headers
Colin Barrett | 1 Jul 03:03
Favicon

Re: Is port search intentionally case sensitive?

I had a great email all written up about this, but it got deleted 
before I could send it

Basically it said that I think it should look at ports that match case 
sensitively first, and then those that match case insensitively. 
Although it was much better reasoned.

Colin

On Jun 30, 2004, at 6:36 AM, Will Barton wrote:

> Didn't we have a discussion about this?  If I remember correctly 
> someone had a patch that added a case-sensitivity switch to 
> dportsearch in darwinports1.0 that the search action could use from 
> port.tcl to set case-insensitivity.
>
> I'll take care of this sometime later today.
>
> -Will
>
> On Jun 29, 2004, at 3:25 PM, James Berry wrote:
>
>> The following turned up nothing:
>>
>> 	port search imagemagick
>>
>> In order to find it, I had to do:
>>
>> 	port search ImageMagick
>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Will Barton | 1 Jul 05:52

Re: HEADS-UP: Port Images Merge


On Jun 30, 2004, at 3:32 PM, Paul Guyot wrote:

> À (At) 15:25 -0700 30/06/04, Will Barton écrivait (wrote) :
>> However, image installation WILL NOT be turned on by default.
>
> I definitely wouldn't do this.
>
> We didn't test direct code much. In my opinion, it should only be used 
> for the transition (i.e. ports installed before images are in direct 
> mode). Other operations, including port installation, were not tested.

I've found this out.  I've talked to Felix, Jordan, and Kevin, and have 
decided that we're going to go image mode all the way.  If anyone has a 
problem with that, you can use the base tag I lay down prior to 
merging.

-Will
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
David Leimbach | 1 Jul 06:31
Picon

Re: HEADS-UP: Port Images Merge


On Jun 30, 2004, at 8:52 PM, Will Barton wrote:

>
> On Jun 30, 2004, at 3:32 PM, Paul Guyot wrote:
>
>> À (At) 15:25 -0700 30/06/04, Will Barton écrivait (wrote) :
>>> However, image installation WILL NOT be turned on by default.
>>
>> I definitely wouldn't do this.
>>
>> We didn't test direct code much. In my opinion, it should only be 
>> used for the transition (i.e. ports installed before images are in 
>> direct mode). Other operations, including port installation, were not 
>> tested.
>
> I've found this out.  I've talked to Felix, Jordan, and Kevin, and 
> have decided that we're going to go image mode all the way.  If anyone 
> has a problem with that, you can use the base tag I lay down prior to 
> merging.
>
> -Will

We have to make progress regardless of pain at some point...  Go Will!

Dave

>
> _______________________________________________
> Darwinports mailing list
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Felix Kronlage | 1 Jul 09:10

Re: HEADS-UP: Port Images Merge


On Jun 30, 2004, at 20:52, Will Barton wrote:

>> We didn't test direct code much. In my opinion, it should only be 
>> used for the transition (i.e. ports installed before images are in 
>> direct mode). Other operations, including port installation, were not 
>> tested.
> I've found this out.  I've talked to Felix, Jordan, and Kevin, and 
> have decided that we're going to go image mode all the way.  If anyone 
> has a problem with that, you can use the base tag I lay down prior to 
> merging.

total ok from me.

felix
--
gpg-fingerprint: 076E 1E87 3E05 1C7F B1A0  8A48 0D31 9BD3 D9AC 74D0
Felix Kronlage       | FKR-RIPE            | http://fkr.hazardous.org/
fkr@{bytemine.net|opendarwin.org}  | http://opendarwin.org/~fkr/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Chris Ridd | 1 Jul 16:59
Favicon

RSS feed

I can't recall who set up the RSS feed, but would it be possible to alter it
so that the headlines included the port being updated, or "base" if it was
the base?

Currently we get stuff like:

version bump.
Updated to release 3.3.0
Updated to release 3.2.0
Updated to release 0.5.0
Add missing md5 checksums; replace ...

It would be much more useful like this:

sysutils/clamav - version bump.
ruby/rb-arrayfields - Updated to release 3.3.0
ruby/rb-arrayfields - Updated to release 3.2.0
ruby/rb-sys-host - Updated to release 0.5.0
games/fortune - Add missing md5 checksums; replace ...

Cheers,

Chris
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jordan Hubbard | 1 Jul 18:16

Re: HEADS-UP: Port Images Merge

Go Will!

I can only think of reasons why you SHOULD do this.  Even if it 
necessitated users reinstalling each and every port they had installed 
(as painful such an extreme case might be), it would STILL be worth it 
because of the forward progress we'd be making.  I'm also in violent 
agreement with Paul that images mode should be the default, not direct 
mode.  Even with the testing argument set aside, it's images mode that 
gives us the real gains and represents the usage model we'd like to be 
promoting going forward.

