gtk install errors

When I try and install gtk i get this error:

Error: Target com.apple.install returned: Another
version of Port gtk is already registered as
installed.  Please uninstall the port first.

anyone know how to fix it?
i don't have gtk already installed, but i do have gtk2
installed. this however shouldn't effect it since they
are two different trunks.  

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

CVS Logon errors

Any help appreciated.

ryan <at> ryeti ~ => cvs -d :pserver:anonymous <at> anoncvs.opendarwin.org:/Volumes/src/cvs/od login
(Logging in to anonymous <at> anoncvs.opendarwin.org)
CVS password: 
cvs [login aborted]: recv() from server anoncvs.opendarwin.org: Connection reset by peer

thanks

-ryan

Re: Are the starting instructions still accurate?

On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:36:42PM +0100, Bjoern Hoffmann wrote:

> >:pserver:anonymous <at> anoncvs.opendarwin.org:/Volumes/src/cvs/od login
> >(Logging in to anonymous <at> anoncvs.opendarwin.org)
> >CVS password:       .... return hit ...
> >cvs [login aborted]: recv() from server anoncvs.opendarwin.org: 
> >Connection reset by peer
> > dun> cvs -d 
> >:pserver:anonymous <at> anoncvs.opendarwin.org:/Volumes/src/cvs/od co -P 
> >darwinports
> >cvs [checkout aborted]: recv() from server anoncvs.opendarwin.org: 
> >Connection reset by peer
> >Is this a result of the recent server mover or a quirk of 7D15 that 
> >needs to be bugged?
> Nope, getting the same thing here. Was trying to update my portindex 
> and the darwinports base files to no avail.

it's our cvs server that is having issues. It should be resolved in the
course of monday (US-time).

-fkr
--

-- 
gpg-fingerprint: 076E 1E87 3E05 1C7F B1A0  8A48 0D31 9BD3 D9AC 74D0 
Felix Kronlage  | FKR-RIPE        | http://www.hazardous.org/fkr/
fkr@{grummel.net|opendarwin.org}  | http://www.opendarwin.org/~fkr/ 

_______________________________________________
Darwinports mailing list
Darwinports <at> opendarwin.org

Bugs #1252, #1253 and #1254 filled in against the ethereal port

	Hello everybody, just a small message to point out the following 
simple and short bugs filed in against the ethereal port:

#1252, Lack of contents listing of the ethereal port by the port(1) 
utility:
http://www.opendarwin.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1252

#1253, New release of ethereal out:
http://www.opendarwin.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1253

#1254, Non X11 build variant request for the ethereal port:
http://www.opendarwin.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1254

	They are simple and short, low severity bugs, nothing to be alarmed 
about! Thank you all for your attention,...

		Juan

- Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which can be 
adequately explained by stupidity".

Re: Bugs #1252, #1253 and #1254 filled in against the ethereal port

I actually purposefully removed the (somewhat problematic) non-X11 variant for 
ethereal.
I'm curious - what do you use tethereal for that tcpdump does not already do?

Landon

On Monday 01 December 2003 10:27 pm, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
> #1254, Non X11 build variant request for the ethereal port:
> http://www.opendarwin.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1254

Re: Bugs #1252, #1253 and #1254 filled in against the ethereal port

	Hi Landon. Why is the non-X11 ethereal variant problematic? That 
really beats me! And why I prefer tethereal over tcpdump? Simple, very 
simple... I don't like tcpdump! First time I used it I didn't like the 
way it handles the packets according to the flags passed, didn't enjoy 
the way it displays the output either. That kept me from using it and 
reading its man page, which in turn meant I didn't learn to use it very 
well. During all this I had recollections of tethereal and how I liked 
it in my Linux days, and then I discovered the port is offered through 
DarwinPorts.... Added are two facts: one, I have a small drive; second, 
I'm not an X11 fan. So why add all that overhead for something that 
I'll be using only at the command line? See my point?

	And what I was thinking is that it is nice to offer the choice, for 
those who don't want to use ethereal the simple option to only build 
tethereal is there, offered right out of the box! Currently you can do 
it by hacking the local copy of the Portfile, but you risk screwing 
something up if you don't know what you're doing (as it actually 
happened to me!). Hope that explains it!

	Regards,...

		Juan

On Dec 2, 2003, at 4:32 AM, Landon Fuller wrote:

> I actually purposefully removed the (somewhat problematic) non-X11 
> variant for
> ethereal.
> I'm curious - what do you use tethereal for that tcpdump does not 

Re: Bugs #1252, #1253 and #1254 filled in against the ethereal port

Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:

>     And what I was thinking is that it is nice to offer the choice, for 
> those who don't want to use ethereal the simple option to only build 
> tethereal is there, offered right out of the box! Currently you can do 
> it by hacking the local copy of the Portfile, but you risk screwing 
> something up if you don't know what you're doing (as it actually 
> happened to me!). Hope that explains it!
> 

if you provide a "good-looking" patch with a no-x variant, that isnt 
troublesome - you provide a better argument.

suggestions are good - patches better :)

Ole

--

-- 
DarwinPorts committer, www.opendarwin.org/~olegb

Spam

People,

I know there has been this debate about allowing outside posting. Fine, 
but the way it is handled right now is unacceptable. This is the 5th 
Spam post I received today via DarwinPorts ML I believe and that is too 
much. I think either the list should be closed to outside postings, or 
postings can only be done from non-subscribers via a form. And just a 
slight hint. Putting e-mail adresses in plain dude <at> dude.com form or as 
mailto: links on the website is an open invitation for spammers. At 
least put it on like Sourceforge does as plain text "dude AT " dude DOT 
com".
Cheers,

Bjoern Hoffmann

Re: Spam

On 2/12/03 4:54 pm, Bjoern Hoffmann <bjoern.hoffmann <at> stud.uni-muenchen.de>
wrote:

> People,
> 
> I know there has been this debate about allowing outside posting. Fine,
> but the way it is handled right now is unacceptable. This is the 5th
> Spam post I received today via DarwinPorts ML I believe and that is too
> much. I think either the list should be closed to outside postings, or
> postings can only be done from non-subscribers via a form. And just a

Isn't there a spam filter on the list?

> slight hint. Putting e-mail adresses in plain dude <at> dude.com form or as
> mailto: links on the website is an open invitation for spammers. At
> least put it on like Sourceforge does as plain text "dude AT " dude DOT
> com".

Whatever it is that serves the Portfiles from the web server (eg
<http://darwinports.opendarwin.org/darwinports/dports/aqua/Fire/Portfile>)
would also need tweaking to obfuscate email addresses inside portfiles.

Cheers,

Chris

Re: gtk install errors

On Nov 30, 2003, at 5:21 PM, Tristan O'Tierney wrote:
> When I try and install gtk i get this error:
>
> Error: Target com.apple.install returned: Another version of Port gtk 
> is already registered as installed.  Please uninstall the port first.
>
> anyone know how to fix it?  i don't have gtk already installed, but i 
> do have gtk2 installed. this however shouldn't effect it since they 
> are two different trunks.

Hmm.  I wonder if this is a result of the new-ish uninstall stuff since 
having both installed definitely used to work.  I'll try to take a look 
at it this weekend once I have internet access at home again (PS: 
moving sucks).

- jim

--

-- 
jim mock <mij@{soupnazi|opendarwin}.org>       work: jim <at> streamzap.com
http://soupnazi.org             Streamzap, Inc. | http://streamzap.com