headers
Xirui | 28 Jun 2005 09:10
Picon
Favicon

[osol-discuss] Re: Help: Schillix 0.1 booted without GUI

Thanks, I know Solaris Express. Actually, Solaris (and Solaris Express)  is free; opensolaris is free and
open source. 

I have another question here: what is the difference between "Solaris Express" and "Solaris Express:
Community Release"? Is there a GUI with "Solaris Express: Community Release"? Why does it need "Solaris
Express: Community Release" for opensolaris souce code?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Casper.Dik | 28 Jun 2005 10:08
Picon

Re: [osol-discuss] Security Community for OpenSolaris


>On Jun 24, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>
>> I'd like to create an OpenSolaris Security community.  I'm volunteering
>> to be the community leader.
>
>Although we don't have a process in place yet for approving these
>proposals, a safe bet would be that if you get at least three CAB
>members to give a +1 then the website group is authorized to go
>ahead and set it up.
>
>+1

+1

Casper

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Casper.Dik | 28 Jun 2005 10:27
Picon

Re: [osol-discuss] first kernel panic


>Jun 28 00:53:44 unknown genunix: [ID 403854 kern.notice] assertion failed: ibc < (void *)KERNELBAS
E, file: ../../common/os/mutex.c, line: 515

This appaers to be an error in the oss driver; they are passing the 
incorrect value as fourth argument to mutex_init().

Try setting "aok = 1" in the kernel (which causes the debug kernel
to ignore assertion failures) and then dtrace the call to mutex_init,
printing the fourth argumnt).

The fourth argument should be a small integer, as a result of code
similar to:

     ddi_get_iblock_cookie(dip, 0, &iblock);
     mutex_init(&un->un_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DRIVER,
                (void *)iblock);

However, sometimes the code is written like this:

     ddi_get_iblock_cookie(dip, 0, &iblock);
     mutex_init(&un->un_lock, NULL, MUTEX_DRIVER,
                (void *)&iblock);

which is incorrect and which is what the assertion tries to catch.

This shows that developing on non-debug kernels doesn't work quite
as well as developing on debug kernels.

I suggest reporting the bug.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Casper.Dik | 28 Jun 2005 10:41
Picon

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Help: Schillix 0.1 booted without GUI


>Thanks, I know Solaris Express. Actually, Solaris (and Solaris Express)  is free; opensolaris is f
ree and open source. 
>
>I have another question here: what is the difference between "Solaris Express" and "Solaris Expres
s: Community Release"? Is there a GUI with "Solaris Express: Community Release"? Why does it need "
Solaris Express: Community Release" for opensolaris souce code?

Solaris Express: more Q&A, older builds, once every month or so; only one 
out of every 2-4 builds.
Solaris Express: Community Edition: absolutely latest bits, all builds
made available, every other week.

Casper

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Cyril Plisko | 28 Jun 2005 11:05

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Help: Schillix 0.1 booted without GUI

On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:41, Casper.Dik <at> Sun.COM wrote:
> >Thanks, I know Solaris Express. Actually, Solaris (and Solaris Express)  is free; opensolaris is f
> ree and open source. 
> >
> >I have another question here: what is the difference between "Solaris Express" and "Solaris Expres
> s: Community Release"? Is there a GUI with "Solaris Express: Community Release"? Why does it need "
> Solaris Express: Community Release" for opensolaris souce code?
> 
> 
> Solaris Express: more Q&A, older builds, once every month or so; only one 
> out of every 2-4 builds.
> Solaris Express: Community Edition: absolutely latest bits, all builds
> made available, every other week.

If _all_ builds made available, where is build 17 I wonder :) ?

What is the canonical URL for getting Community Edition ?

Cyril

> 
> Casper
> 
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
> 
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Joerg Schilling | 28 Jun 2005 11:17
Picon
Favicon

Re: [osol-discuss] sar -d output

A K Saravanan <sarav_ak <at> yahoo.com> wrote:

> SunOS aks 5.11 schily17 i86pc    06/26/2005
>
> 04:20:01   device        %busy   avque   r+w/s  blks/s  avwait  avserv
>
> 04:20:02   cmdk0             0     0.0       0       0     0.0     0.0
>            fd0               0     0.0       0       0     0.0     0.0
>            nfs1              0     0.0       0       0     0.0     0.0
>            sd0               0     0.0       0       0     0.0     0.0
....
> sar -d output by default includes the devices which are not installed in the system for example fd0, I do not
have a floppy drive connected to the system.
>
> It will be more comfortable to have an output which lists only the attached devices.

Unfortunately it is hard to tell whether a floppy is connected to the 
controller. The fd controller is doubtlessly present...

Jörg

--

-- 
 EMail:joerg <at> schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js <at> cs.tu-berlin.de		(uni)  
       schilling <at> fokus.fraunhofer.de	(work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Joerg Schilling | 28 Jun 2005 11:57
Picon
Favicon

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Help: Schillix 0.1 booted without GUI

Shawn Walker <binarycrusader <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/25/05, Xirui <yangxirui <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
> > e.g.   gnome,  JDS
>
> To my knowledge, there is no GUI as of yet. JDS has not yet been
> released as part of the OpenSolaris project.
>
> You may be able to install pkg-get from blastwave.org:
>
> http://www.blastwave.org/pkg_get.pkg

pkg-get needs pkgadd which is not part of OpenSolaris.

Jörg

--

-- 
 EMail:joerg <at> schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js <at> cs.tu-berlin.de		(uni)  
       schilling <at> fokus.fraunhofer.de	(work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Joerg Schilling | 28 Jun 2005 12:05
Picon
Favicon

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Help: partitions on usb hard disk

Xirui <yangxirui <at> yahoo.com> wrote:

> fdisk says "cannot open device":
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> # rmformat
> Es wird nach Geräten gesucht...
>      1. Volmgt Node: /vol/dev/aliases/rmdisk0
>         Logical Node: /dev/rdsk/c2t0d0p0
>         Physical Node: /pci <at> 0,0/pci1734,1033 <at> 1d,7/storage <at> 2/disk <at> 0,0
>         Connected Device: FUJITSU  MHV2080AT        0811
>         Device Type: Removable
>         Bus: USB
>         Size: 76,3 GB
>         Label: <None>
>         Access permissions: Medium ist nicht schreibgeschützt.
> # fdisk /dev/rdsk/c2t0d0p0
> fdisk: Cannot open device /dev/rdsk/c2t0d0p0.

Try 'truss', fdisk is one of these unfriendly programs that 
does not give useful error messages.

Jörg

--

-- 
 EMail:joerg <at> schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js <at> cs.tu-berlin.de		(uni)  
       schilling <at> fokus.fraunhofer.de	(work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Joerg Schilling | 28 Jun 2005 12:33
Picon
Favicon

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Mascot

Jason Wohgemuth <stonent <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Sun Bear!

I don't like it.

try to find a mascott that does not have a specific name
in english only.....

Jörg

--

-- 
 EMail:joerg <at> schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js <at> cs.tu-berlin.de		(uni)  
       schilling <at> fokus.fraunhofer.de	(work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Joerg Schilling | 28 Jun 2005 12:37
Picon
Favicon

Re: [osol-discuss] schillix in a chroot

Sunil <funtoos <at> yahoo.com> wrote:

> is it possible to install schillix in a chroot env.? any pointers, how-tos?

SchilliX is a complete OS. 

If you install a _zone_, you could add the userland from SchilliX.

Jörg

--

-- 
 EMail:joerg <at> schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       js <at> cs.tu-berlin.de		(uni)  
       schilling <at> fokus.fraunhofer.de	(work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss <at> opensolaris.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane