Re: Fight far from over in Honduras: Will pact allow Zelaya to use the bully pulpit?
S. Artesian <sartesian <at> earthlink.net>
2009-11-01 03:17:05 GMT
Certainly you can work within a united front, class-based, around a
constituent assembly, but the fact of the matter is, such an assembly is
incapable of resolving any of the issues that drive the revolution forward.
So any support really has to be critical support.
You think this is about Zelaya getting thrown out of the country? At core?
Not hardly-- that's just the triggering incident.
Democratic revolutions don't come to power period, I would think that much
is painfully obvious based on the last 92 years of history.
Not for nothing, but the demand for a constituent assembly in Russia was
never realized, never acted upon, and never separated from the existence of
the soviets, and the growing demands for the soviets to take power.
And there is no evidence that agitation of for around a constituent assembly
leads to anything beyond retreat, retrenchment of the struggle. I know it's
a tender issue for some, but look at the history of the MNR in Bolivia.
Look at the MAS in Bolivia now and the demand for a constituent assembly.
Where did that go? The constituent assembly, which is the radical version
of a government of "national reconciliation," resolved almost nothing, and
its "sovereignty" was jettisoned by those who proclaimed the CA as central
to democracy.
I don't know that those struggling in Honduras are struggling more for
"democracy" than they are for "socialism." You don't know that either.
What you see is the movement erupting from deep-seated social reasons,
economic reasons, class reasons, that are, in essence, irresolvable by
democracy or a "democratic revoluton."
(Continue reading)