Eclipse and Eclipse-dev

In response to this thread on the forum --
http://forums.pcbsd.org/showthread.php?p=87907#post87907 -- I've been
looking at the Eclipse and Eclipse-devel PBIs. The Eclipse-devel port is
marked as broken, so I think we can safely write that off for now.

But looking at the Eclipse PBI build log it looks like the PBI didn't
build because it couldn't download all of the port's distfiles. I made a
go of it on my machine tonight and all the files downloaded cleanly, so
maybe the build server ran into a timeout?

Can we force the Eclipse PBI to try to rebuild so we can see if it's
still running into errors?

Thanks,
Jesse

Re: Eclipse and Eclipse-dev

On 07/01/2011 21:45, Jesse Smith wrote:
> In response to this thread on the forum --
> http://forums.pcbsd.org/showthread.php?p=87907#post87907 -- I've been
> looking at the Eclipse and Eclipse-devel PBIs. The Eclipse-devel port is
> marked as broken, so I think we can safely write that off for now.
>
> But looking at the Eclipse PBI build log it looks like the PBI didn't
> build because it couldn't download all of the port's distfiles. I made a
> go of it on my machine tonight and all the files downloaded cleanly, so
> maybe the build server ran into a timeout?
>
> Can we force the Eclipse PBI to try to rebuild so we can see if it's
> still running into errors?
>
> Thanks,
> Jesse
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pbi-dev mailing list
> Pbi-dev@...
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/pbi-dev

Looks like we had some stale distfiles on the build server, cleaned 
those out just now, so hopefully it'll rebuild in next pass.

--

-- 
Kris Moore
PC-BSD Software

PBI module for BRL-CAD

Please find attached my PBI module for BRL-CAD. I think this port may
try to install software in a different prefix than normal as its
description says all its files go into one sub-directory. However, it's
a large port and I haven't tested it. Not sure if this will affect the
PBI build process...
The request for this PBI was made on the forum here:
http://forums.pcbsd.org/showthread.php?t=14697

- Jesse

_______________________________________________
Pbi-dev mailing list
Pbi-dev@...
http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/pbi-dev

Re: PBI module for BRL-CAD

_______________________________________________
Pbi-dev mailing list
Pbi-dev@...
http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/pbi-dev

MyPaint PBI module

Please find attached my PBI module for MyPaint, a simple drawing
application. This PBI was requested on the forum here:
http://forums.pcbsd.org/showthread.php?t=14706

- Jesse

_______________________________________________
Pbi-dev mailing list
Pbi-dev@...
http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/pbi-dev

Re: MyPaint PBI module

_______________________________________________
Pbi-dev mailing list
Pbi-dev@...
http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/pbi-dev

Eclipse PBIs

I was looking at the Eclipse build log as it's still failing to compile
successfully. In both the 64- and 32-bit builds the process is failing
during the build of OpenJDK6. In the 32-bit case it says "sorry,
unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in". In the 64-bit version it
appears to simply stop during the OpenJDK6 build without any error.

Looking at the OpenJDK6 PBI itself, that port is building cleanly. So
apparently OpenJDK6 builds okay independently, but not when it's a
dependency?

Both Eclipse and OpenJDK6 have the same preportmake.sh script. But I
noticed OpenJDK6's pbi.conf file has an extra entry Eclipse does not:

MAKEOPTS="PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES
WITH_WEB=YES
WITH_IPV6=YES"

Maybe this needs to be duplicated in the Eclipse module?

Thoughts?
Jesse

Re: Eclipse PBIs

On 07/19/2011 20:39, Jesse Smith wrote:
> I was looking at the Eclipse build log as it's still failing to compile
> successfully. In both the 64- and 32-bit builds the process is failing
> during the build of OpenJDK6. In the 32-bit case it says "sorry,
> unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in". In the 64-bit version it
> appears to simply stop during the OpenJDK6 build without any error.
>
> Looking at the OpenJDK6 PBI itself, that port is building cleanly. So
> apparently OpenJDK6 builds okay independently, but not when it's a
> dependency?
>
> Both Eclipse and OpenJDK6 have the same preportmake.sh script. But I
> noticed OpenJDK6's pbi.conf file has an extra entry Eclipse does not:
>
> MAKEOPTS="PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES
> WITH_WEB=YES
> WITH_IPV6=YES"
>
> Maybe this needs to be duplicated in the Eclipse module?
>
> Thoughts?
> Jesse
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pbi-dev mailing list
> Pbi-dev@...
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/pbi-dev

That would be my guess as well. We'll get that added to the module and 
see if that fixes the issue :)

--

-- 
Kris Moore
PC-BSD Software
iXsystems

Re: Eclipse PBIs

On 07/19/2011 20:39, Jesse Smith wrote:
> I was looking at the Eclipse build log as it's still failing to compile
> successfully. In both the 64- and 32-bit builds the process is failing
> during the build of OpenJDK6. In the 32-bit case it says "sorry,
> unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in". In the 64-bit version it
> appears to simply stop during the OpenJDK6 build without any error.
>
> Looking at the OpenJDK6 PBI itself, that port is building cleanly. So
> apparently OpenJDK6 builds okay independently, but not when it's a
> dependency?
>
> Both Eclipse and OpenJDK6 have the same preportmake.sh script. But I
> noticed OpenJDK6's pbi.conf file has an extra entry Eclipse does not:
>
> MAKEOPTS="PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES
> WITH_WEB=YES
> WITH_IPV6=YES"
>
> Maybe this needs to be duplicated in the Eclipse module?
>
> Thoughts?
> Jesse
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pbi-dev mailing list
> Pbi-dev@...
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/pbi-dev
Done.

Thanks Jesse!

--

-- 
~Ken Moore

Re: Eclipse PBIs

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Moore <ken@...>
To: pbi-dev@...
Subject: Re: [PC-BSD Pbi-dev] Eclipse PBIs
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 08:37:59 -0400

On 07/19/2011 20:39, Jesse Smith wrote:
> I was looking at the Eclipse build log as it's still failing to compile
> successfully. In both the 64- and 32-bit builds the process is failing
> during the build of OpenJDK6. In the 32-bit case it says "sorry,
> unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in". In the 64-bit version it
> appears to simply stop during the OpenJDK6 build without any error.
>
> Looking at the OpenJDK6 PBI itself, that port is building cleanly. So
> apparently OpenJDK6 builds okay independently, but not when it's a
> dependency?
>
> Both Eclipse and OpenJDK6 have the same preportmake.sh script. But I
> noticed OpenJDK6's pbi.conf file has an extra entry Eclipse does not:
>
> MAKEOPTS="PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES
> WITH_WEB=YES
> WITH_IPV6=YES"
>
> Maybe this needs to be duplicated in the Eclipse module?
>
> Thoughts?
> Jesse
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pbi-dev mailing list
> Pbi-dev@...
> http://lists.pcbsd.org/mailman/listinfo/pbi-dev
Done.

Thanks Jesse!

Sometimes I swear packaging files is like being on a documentary show.

"We've secretly replaced this module's configuration file with a new
one. Let's see what happens."

- Jesse