M K Singhal | 1 Jun 2010 05:24
Picon
Favicon

Re: [rti4empowerment] Wake up call

 

The various groups formed for discussing RTI matters are doing very good work. I find all posts very informative and information is power says RTI. But for posts in such groups, RTI would not have got the momentum it has generated despite Govt attempts to subvert its proper implementation. Sec 4 emphasizes that most information concerning PAs should be uploaded on their website. But who cares. In its recent judgement DDA vs CIC, Delhi HC, although considering a matter concerning non compliance of DDA to publish Sec 4 info, deemed it fit not to censure DDA for this lapse but censured CIC for its audacity to call VC DDA to discuss this with him and quashed CIC orders to form a committee to look into the matter. My Bharat Mahan. M k Singhal

From: Rahul <bruntno1 <at> yahoo.com>
To: rti4empowerment <at> yahoogroups.com; Sidharth Misra <sidharthbbsr <at> gmail.com>; Gopalkrishnan iyer <iyer_ga <at> yahoo.com>
Sent: Mon, 31 May, 2010 10:19:48 PM
Subject: Re: [rti4empowerment] Wake up call



I completely agree with you Mr. Iyer
Not just for the asking, such information should be
out out on the Govt. website for free access
Much of the info that is sought should be made available
so that the burden of providing information should
not be used to slow down the process ..

I suspect part of the reason for stalling is using the classic
approach of delaying in order to blunt the enthusiasm
with which the info is sought, thereby hoping to discourage
future requests ...

Talking and ranting aboutnit on internet forums serves no purpose
What is required is practical steps on how to go about getting
the info one needs alongwith names, dates, places and
contact numbers of officials to be contacted for information

Any ideas and tips most welcome

With best wishes,
from
 
Rahul,
Owner/Moderator - The CYBUGLE & 60seconds


--- On Sun, 5/30/10, Gopalkrishnan iyer <iyer_ga <at> yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Gopalkrishnan iyer <iyer_ga <at> yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [rti4empowerment] Wake up call
To: rti4empowerment <at> yahoogroups.com, "Sidharth Misra" <sidharthbbsr <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, May 30, 2010, 11:05 PM

 

We make so much of noise, express dissatisfaction,enter into debates, blame game and waste millions of man hours to chase the mirage called RTI
under certain acts said to be existing. By the very system democracy it is IMPLIED, as far as I can understand,  that information(other than what are restrained/prohibited) should be available just for the asking. If the government tries to put spoke in its free dispensing or make getting information a herckulian task, there exists no democracy in our country,
I am afraid!! 

Iyer GA

--- On Sun, 30/5/10, Sidharth Misra <sidharthbbsr <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Sidharth Misra <sidharthbbsr <at> gmail.com>
> Subject: [rti4empowerment] Wake up call
> To: rti4empowerment <at> yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, 30 May, 2010, 11:58 AM
> Wake up call
> by Dilip Cherian, Asian Age
>
>
> PRIME MINISTER Manmohan Singh is still chipping away at
> Right to
> Information (RTI) they hint, but the Central Information
> Commission
> continues to bat for transparency despite the many
> obstacles it has
> faced since its inception.
>
> Concerned over increased reports of delays in redressal of
> public
> grievances, the commission has now directed the government
> to notify
> guidelines on the timeframe for redressing complaints.
> Incidentally,
> all this has nothing to do with the bogey of judicial
> objections that
> Dr Singh is blaming for wanting RTI amended.
>
> The directive issued by information commissioner Shailesh
> Gandhi in
> Delhi recently is being seen by RTI activists as yet
> another rap on
> the knuckles to the government for failing to respond in a
> timely
> manner. In some states, sources say, the guidelines have
> been duly
> framed but never implemented. In the case that came up
> before Mr
> Gandhi, the information commissioner learned that though
> the
> guidelines issued by the department of administrative
> reforms and
> public grievances has stipulated a timeframe for the
> authorities to
> respond, it is rarely enforced.
>
> Mr Gandhi’s order now implies that babus who flout these
> guidelines
> may have to face administrative action for the delay. But
> will errant
> babus change their ways? Your guess is as good as mine.
>
> Powered by pressmart Media Ltd
>    
> source : http://epaper.asianage.com/ASIAN/AAGE/2010/05/30/ArticleHtmls/30_05_2010_007_007.shtml?Mode=1
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>     rti4empowerment-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com
>
>
>





