headers
Patch Nag | 1 Feb 03:35

New Solaris Patches available at riddleware.com 20070131

110911-06    SunOS 5.8_x86: /usr/lib/fs/ufs utilities patch
121007-02    SunOS 5.10_x86: libkadm5 and kadmind patch
124421-01    X11 6.4.1_x86: freetype2 patch
124919-02    SunOS 5.10_x86: devfsadm patch support
124992-01    SunOS 5.10_x86: llc2 driver patch
125034-01    SunOS 5.10_x86: pcicfg patch
125036-01    SunOS 5.10_x86: libinetsvc.so.1 patch

Please check the Links page before posting:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/links
Post message: solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com
UNSUBSCRIBE:  solarisx86-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:solarisx86-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:solarisx86-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Mike Riley | 1 Feb 06:55
Picon

Re: New Solaris Patches available at riddleware.com 20070131

Patch Nag wrote:
> 125034-01    SunOS 5.10_x86: pcicfg patch

This is the patch needed for IBM Blade Centers to boot properly.

Unfortunately it does have dependencies on 118855-36, which drags in other 
patches.  About 8 all told I believe.  The bits *really* only need what is in 
Solaris 10 Update 3 (118855-33).  So you can, in theory, patch your install 
media by simply copying these bits into your miniroot archive to get it 
installed.  But you will also have to patch it post install and that will 
require the rest of the patches be available to you.

We are trying to come up with a way to provide you patched media for such 
systems.  I don't know yet what form that will take.  Maybe a script that 
patches your install image for you, a patched install image available for 
download, or what.

Mike

Please check the Links page before posting:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/links
Post message: solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com
UNSUBSCRIBE:  solarisx86-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
palowoda | 1 Feb 13:05
Favicon

Re: New Solaris Patches available at riddleware.com 20070131

--- In solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com, Mike Riley <michael.riley@...> wrote:
>
> Patch Nag wrote:
> > 125034-01    SunOS 5.10_x86: pcicfg patch
> 
> This is the patch needed for IBM Blade Centers to boot properly.
> 
> Unfortunately it does have dependencies on 118855-36, which drags in
other 
> patches.  About 8 all told I believe.  The bits *really* only need
what is in 
> Solaris 10 Update 3 (118855-33).  So you can, in theory, patch your
install 
> media by simply copying these bits into your miniroot archive to get it 
> installed.  But you will also have to patch it post install and that
will 
> require the rest of the patches be available to you.
> 
> We are trying to come up with a way to provide you patched media for
such 
> systems.  I don't know yet what form that will take.  Maybe a script
that 
> patches your install image for you, a patched install image
available for 
> download, or what.
> 

  We even talked about this a year ago. :-)

---Bob
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
mpaul888 | 1 Feb 14:52
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: Patching U3?

--- In solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com, Mike Riley <michael.riley@...> wrote:
> 
> We found showrev coredump during s10u3 testing.  showrev was fixed
in s10u3.
> 
> This is the bugid:
> 
> 6489035 - showrev core on x86 systems installed with S10U3B9 or
s10u2 with 
> 118855-30.
> 
> There is a patch available to fix showrev:
> 
> 124630-03 - sparc
> 124631-03 - x86

The strange thing is that the OP (Chris Ridd) saw showrev -p
crashing after upgrading to s10u3. As 12463[01]-03 are pre-
installed with s10u3, one should assume that he already had
a fixed showrev command.

mp.

Please check the Links page before posting:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/links
Post message: solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com
UNSUBSCRIBE:  solarisx86-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 13 comments |
headers
Chris Ridd | 1 Feb 16:12
Favicon

Re: Re: Patching U3?

On 1/2/07 1:52, "mpaul888" <martin <at> par.univie.ac.at> wrote:

> --- In solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com, Mike Riley <michael.riley@...> wrote:
>> 
>> We found showrev coredump during s10u3 testing.  showrev was fixed
> in s10u3.
>> 
>> This is the bugid:
>> 
>> 6489035 - showrev core on x86 systems installed with S10U3B9 or
> s10u2 with 
>> 118855-30.
>> 
>> There is a patch available to fix showrev:
>> 
>> 124630-03 - sparc
>> 124631-03 - x86
> 
> The strange thing is that the OP (Chris Ridd) saw showrev -p
> crashing after upgrading to s10u3. As 12463[01]-03 are pre-
> installed with s10u3, one should assume that he already had
> a fixed showrev command.

I was going to wait until the patch appeared before I commented, but I have
to say I was confused by Mike's forwarded message too.

My machine (originally U1, upgraded to U2, then upgraded to U3) does not
have patch 124631 installed on it. At least, there's no directory with that
name under /var/sadm/patch, and the showrev command merrily dumps core when
I run it.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 12 comments |
headers
Mike Riley | 1 Feb 17:24
Picon

Re: Re: Patching U3?