- Jordan

On Jun 30, 2004, at 3:25 PM, Will Barton wrote:

> That's about all I can think of right now.  This is a heads-up mail.  
> If anyone thinks images should not be merged with HEAD, speak now.  I 
> plan to do this as soon as I get the chance (due to the pressure from 
> everyone that's here at WWDC ;).
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Yoshiyuki Haraoka | 1 Jul 04:03
Favicon

late info: dports snapshots

Hi.I have late information ;-)

It's made to take the snapshot of dports from March 14, 2004.
It's individually required and was made to take.

ftp://ftp.allbsd.org/pub/OpenDarwin/tar_files/

Other archives will be placed if there is a request.

http://allbsd.org/

-- Yoshiyuki Haraoka
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Will Barton | 1 Jul 19:56

HEADS-UP: Port Images Committed

Hi All,

Well, this is a day most all of you were waiting for I'm sure.  I have 
committed the changes that were made in the Port Images branch 
(wbb4-versionfoobage-1) that I started and Paul Guyot completed into 
HEAD.  After a couple of bumps, I think everything should be good.  If 
not, please let me know on irc (I'm 'wbb4') or by email.

Image installs ARE THE DEFAULT.  It is highly recommended that you 
simply blow away your existing ${prefix}.  That doesn't mean that image 
installs won't work along side old direct installs, however, we can't 
predict the behavior.

For those of you who do not feel comfortable with this, you can use the 
pre-images tag on base, 'pre-wbb4-images'.  This gives you the 
DarwinPorts base system as it was prior to the images merge.

To get and use Port Images:
	% cd darwinports/base
		(Or the location of your copy of the darwinports source)
	% make distclean
	% cvs -q update -PAd
	% ./configure (your configure arguments here)
	% make
	% sudo make install

To get and continue to use the old, pre-images base:
	% cd darwinports/base
	% cvs -q update -PAd -r pre-wbb4-images
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 11 comments |
headers
Jordan Hubbard | 1 Jul 20:18

Re: HEADS-UP: Port Images Committed

Yay!  Thanks, Will!  This day has been a long time coming and I, for 
one, am very happy to see it here! :)

- Jordan

On Jul 1, 2004, at 10:56 AM, Will Barton wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Well, this is a day most all of you were waiting for I'm sure.  I have 
> committed the changes that were made in the Port Images branch 
> (wbb4-versionfoobage-1) that I started and Paul Guyot completed into 
> HEAD.  After a couple of bumps, I think everything should be good.  If 
> not, please let me know on irc (I'm 'wbb4') or by email.
>
> Image installs ARE THE DEFAULT.  It is highly recommended that you 
> simply blow away your existing ${prefix}.  That doesn't mean that 
> image installs won't work along side old direct installs, however, we 
> can't predict the behavior.
>
> For those of you who do not feel comfortable with this, you can use 
> the pre-images tag on base, 'pre-wbb4-images'.  This gives you the 
> DarwinPorts base system as it was prior to the images merge.
>
> To get and use Port Images:
> 	% cd darwinports/base
> 		(Or the location of your copy of the darwinports source)
> 	% make distclean
> 	% cvs -q update -PAd
> 	% ./configure (your configure arguments here)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Landon Fuller | 1 Jul 20:47

Re: HEADS-UP: Port Images Committed

Congratulations and Hurray. Fantastic work.

-Landon

On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:56:59AM -0700, Will Barton wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Well, this is a day most all of you were waiting for I'm sure.  I have 
> committed the changes that were made in the Port Images branch 
> (wbb4-versionfoobage-1) that I started and Paul Guyot completed into 
> HEAD.  After a couple of bumps, I think everything should be good.  If 
> not, please let me know on irc (I'm 'wbb4') or by email.
> 
> Image installs ARE THE DEFAULT.  It is highly recommended that you 
> simply blow away your existing ${prefix}.  That doesn't mean that image 
> installs won't work along side old direct installs, however, we can't 
> predict the behavior.
> 
> For those of you who do not feel comfortable with this, you can use the 
> pre-images tag on base, 'pre-wbb4-images'.  This gives you the 
> DarwinPorts base system as it was prior to the images merge.
> 
> To get and use Port Images:
> 	% cd darwinports/base
> 		(Or the location of your copy of the darwinports source)
> 	% make distclean
> 	% cvs -q update -PAd
> 	% ./configure (your configure arguments here)
> 	% make
> 	% sudo make install
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane