1 Nov 2004 20:00
cars nonconvivial?
--- In CarFree@..., De Clarke <de <at> u...> wrote: > in an earlier post Serge challenge the idea that the automobile was a > nonconvivial (non-vulgarisable, diminishing-returns) technology, and suggested > that it is streets and parking lots that are the nonconvivial technology. > I didn't have time or energy to respond at the time, but this strikes me as > absurd. the car, the road (as we now know it) and the parking lot, are all > part of *one* technology: the private automobile paradigm. take away the > cars and the infrastructure would be radically different. it's all one > package, and the demand for parking and roadway space that the private auto > generates is part of what makes it nonconvivial: if you get enough people > in cars demanding to occupy large amounts of space (in motion or at rest), > you start to run out of space, both for more-people-in-cars and for everyone > not-in-cars. Yes, it is true that cars and the facilities for them (roads, parking lots) can be viewed as one technology, but they are not one and the same. Consider if movie theaters were made "public" (like our roads) and(Continue reading)
RSS Feed