Carsten Grzemba | 22 Apr 14:34 2015
Picon

apache24 prefork only

Hi Dago,

I think we should remove the
--with-mpm=prefork
configure option in apache24 because it prevents the build the shared mpm modules and builds only a static linked prefork server

Carsten

Riccardo Mottola | 21 Apr 08:54 2015

gs_terminal: error on sol11 upload

Hi,

I built gs_terminal (new name) and it pkg check is now fine.

While uploading, I get an error on solaris 11:

http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/f47caf0dc670ddd53fc49ddbd1b4067a/

Where is the problem? Aren't all the errors properly overridden?

Riccardo

Dagobert Michelsen | 20 Apr 15:22 2015

OpenSSL 1.0.1m considered harmful on Sparc

Hi folks,

I want to raise the issue about OpenSSL 1.0.1m again. On Sparc we have now
two serious issues:

- BIND fails with crypto failure
  https://www.opencsw.org/mantis/view.php?id=5237
- Solaris 9 applications have issues with hangs in unrelated code. This has been seen
  at least in GIT and Python

How do we proceed here? While I do notice that it would be good to provide a working 1.0.1m
the status quo is that bad that I would suggest rolling back to 1.0.1l at least on Sparc
if the issue can not be resolved in a reasonable timeframe.

Best regards

  — Dago

--

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

Attachment (smime.p7s): application/pkcs7-signature, 3266 bytes
Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński | 19 Apr 19:56 2015

Please test CSWisaexec

Hello maintainers,

isaexec is a small but important package responsible for executing
architecture specific variants of binaries on the filesystem. I looked
at the package we have now, and thought I'd do it in a simpler way.
The new package passed my first tests. It's such an important package,
that I'd like to hear from people who tested it before I push it into
unstable.

pkgutil -t http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/maciej -i isaexec

Maciej

Riccardo Mottola | 19 Apr 19:50 2015

checkpkg warnings II

Hi,

while doing a csw-upload (from login) I seem to get similar warnings 
than duing mgar on solaris 9:

WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,144 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,146 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,146 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,147 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,148 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,149 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,150 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,151 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,152 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,153 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,154 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,155 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,156 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
WARNING 2015-04-19 19:48:11,156 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWprojectcenter.
<...>

The uploads were marked as successful though.

Riccardo

Riccardo Mottola | 19 Apr 19:45 2015

updated binutils for solaris 9

Hi,

I attempted to build current binutils on solaris 9 sparc.

During build I get these Warnings:
WARNING 2015-04-19 14:32:11,270 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWgdb.
WARNING 2015-04-19 14:32:11,272 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWgnulinks.
WARNING 2015-04-19 14:32:11,273 checkpkg_lib.py:311 Not saving an error 
for CSWgnulinks.
the last being repeated many times.

Anyway, the final errors I get are:

CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/nm|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/size|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/strings|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/objcopy|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/ld|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/ar|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/addr2line|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/c++filt|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/strip|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/as|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/ranlib|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/readelf|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/objdump|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWbinutils += 
file-collision|/opt/csw/gnu/gprof|CSWbinutils|CSWgnulinks

What's the matter here? Why is everything fine on sol. 10?

Riccardo

Riccardo Mottola | 19 Apr 11:05 2015

libpng update 16

Hi,

I undeterook the effort to update libpng, I have not yet commited 
anything, I understand that it is delicate about so-names and other 
issues and I don't want to mess up since I am not the maintainer.
I want to have it working on solaris 9 & 10.

I have the patch pasted below, any comments? If you prefer, I can commit.
I essentially replaced 15 verywhere with 16, that should give a new soname

I think I get a reasonable result:

However I get this warning:
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibpng-dev += missing-dependency|CSWlibz1

http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/0bf6255600e4f6656533564e33a5b9a9/

I think the culprit is:

1 s none /opt/csw/lib/libpng.so=libpng16.so
1 s none /opt/csw/lib/libpng16.so=libpng16.so.16.16.0

is the second linkk correct? Or should it be in the

which makes no sense, a dev package should not depend on a library, at 
most it could depend on its -dev library, but I don't think that is the 
error message, right?