__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
    .

    __,_._,___
    urvashi sharma | 1 Jun 2010 07:03
    Picon

    Re: Re: Free Books on-“Judgments on Right to Information ,for Non Funded Groups [2 Attachments]

     
    [Attachment(s) from urvashi sharma included below]

    res. sir ,

    please find enclosed the scanned copy of the cash deposit receipt.

    urvashi

    On 5/31/10, shanti ranjan behera <shanti_ranjan-QOiod4cnrWAN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> wrote:
    > Thanks for the e-mail.
    > I was not aware that you had deposited the money.Will you please send us a
    > scanned copy of the transfer details for our accounting purposes?.Needless
    > to mention that we are under scanner,Govt wants to know the source of
    > funding.Hope you understand it.As soon as we receive the transaction details
    > we will send you the Books + we will also send you the consignment Number.
    > Looking forward for a quick response.
    > Thanks and Regards.
    > sincerely,
    > Shanti Ranjan
    >
    > On Mon, 31 May 2010 22:36:59 +0530 wrote
    >>dear shanti ranjan ji
    >
    >
    >
    > i have deposited the desired one hundred rupees as per ur a/c details
    >
    > from IOB rajajipuram ,lucknow ,uttar pradesh Branch. Please send
    >
    > books on rti at given address
    >
    >
    >
    > urvashi sharma
    >
    > F - 2376 ,rajajipuram
    >
    > Lucknow 226017 ,U. P.
    >
    > m-9369613513
    >
    > 8081898081
    >
    >
    >
    > please acknowledge the receipt of postal charges n send the books.
    >
    >
    >
    > its a long back i met u . i am inviting you to an international
    >
    > convention of rti activists to be held in lucknow on 28th September
    >
    > 2010. i am co-ordinator of the convention .
    >
    >
    >
    > regards
    >
    >
    >
    > urvashi
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On 5/24/10, shanti ranjan behera wrote:
    >
    >>
    >
    >> Monday, May 24, 2010
    >
    >>
    >
    >> To
    >
    >> Urvashi sharma
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    >
    > Urvashi Sharma
    >
    > http://yaishwaryaj.hpage.com
    >
    >

    --
    Urvashi Sharma
    http://yaishwaryaj.hpage.com

    __._,_.___

    Attachment(s) from urvashi sharma

    2 of 2 Photo(s)

    Recent Activity:
      .

      __,_._,___
      Amitabh Thakur | 1 Jun 2010 16:48
      Picon
      Favicon

      Train rain

       