Chris Ridd wrote:
> On 1/2/07 1:52, "mpaul888" <martin <at> par.univie.ac.at> wrote:
> 
>> --- In solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com, Mike Riley <michael.riley@...> wrote:
>>> We found showrev coredump during s10u3 testing.  showrev was fixed
>> in s10u3.
>>> This is the bugid:
>>>
>>> 6489035 - showrev core on x86 systems installed with S10U3B9 or
>> s10u2 with 
>>> 118855-30.
>>>
>>> There is a patch available to fix showrev:
>>>
>>> 124630-03 - sparc
>>> 124631-03 - x86
>> The strange thing is that the OP (Chris Ridd) saw showrev -p
>> crashing after upgrading to s10u3. As 12463[01]-03 are pre-
>> installed with s10u3, one should assume that he already had
>> a fixed showrev command.
> 
> I was going to wait until the patch appeared before I commented, but I have
> to say I was confused by Mike's forwarded message too.
> 
> My machine (originally U1, upgraded to U2, then upgraded to U3) does not
> have patch 124631 installed on it. At least, there's no directory with that
> name under /var/sadm/patch, and the showrev command merrily dumps core when
> I run it.
> 
> "uname -v" reports "Generic_118855-36".
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 9 comments |
headers
Phil Savoie | 1 Feb 17:35
Favicon

Error on Boot

Hi All,

Received the following error on boot:

Warning: tzmon: error evaluating _AL object

The error appear after a 45 second delay after the copyright screen came on.  
My questions are:

What is this?

Do I need to be concerned about it?

I am running the current nevada release of opensolaris on a Compaq Pressario 
R3000 AMD 64 notebook.

3rd question:  I have been looking but am not successful so far, is there a 
wireless driver available for this notebook?  It is a broadcom 43xx.

Thank you in advance,

Phil

Please check the Links page before posting:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/links
Post message: solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com
UNSUBSCRIBE:  solarisx86-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Chris Ridd | 1 Feb 17:50
Favicon

Re: Re: Patching U3?

On 1/2/07 4:24, "Mike Riley" <michael.riley <at> sun.com> wrote:

> Can you try applying the patch and see if it fixes the problem?

From the distribution DVD? I can try that when I'm back in the office
tomorrow. I tried getting the patch using pca but that just fails due to
"missing patch file".

> If you are still getting cores then please provide a stack trace so we can see
> if you are getting a different issue.  Not that I have a stack trace of the
> problem myself, but I am sure those that were looking at it do.

Right now, I get the following stack trace:

# showrev -p
Segmentation Fault - core dumped
# ls -l core*
-rw-------   1 root     root     3359554 Feb  1 16:36 core
# pstack core
core 'core' of 1545:    showrev -p
 080548c8 list_patches (0, 1, 0, 0, 2, 8047e34) + 716
 08054b94 do_patch (8047e9c, 8047e1c, feffa840, 0, 0, 0) + 142
 08054e21 main     (2, 8047e60, 8047e6c) + 16f
 08051cda ???????? (2, 8047f04, 8047f0c, 0, 8047f0f, 8047f16)

A truss ends in:
open("/var/sadm/pkg/SUNWcsr/pkginfo", O_RDONLY) = 4
fstat64(4, 0x0803D020)                          = 0
brk(0x0806CE60)                                 = 0
brk(0x0806EE60)                                 = 0
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 8 comments |
headers
John D Groenveld | 1 Feb 18:09
Picon

Re: Re: Patching U3?

In message <C1E7CAE1.26292%chris.ridd <at> isode.com>, Chris Ridd writes:
>From the distribution DVD? I can try that when I'm back in the office
>tomorrow. I tried getting the patch using pca but that just fails due to
>"missing patch file".

<URL:http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-124631-03-1>

># showrev -p
>Segmentation Fault - core dumped
># ls -l core*
>-rw-------   1 root     root     3359554 Feb  1 16:36 core
># pstack core
>core 'core' of 1545:    showrev -p
> 080548c8 list_patches (0, 1, 0, 0, 2, 8047e34) + 716
> 08054b94 do_patch (8047e9c, 8047e1c, feffa840, 0, 0, 0) + 142
> 08054e21 main     (2, 8047e60, 8047e6c) + 16f
> 08051cda ???????? (2, 8047f04, 8047f0c, 0, 8047f0f, 8047f16)

That's where it was dropping core in BugID 6489035.

John
groenveld <at> acm.org

Please check the Links page before posting:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/solarisx86/links
Post message: solarisx86 <at> yahoogroups.com
UNSUBSCRIBE:  solarisx86-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 7 comments |
headers
Chris Ridd | 1 Feb 18:25
Favicon

Re: Re: Patching U3?

On 1/2/07 5:09, "John D Groenveld" <jdg117 <at> stevens.arl.psu.edu> wrote:

> In message <C1E7CAE1.26292%chris.ridd <at> isode.com>, Chris Ridd writes:
>> From the distribution DVD? I can try that when I'm back in the office
>> tomorrow. I tried getting the patch using pca but that just fails due to
>> "missing patch file".
> 
> <URL:http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-21-124631-03-1>

Thanks, but that patch isn't accessible unless you have a support contract
:-(

>> # showrev -p
>> Segmentation Fault - core dumped
>> # ls -l core*
>> -rw-------   1 root     root     3359554 Feb  1 16:36 core
>> # pstack core
>> core 'core' of 1545:    showrev -p
>> 080548c8 list_patches (0, 1, 0, 0, 2, 8047e34) + 716
>> 08054b94 do_patch (8047e9c, 8047e1c, feffa840, 0, 0, 0) + 142
>> 08054e21 main     (2, 8047e60, 8047e6c) + 16f
>> 08051cda ???????? (2, 8047f04, 8047f0c, 0, 8047f0f, 8047f16)
> 
> That's where it was dropping core in BugID 6489035.

Which is one of the bugs fixed in that patch according to the readme.

Cheers,

Chris
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 6 comments |

Gmane