Riccardo

+++ Makefile    (working copy)
 <at>  <at>  -1,4 +1,4  <at>  <at> 
-# Copyright 2009 OpenCSW
+# Copyright 2009-2015 OpenCSW
  # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
  # $Id$
  #
 <at>  <at>  -10,7 +10,7  <at>  <at> 
  #   pentium_pro

  NAME = libpng
-VERSION = 1.5.13
+VERSION = 1.6.16
  GARTYPE = v2
  DESCRIPTION = The official library for Portable Network Graphics 
format (PNG)
  define BLURB
 <at>  <at>  -27,19 +27,26  <at>  <at> 
  EXTRA_BUILD_ISAS += sparcv8plus+vis2
  EXTRA_BUILD_ISAS += pentium_pro

+#where can we build?
+PACKAGING_PLATFORMS += solaris9-sparc
+PACKAGING_PLATFORMS += solaris9-i386
+PACKAGING_PLATFORMS += solaris10-sparc
+PACKAGING_PLATFORMS += solaris10-i386
+
+
  PACKAGES = CSWlibpng-dev
  SPKG_DESC_CSWlibpng-dev = $(DESCRIPTION), development files
-RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibpng-dev += CSWlibpng15-15
+RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibpng-dev += CSWlibpng16-16

-PACKAGES += CSWlibpng15-15
-CATALOGNAME_CSWlibpng15-15 = libpng15_15
-PKGFILES_CSWlibpng15-15 += $(call 
baseisadirs,$(libdir),libpng15\.so\.15(\.\d+)*)
-SPKG_DESC_CSWlibpng15-15 += $(DESCRIPTION), libpng15.so.15
-RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibpng += CSWlibpng15-15
-RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibpng15-15 += CSWlibz1
+PACKAGES += CSWlibpng16-16
+CATALOGNAME_CSWlibpng16-16 = libpng16_16
+PKGFILES_CSWlibpng16-16+= $(call 
baseisadirs,$(libdir),libpng16\.so\.16(\.\d+)*)
+SPKG_DESC_CSWlibpng16-16 += $(DESCRIPTION), libpng16.so.16
+RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibpng += CSWlibpng16-16
+RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWlibpng16-16 += CSWlibz1

  # The CSWpng package must also pull in libpng.so.3 and libpng12.so.0
-OBSOLETED_BY_CSWlibpng15-15 = CSWpng
+OBSOLETED_BY_CSWlibpng16-16 = CSWpng

Peter FELECAN | 18 Apr 22:38 2015

Re: incorrect warning during check and upload

"Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński" <maciej@...> writes:

> 2015-04-18 8:30 GMT-07:00 Peter FELECAN <pfelecan@...>:
>> WARNING 2015-04-18 17:25:34,256 checkpkg_lib.py:658 Did not find packages for '/opt/csw/bin/isaexec'
>
> To be fair, there isn't a package which would contain the
> /opt/csw/bin/isaxec file. Checkpkg has no way of knowing what happens
> in Turing Complete postinstall scripts.

Well, it's still fallacious as there is a package. Turing or not.
Given that it's a warning it's not bothering me but this way it's
complete and available for other wondering souls.
--

-- 
Peter

Dagobert Michelsen | 18 Apr 22:26 2015

Re: incorrect warning during check and upload

Hi Peter,

Am 18.04.2015 um 18:06 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej@...>:
> 2015-04-18 8:30 GMT-07:00 Peter FELECAN <pfelecan@...>:
>> WARNING 2015-04-18 17:25:34,256 checkpkg_lib.py:658 Did not find packages for '/opt/csw/bin/isaexec'
> 
> To be fair, there isn't a package which would contain the
> /opt/csw/bin/isaxec file. Checkpkg has no way of knowing what happens
> in Turing Complete postinstall scripts.

Indeed, the CSWisaexec package is a special package from Phil which takes /usr/lib/isaexec
and makes a copy of it dynamically during postinstall and then uses installf to register it.
Unfortunately that can’t really be tracked. The message is safe to ignore.