      Friends,

      It is for these reasons that I always avoid going to the train reservation center. For certain reasons, I have always had a mild or strong altercation with the officer on the other side of the glass pane. I know there are some latent volatile qualities in me but interestingly, these people have the potential and ability to bring the best out of it. . This time it happened at counter No 324 of Gomti Nagar railway station in Lucknow. The date was today, i.e. 01/06/2010, time 2PM to 2.02PM. The purpose of visit- to get the ticket No 263-5180396 for Shramjeevi Express from Lucknow to Patna for my wife Nutan for the date 30/05/2010 cancelled. My wife had got her travel cancelled at the last minute and hence the need for cancelling the ticket had arisen. I had been avoiding going to get the ticket cancelled for the last two days. It was a IInd sleeper ticket costing Rs. 247 and hence all I expected was a return of nearly Rs. 120. But the pain and trouble of doing it seemed much more to me and hence the avoidance. Today when I was coming back to my house through the railway station, I suddenly thought I might as well get the ticket cancelled. I went to the station, filled the form and stood in the line. The moment I was there, I heard the announce cement from the official from the counter that since it was 2PM hence there would be a fifteen minute break. I thought that I might use the opportunity to get a few points clarified because it was the case of a ticket being cancelled whose date had already passed. I would try to present the conversation I had with the Booking clerk as near to the real act as it transpired there on the counter (just the way they show it on the TV news or in the cricket TV replay).
      Me- “Sir, Wanted to ask you a question”
      The Official- “Yes”
      Me- “Can this ticket be cancelled now” (Hand him over the ticket)
      Official- “No”
      Me- “But why”
      Official (bluntly)- “Because You (“tum” in Hindi) have already travelled on this ticket”
      Me- “If this is the case, it will be shown in the computer. But the ticket has not been used.”
      Official (even more bluntly)- “You have used the ticket. You are lying.” (and smiles broadly in a winning gesture)
      Me- “But what is my use of speaking a lie.”
      Official (giving a final verdict)- “No, I know u (tum) have used it and have come here with a false case.” (laughs more gregariously and contemptuously)
      Me (now having started losing my temper)- “Why don’t you use proper language.”
      This soon degenerates into a tirade of sorts and a volley of heated arguments are exchanged. It ends with the official threatening me with dire physical consequences and orders me to get away from there for my own well-being.
      Now we come to Scene II of the episode.  I get shifted from the place but not very far away. I take out the diary from where I dial a few numbers to finally get the phone No of the Divisional Railway Manager (DRM) of the NE Railway under whose jurisdiction this official comes. I talk to the DRM on the phone and make a verbal complaint. He listens patiently and says that he would take appropriate action. By now the news of this event has spread around. The in-charge of the booking department and the concerned official are filling jittery. One of them comes to me and starts talking in a very kind tone to come inside and get the matter sorted. This time I flatly refuse. A few people from the public, including some of those who had similar bad experience with the official, start answering on my behalf. they are feeling emboldened and revenged. They ask me to write down a complaint against the official which I readily comply with. At least five of these persons also sign on the complaint. The booking staff, all the time, is trying to make peace, now that the table seemed to have turned.
      Finally I came out of the railway station and went to the DRM office and met him personally. He directed me to meet one of his junior officers who deals with these matters. I have handed over the complaint to this lady officer and am eagerly waiting for the subsequent action.
      In sum, it had been an eventful day, courtesy this Railway official. I am sure, all of you who had an opportunity and good luck to deal with government officials, might be having an experience or two to share on these lines.

      Amitabh Thakur,
      Currently at IIM Lucknow,
      # 94155-34526

      __._,_.___
      Recent Activity:
        .

        __,_._,___
        urvashi sharma | 2 Jun 2010 05:10
        Picon

        Fwd: [HumJanenge] Another RTI activist killed in Maharashtra

         

        respected all ,

        please go thru the forwarded mail .

        The atrocities on RTI activists and RTI users are increasing
        exponentially with each passing day , Many of them resulting in their
        murders . Each murder is Death of honesty , death of transparency and
        death blow to the RTI act .

        Pendency in info-commissions is providing a good shelter to the
        corrupts and long pendencies with non-compliance of penal clause of
        rti act ( in letter n spirit ) by almost all info-commissioners is
        the real cause of all these murders because once one files rti to
        expose corruption , he buys enmity with the corrupts. If the case is
        drawn very long , the corrupt gets the time to mastermind the evil
        plans resulting in murders.

