headers
Brian Rice | 1 Mar 2006 02:37
Favicon

Re: TUNES wiki license.

That's my conclusion as well. Faré, any input?

On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:15 PM, Massimo Dentico wrote:

> Hi,
>
> someone is asking on our wiki:
>
>   http://tunes.org/wiki/Talk:Freedows
>
>   License?
>
>   What is the license for the stuff in this
>   wiki? The info in the freedows article would
>   help wikipedia's article.
>
> I replied:
>
>   I think it is safe to consider this wiki uder
>   the **bugroff license**, which is the license
>   for Tunes FAQ and Tunes documentation in general.
>   Anyway, I will ask on Tunes general mailing list.
>
> Is my information correct?

--
-Brian
http://tunes.org/~water/brice.vcf
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Faré | 1 Mar 2006 02:51
Picon
Gravatar

Re: TUNES wiki license.

Yes. bugroff is what applies to the Tunes Wiki. If anyone objects or
isn't satisfied, he may speak up (and probably be ignored).

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized.
In the first, it is ridiculed.
In the second, it is opposed.
In the third, it is regarded as self-evident.
        -- Arthur Schopenhauer, 19th century German philosopher

On 28/02/06, Brian Rice <water <at> tunes.org> wrote:
> That's my conclusion as well. Faré, any input?
>
> On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:15 PM, Massimo Dentico wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > someone is asking on our wiki:
> >
> >   http://tunes.org/wiki/Talk:Freedows
> >
> >   License?
> >
> >   What is the license for the stuff in this
> >   wiki? The info in the freedows article would
> >   help wikipedia's article.
> >
> > I replied:
> >
> >   I think it is safe to consider this wiki uder
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane