation would give fewer colonies
than you expect.

If you have not yet checked the plasmid preparation on a gel, then you
should do so. Spectrophotometer readings are only useful to distinguish
DNA from protein or RNA, they tell you next to nothing about *what* DNA
you have.

-Cathal
---
www.indiebiotech.com
twitter.com/onetruecathal
joindiaspora.com/u/cathalgarvey
PGP Public Key: http://bit.ly/CathalGKey

On 29/11/11 16:30, sudheer sangeetham wrote:
> Dear Researchmates
> 
> I isolated plasmid from zymogen plasmid isolation kit. After pellet down
> the bacterial cells, I added 7x lysis buffer(kit reagent) and by mistake I
> resuspend the pellet with pipette( suppose I should not resuspend with
> pipette). But when I measure plasmid concentration it was 500 ng/mico
> liter. I didnt check the plasmid by running agarose gel. One of my labmate
> told chormosomal DNA also could have come when I resuspend with pipette.
> When I did bacterial transformation with this plasmid I got few colonies.
> Could any please tell, did I do any mistake. Shall I do further steps.

Gmane