        Simple exchanges of e-mails is no solution to this problem so I
        request all rti activists across the globe to call a meeting at any
        place and chalk out a concrete plan to safeguard the interests of rti
        activists / rti users. May be we should plan a dharna in delhi on
        international right to know day , 28th September 2010 and a meeting
        with PM & Sonia Gandhi focused on this issue only.

        best regards

        urvashi sharma

        ---------- Forwarded message ----------
        From: vishalkudchadkar <v_kudz-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
        Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:59:28 -0000
        Subject: [HumJanenge] Another RTI activist killed in Maharashtra
        To: HumJanenge-hHKSG33TihhqA26CCmlJIf8+0UxHXcjY@public.gmane.org

        http://ibnlive.in.com/news/another-rti-activist-killed-in-maharashtra/116770-3.html?from=justinhome

        Another Right to Information (RTI) activist has been murdered in
        Maharashtra. Datta Patil, an activist from Ichalkaranji in the
        Kolhapur district, was found dead on May 22. This is the latest among
        the increasing number of attacks against activists in Maharashtra.
        Less than 6 months ago, RTI activist Satish Shetty, had been killed in
        Talegaon near Pune.

        Patil who was well known in his hometown Ichalkaranji in the Kolhapur
        district for taking on administrators via the RTI act was attacked
        with a sword.

        Friend and activist Appa Patil said, "He was involved in a lot of
        social causes. He exposed corruption amongst several politicians and
        bureaucrats."

        Patil had made several enemies due to his activism.

        Patil had petitioned the local court against horse trading during
        municipal council elections. He had also demanded an inquiry into the
        assets of 2 former police inspectors. He had lodged several complaints
        against construction by a prominent builder.

        Assistant Police Inspector, Ichalkaranji, Anil Vibhute said, "We are
        yet to make some arrests in this case... once we do that we can zero
        in on who the main perpetrator is."

        Six persons have now been arrested for Patil's murder but many insist
        they are not the main perpetrators.

        --
        Urvashi Sharma
        http://yaishwaryaj.hpage.com

        __._,_.___
        Recent Activity:
          .

          __,_._,___
          Anil kumar | 2 Jun 2010 06:54
          Picon
          Favicon

          Where are the sponsors?

           

          Where are the sponsors?

          CWG OC Struggling To Raise Rs 1,600 Crore To Repay Loan

          TIMES NEWS NETWORK
          http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Daily/skins/TOINEW/navigator.asp?Daily=TOIBG&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI



          New Delhi: Will the 2010 Commonwealth Games’ Organising Committee (OC) be able to repay Rs 1,600 crore it has taken as loan from the Centre to host the mega event? OC’s reply to an RTI filed to find out the amount of money so far raised from the sponsorship of the Games, paints a grim picture.
             

          With just four months to go for the Games, the OC has been able to raise just Rs 243 crore through sponsorship deals. Sponsorships, apart from television rights, are expected to form the major chunk of money for the organisers, who are also expecting to raise some money through merchandising and ticket sales.
             

          According to OC’s reply to the RTI on May 11, it has on board only five sponsors — Air India, NTPC, Hero Honda, Central Bank of India and Coca Cola — for the Games so far. It has raised Rs 143 crores in cash from the sponsors and got Rs 60.70 crore in kind. Another Rs 100 crore has been promised by the Indian Railways.
             

          OC has roped in Australian firm Sport Marketing and Management Private Limited (SMAM) as its advertisement consultant, in charge of bringing in sponsors for the event. SMAM was a consultant at the 2002 Manchester Games and 2006 Melbourne Games too. The firm is working on a commission basis and it’s commission, according to OC chairman Suresh Kalmadi, varies from 20 to 25 per cent of the deal amount.
             

          “They had asked for commission touching 30 per cent, but after negotiations it was worked out between 20 to 25 per cent, depending on the amount they bring in,” Kalmadi had told ToI recently.
             

          Kalmadi has admitted that both Melbourne and Manchester Games did not get many multinational sponsors, an indication that the OC may also lose out on that front. This means that it would be even more difficult for OC to raise money to repay the government loan. When asked whether SMAM has been able to rope in any local sponsors, Kalmadi said: “All, except the Railways.” This means that 25 per cent of Rs 143 crore so far raised will go to SMAM, leaving OC with only Rs 107.25 crore.
             

