1 Apr 2005 02:26
1 Apr 2005 06:06
Re: silly suggestions
<lucio <at> proxima.alt.za>
2005-04-01 04:06:48 GMT
2005-04-01 04:06:48 GMT
> '#' at the start of a file name implies a device file, so it's a poor > choice to replace '_'. I believe that replica only renames an old > file to _file if it's in a known directory of executables (e.g., > /386/bin, /rc/bin, /acme), so the _file names shouldn't be a big > problem. As far as I know, no actual executable's name starts with > '_', so it's safe to remove /386/bin/_*, for example. If that is true, then one could easily duplicate the functionality in a script that tidies up after replica. Can anyone suggest such a script and will it be totally safe? ++L
1 Apr 2005 06:51
Mozilla port.
Christoph Lohmann <20h <at> r-36.net>
2005-04-01 04:51:34 GMT
2005-04-01 04:51:34 GMT
Good morning. Finally, after months of work, it is done; a port of Mozilla: http://www.r-36.net/mozilla.tgz Some notes to the port: * All unneeded features are left out. Sincerly, Christoph
1 Apr 2005 07:25
Re: Mozilla port.
Kenji Okamoto <okamoto <at> granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
2005-04-01 05:25:18 GMT
2005-04-01 05:25:18 GMT
> Finally, after months of work, it is done; a port of Mozilla: > http://www.r-36.net/mozilla.tgz April Fool? Kenji
1 Apr 2005 07:36
Re: Mozilla port.
andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov <at> cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
2005-04-01 05:36:10 GMT
2005-04-01 05:36:10 GMT
>> Finally, after months of work, it is done; a port of Mozilla: >> http://www.r-36.net/mozilla.tgz > > April Fool? > > Kenji my bet was either an MS Windows emulation layer (done by MS themselves) or the triumphant return of Ken Thompson as our benevolent dictator.
1 Apr 2005 08:40
Re: Mozilla port.
David Tolpin <dvd <at> davidashen.net>
2005-04-01 06:40:32 GMT
2005-04-01 06:40:32 GMT
On 01.04.2005, at 9:51, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > Good morning. > > Finally, after months of work, it is done; a port of Mozilla: > http://www.r-36.net/mozilla.tgz > > Some notes to the port: > * All unneeded features are left out. > In fact, it is a very sad joke that the only day on which Plan-9 may have a decent browser with sufficient support for CSS2 is the Fool's Day.
1 Apr 2005 09:09
RE: Mozilla port.
Nigel Roles <nigel <at> 9fs.org>
2005-04-01 07:09:17 GMT
2005-04-01 07:09:17 GMT
9fans-bounces+ngr=9fs.org <at> cse.psu.edu wrote: > On 01.04.2005, at 9:51, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > >> Good morning. >> >> Finally, after months of work, it is done; a port of Mozilla: >> http://www.r-36.net/mozilla.tgz >> >> Some notes to the port: >> * All unneeded features are left out. >> > > In fact, it is a very sad joke that the only day on which Plan-9 may > have a decent browser with sufficient support for CSS2 is the Fool's > Day. Mozilla is a decent browser? April Fool I think.
1 Apr 2005 09:11
1 Apr 2005 10:40
Re: Mozilla port.
andrey mirtchovski <mirtchov <at> cpsc.ucalgary.ca>
2005-04-01 08:40:42 GMT
2005-04-01 08:40:42 GMT
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, David Tolpin wrote: >>> In fact, it is a very sad joke that the only day on which Plan-9 may >>> have a decent browser with sufficient support for CSS2 is the Fool's >>> Day. >> >> Mozilla is a decent browser? April Fool I think. > > Which one is? > none. your original statement was incorrect :)
1 Apr 2005 10:52
Re: Mozilla port.
David Tolpin <dvd <at> davidashen.net>
2005-04-01 08:52:33 GMT
2005-04-01 08:52:33 GMT
On 01.04.2005, at 13:40, andrey mirtchovski wrote: >> Which one is? >> > > none. your original statement was incorrect :) > Is it because my original statement was incorrect there are so many screen shots of Plan 9 rio desktops on the net with a vncviewer window to a remote Windows machine running one or another flavor of web browser?
RSS Feed