Best regards

  — Dago

--

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

Attachment (smime.p7s): application/pkcs7-signature, 3266 bytes
Peter FELECAN | 18 Apr 17:30 2015

incorrect warning during check and upload

This message appears when checking or uploading:

Checking 1 package against catalog unstable i386 SunOS5.10

WARNING 2015-04-18 17:25:34,256 checkpkg_lib.py:658 Did not find packages for '/opt/csw/bin/isaexec'
WARNING 2015-04-18 17:25:34,257 checkpkg_lib.py:658 Did not find packages for '/opt/csw/bin/isaexec'

However, it's fallacious as the incriminated binary has a package which
is in the catalog.

N.B. I don't know where to fill a bug report, consequently I'm doing it here.
--

-- 
Peter

Peter FELECAN | 18 Apr 09:37 2015

cannot check packages

Maybe a build stack issue ?

INFO 2015-04-17 21:45:25,928 package_stats.py:132 Juicing the svr4 package stream files...
  0% ETA:  --:--:-- |                                                         |
CRITICAL 2015-04-17 22:11:23,593 shell.py:55 
CRITICAL 2015-04-17 22:11:23,595 shell.py:56 INFO 2015-04-17 21:50:33,085 retry_decorator.py:35
Retry, exception: URL HEAD
'http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/releases/blob/pkgstats/0da78e09757e0d09d24954990b35f811/'
HTTP code: 500
INFO 2015-04-17 21:55:43,122 retry_decorator.py:35 Retry, exception: URL HEAD
'http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/releases/blob/pkgstats/0da78e09757e0d09d24954990b35f811/'
HTTP code: 500
INFO 2015-04-17 22:00:53,152 retry_decorator.py:35 Retry, exception: URL HEAD
'http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/releases/blob/pkgstats/0da78e09757e0d09d24954990b35f811/'
HTTP code: 500
INFO 2015-04-17 22:06:03,181 retry_decorator.py:35 Retry, exception: URL HEAD
'http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/releases/blob/pkgstats/0da78e09757e0d09d24954990b35f811/'
HTTP code: 500
INFO 2015-04-17 22:11:13,211 retry_decorator.py:35 Retry, exception: URL HEAD
'http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/releases/blob/pkgstats/0da78e09757e0d09d24954990b35f811/'
HTTP code: 500
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar/lib/python/collect_pkg_metadata.py", line
623, in <module>
    unpacked = unpacker.CollectStats(force_unpack=options.force_unpack)
  File "/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar/lib/python/collect_pkg_metadata.py", line
594, in CollectStats
    self.md5_sum):
  File "/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar/lib/python/retry_decorator.py", line 39, in fn
    raise last_exception
lib.python.rest.RestCommunicationError: URL HEAD
'http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/releases/blob/pkgstats/0da78e09757e0d09d24954990b35f811/'
HTTP code: 500

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar//bin/../lib/python/checkpkg2.py", line 268,
in <module>
    main()
  File "/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar//bin/../lib/python/checkpkg2.py", line 174,
in main
    md5_sums_from_files = collector.CollectStatsFromCatalogEntries(entries, False)
  File "/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar/lib/python/package_stats.py", line 158, in CollectStatsFromCatalogEntries
    stderr=stderr_file)
  File "/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar/lib/python/shell.py", line 60, in ShellCommand
    % (args, retcode, ' '.join(pipes.quote(x) for x in args)))
lib.python.shell.ShellError: Running
['/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar/lib/python/collect_pkg_metadata.py',
'--input',
'/home/pfelecan/staging/build-17.Apr.2015/gdb-7.9,REV=2015.04.17-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz']
has failed, error code: 1. To find out why the command failed, please run it in the foreground, like this:
/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar/lib/python/collect_pkg_metadata.py --input /home/pfelecan/staging/build-17.Apr.2015/gdb-7.9,REV=2015.04.17-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz
/home/pfelecan/opencsw/.buildsys/v2/gar/gar//gar.pkg.mk:1020: recipe for target 'pkgcheck' failed

--

-- 
Peter


Gmane