          TV rights deals, the next big hope of fund generation, have more or less been sealed. Deals with the likes of BBC in United Kingdom, Network Ten and Foxtel in Australia, South African Broadcasting Corporation, TV New Zealand, Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation, Seychelles Broadcasting Corporation, ABU in Malaysia, Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria, Namibia Broadcasting Corporation and others are believed to have generated close to Rs 300 crore.
             

          Merchandising and tickets sales are unlikely to generate a huge amount of money, which could leave OC in heavy debt after the Gamnes are over.
            
           “We are hopeful of getting a lot of money. We hope to cover the deficit,” was Kalmadi’s answer.


          __._,_.___
          Recent Activity:
            .

            __,_._,___
            Ananya Dasgupta, EQUATIONS | 2 Jun 2010 08:30

            Where are the sponsors for CWG?

             

            Dear friends

             

            EQUATIONS, a non-profit organisation looking into the impacts of tourism since 1985, is researching the links between the CWG and Tourism - and the supposed benefits of the CWG games. Based on the Halifax Commonwealth Games data in addition to that of Melbourne and Manchester Games, our research so far has also shown that revenues earned from the games will never cover costs, and there are no profits to be made. It would therefore be rare for a mega event to be sponsored privately), which means that it is the public sector that has to step up each time, risking the tax-payer’s money.

             

            It is indeed very interesting to know that RTI application has also points out similar facts- the OC is talking about the same. Does anyone know who had filed this RTI? We would be very interested to have a discussion with the respective member of the civil society.  

            Regards

            Ananya

            EQUAIONS (www.equitabletourism.org)

             

            From: antibriberycampaign <at> yahoogroups.com [mailto:antibriberycampaign <at> yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anil kumar
            Sent: Wednesday, 2 June, 2010 10:25 AM
            To: KRIA 2000; PRAJA-VOL
            Cc: rti4ngo; RTI4EMPOWERMENT; antibriberycampaign; NATIONAL RTI FORUM
            Subject: [AntiBriberyCampaign] Where are the sponsors?

             




            Where are the sponsors?

            CWG OC Struggling To Raise Rs 1,600 Crore To Repay Loan

            TIMES NEWS NETWORK
            http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Daily/skins/TOINEW/navigator.asp?Daily=TOIBG&showST=true&login=default&pub=TOI



            New Delhi: Will the 2010 Commonwealth Games’ Organising Committee (OC) be able to repay Rs 1,600 crore it has taken as loan from the Centre to host the mega event? OC’s reply to an RTI filed to find out the amount of money so far raised from the sponsorship of the Games, paints a grim picture.
               

            With just four months to go for the Games, the OC has been able to raise just Rs 243 crore through sponsorship deals. Sponsorships, apart from television rights, are expected to form the major chunk of money for the organisers, who are also expecting to raise some money through merchandising and ticket sales.
               

            According to OC’s reply to the RTI on May 11, it has on board only five sponsors — Air India, NTPC, Hero Honda, Central Bank of India and Coca Cola — for the Games so far. It has raised Rs 143 crores in cash from the sponsors and got Rs 60.70 crore in kind. Another Rs 100 crore has been promised by the Indian Railways.
               

            OC has roped in Australian firm Sport Marketing and Management Private Limited (SMAM) as its advertisement consultant, in charge of bringing in sponsors for the event. SMAM was a consultant at the 2002 Manchester Games and 2006 Melbourne Games too. The firm is working on a commission basis and it’s commission, according to OC chairman Suresh Kalmadi, varies from 20 to 25 per cent of the deal amount.
               

            “They had asked for commission touching 30 per cent, but after negotiations it was worked out between 20 to 25 per cent, depending on the amount they bring in,” Kalmadi had told ToI recently.
               

