1 Nov 2011 01:12
Re: Oakland general strike question
Stuart Munckton <stuartmunckton <at> gmail.com>
2011-11-01 00:12:37 GMT
2011-11-01 00:12:37 GMT
====================================================================== Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. ====================================================================== Thanks to everyone who has replied. It looks exciting. On a much smaller scale, back during the lead up to Iraq war, Resistancecalled a student strike for high school students and campus students in Australia. Some on the left on campus argued there was no chance for a serious uni strike, but no one on campus who actually took part was worried it wasn't a total shut down of universities -- they just took part and marched with the higher numbers of highs school students who walked out of their classes. A similar debate happened when resistance called a high school student strike against anti-worker laws in 2006 -- it wasn't a shut down of high schools, but the mobilisation, in a number of places, of hundreds of high school students had a positive impact -- no one worried it wasn't a total shut down, those who could be mobilised were mobilised and it was positive. In a more significant and dramatic fashion, that seems the dynamic at work here -- the call seems important and, from the comments and links around of who has endorsed it etc, it seems it obviously not going to be some sort of total general strike, but any mobilisation will be positive and a step up from no mobilisation, which is what you would get if you didn't put out the call. ________________________________________________ Send list submissions to: Marxism <at> greenhouse.economics.utah.edu Set your options at: http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/marxism%40gmane.org(Continue reading)
RSS Feed