            Kalmadi has admitted that both Melbourne and Manchester Games did not get many multinational sponsors, an indication that the OC may also lose out on that front. This means that it would be even more difficult for OC to raise money to repay the government loan. When asked whether SMAM has been able to rope in any local sponsors, Kalmadi said: “All, except the Railways.” This means that 25 per cent of Rs 143 crore so far raised will go to SMAM, leaving OC with only Rs 107.25 crore.
               

            TV rights deals, the next big hope of fund generation, have more or less been sealed. Deals with the likes of BBC in United Kingdom, Network Ten and Foxtel in Australia, South African Broadcasting Corporation, TV New Zealand, Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation, Seychelles Broadcasting Corporation, ABU in Malaysia, Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria, Namibia Broadcasting Corporation and others are believed to have generated close to Rs 300 crore.
               

            Merchandising and tickets sales are unlikely to generate a huge amount of money, which could leave OC in heavy debt after the Gamnes are over.
              

             “We are hopeful of getting a lot of money. We hope to cover the deficit,” was Kalmadi’s answer.



            __._,_.___
            Recent Activity:
              .

              __,_._,___
              Anil kumar | 2 Jun 2010 19:19
              Picon
              Favicon

              Fw: RE: [kria] Where are the sponsors for CWG?

               



              --- On Wed, 6/2/10, Ananya Dasgupta, EQUATIONS <ananya.d <at> equitabletourism.org> wrote:

              From: Ananya Dasgupta, EQUATIONS <ananya.d <at> equitabletourism.org>
              Subject: RE: [kria] Where are the sponsors for CWG?
              To: kria <at> yahoogroups.com
              Cc: "EQUATIONS Ananya" <ananya.d <at> equitabletourism.org>
              Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 3:40 PM

               
              Thanks a lot Anilji. This is of much help.
              Regards
              Ananya

              -----Original Message-----
              From: kria <at> yahoogroups.com [mailto:kria <at> yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anil
              kumar
              Sent: Wednesday, 2 June, 2010 2:50 PM
              To: kria <at> yahoogroups.com
              Subject: Re: [kria] Where are the sponsors for CWG?

              D ear Ananya,
              RTI might have filed by TOI,Delhi, you may approach the TOI for further
              details.
              With regards,
              anil

              --- On Wed, 6/2/10, Ananya Dasgupta, EQUATIONS
              <ananya.d <at> equitabletourism.org> wrote:

              [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

              ------------------------------------

              Yahoo! Groups Links


              __._,_.___
              Recent Activity:
                .

                __,_._,___
                Vinita Vishwas Deshmukh | 3 Jun 2010 00:40
                Picon

                Janwani's take on Pune's metro DPR

                 

                Following is the press release issued by Janwani, the NGO outfit of the MCCIA,
                 

                We at Janwani fully support the concept of a mass transit system like the Metro as a key element to meet Pune’s future mobility needs.  However the current Metro proposal that the PMC is planning to send to the GoM and GoI has several major gaps that should be addressed before moving ahead with this vital project. 
                 

                1. We believe that the Metro should be made underground in the older and more developed parts of the city since this will provide more flexibility, better connectivity to other modal nodes, and minimize disruption during construction.   This requires doing a comparative analysis of the current largely elevated option to a part underground and part elevated option and assessing these two options in terms of financial and economic costs and returns. 
                 
                1. The DPR should show how the Metro will integrate with other public transport modes like bus, BRTS and rail and how it fits with the Comprehensive Mobility Plan for Pune.  The current DPR does not address this and looks at Metro as a standalone solution with potential overlap with BRTS on several routes.
                 
                1. The city’s share of funding this project is mainly through proceeds from increased FSI.   However there is no comparison or FSI based financing to other financing options (e.g. raise property taxes, raise development charges, etc) to justify why this is the best option for the city to raise the required funds.   Furthermore if additional FSI is required to fund the Metro, then the amount and location of the additional FSI should be determined in a more scientific manner than what is in the DMRC report (FSI of 4 to be allowed 500 meters on each side of the Metro line)
                 
                1. While most cities both in India and abroad have opted for Standard Gauge, there are persuasive reasons to look at Broad Gauge as an alternative that has more carrying capacity and lower unit costs.   Without a side by side analysis of these two , going with Standard Gauge seems questionable and possibly short sighted.
                 
                 

                If the current submission to the GoM is not intended as a DPR but only as a broad outline of the Metro project so as to get in-principle approval and funding commitments from the GoM and GoI, then presumably the above suggestions can be incorporated as the DPR is being prepared, although they could end up changing the current proposal considerably.     There also needs to be more extensive public consultations during the preparation of the DPR so that the issues and options can be thoroughly discussed and reviewed prior to finalization of the DPR.                                               

                If however, the PMC is submitting the DMRC proposal as a DPR, then we have grave reservations about the PMC’s ability to modify the proposal after GoM and GoI approval to accommodate the suggestions listed above since these could change the routes, cost, funding, and returns associated with the project.   Furthermore, if the DMRC project report is being submitted as a DPR, please note that it fails to meet the guidelines laid down by MoUD as to what should be contained in any mass transit related DPR.    

                We understand that incorporating the above suggestions will take a few months, but this is a small delay in a project that will affect Pune for many decades to come.  

                Sincerely 
                  Vishal Jain
                Advisor, Janwani
                MCCIA








                __._,_.___
                Recent Activity:
                  .

                  __,_._,___
                  Avinash Murkute | 3 Jun 2010 10:08
                  Picon

                  CBI arrest BSNL DGM

                   

                  Muzaffarpur (Bihar), Jun 2 (PTI) The CBI today arrested a a senior BSNL officer from Muzaffarpur for allegedly taking a bribe from a contractor for awarding him a contract for laying cable wires in the area, officials said.

                  Acting on the complaint of contractor Manoj Kumar, a CBI team laid a trap and caught BSNL Muzaffarpur Circle DGM Kaushal Kumar red handed in his office while he was accepting a bribe of Rs 5000 from the man.

                  The DGM was being interrogated and his office and residence were being searched by the CBI, the officials said.
                   
                  Note:
                   
                  Be it known to BSNL CMD - Kuldeep Goyal that he is actually sitting on similar complaint made to him and received by him about Multicolor Digital Corruption in BSNL Nagpur. Congrats CBI for above arrest.
                  __._,_.___
                  Recent Activity:
                    .

                    __,_._,___
                    Vinita Vishwas Deshmukh | 4 Jun 2010 02:02
                    Picon

                    URGENT & IMPORTANT - Aruna Roy addresses Press Conf. on Pune Metro.

                     

                    for info



                    PUNE METRO JAGRUTI ABHIYAN (PMJA)

                    with

                     

                    PUNE TECHNICAL COALITION (PTC)

                    &

                     JANWANI

                     

                    Is organizing a

                     

                    Press Conference

                     

                    by renowned Social Activist, Magsaysay Awardee and

                    Member, National Advisory Council

                     

                    Ms. ARUNA ROY

                     

                    Topic:

                     

                    “PUNE METRO PROPOSAL – Need for Public Consultation and Independent Review of Detailed Project Report (DPR) before passing the proposal”

                     

                    On

                     

                    Friday, 4th June, 6.30pm

                     

                    At

                     

                    Bajaj Conference Room, MCCIA, 5th Floor, ICC Centre

                    SB Road, Pune

                     

                     

                    Warm regards:

                     

                    . Girish Deshpande, Co-Convenor PMJA

                     Shirish Kembhavi, convener, PTC

                    Kishori Gadre, Director, Janwani

                     


                    __._,_.___
                    Recent Activity:
                      .

                      __,_._,___

                      Gmane