headers
Rod.. Whitworth | 1 Nov 2006 01:28

Re: Via C7 fully supported?

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:03:24 -0700 (MST), Diana Eichert wrote:

>And the commell only has 2 1Gb NICs instead of 4.
>
Have a look at the LE565 with (IIRC) 4*1Gb and serial access to the
BIOS (they say, I haven't seen one yet.)

HTH

From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?

Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list.
Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.
Your IP address will also be greytrapped for 24 hours after any attempt. 
I am continually amazed by the people who run OpenBSD who don't take this advice. I always expected a smarter
class. I guess not.
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Theo de Raadt | 1 Nov 2006 01:16
Picon
Favicon

OpenBSD 4.0 released Nov 1, 2006

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nov 1, 2006.

We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.0.
This is our 20th release on CD-ROM (and 21st via FTP).  We remain
proud of OpenBSD's record of ten years with only a single remote
hole in the default install.  As in our previous releases, 4.0
provides significant improvements, including new features, in nearly
all areas of the system:

- New/extended platforms:
    o OpenBSD/armish.
      Various ARM-based appliances, using the Redboot boot loader, currently
      only supporting the Thecus N2100 and IOData HDL-G.
    o OpenBSD/sparc64.
      UltraSPARC III based machines are now supported!
    o OpenBSD/zaurus.
      Support for the Zaurus SL-C3200. 

- Improved hardware support, including:
    o New msk(4) driver for Marvell/SysKonnect Yukon-2 Gigabit Ethernet.
    o New bnx(4) driver for Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet.
    o New xge(4) driver for Neterion Xframe/Xframe II 10Gb Ethernet.
    o New rum(4) driver for Ralink Technology 2nd gen USB IEEE
      802.11a/b/g wireless.
    o New acx(4) driver for Texas Instruments ACX100/ACX111
      IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless.
    o New pgt(4) driver for Connexant/Intersil Prism GT Full-MAC
      IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless.
    o New uath(4) driver for Atheros USB IEEE 802.11a/b/g wireless.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dag Richards | 1 Nov 2006 01:17
Favicon

Re: Need help with NAT + IPSEC

Johan Hedin wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I need help with our IPSEC setup. We have an internal net 
> 192.168.1.0/24. We have IPSEC to a customer on net 10.92.0.0/16. 
> However, they already used the 192.168.1.0 net, so the IPSEC tunnel is 
> to 10.84.230.0/28. I have set up 10.84.230.1 on the internal network 
> interface (hme3), and added a manual route to 10.92.0.0/16 via 
> 10.84.230.1. All works perfect on the firewall. On the internal net 
> however, I can not reach the 10.92 net. I have tried to nat 192.168.1.0 
> via 10.84.230.1. NAT works, but the packets are thrown back out on hme3 
> with 10.84.230.1 as source address and to via enc0 as I want. How would 
> one solve this?
> 
> TIA
> 
> Johan Hedin
> CTO eCare AB
> 
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
> 

Hi
this has been discussed here before ....
 From the man page
-----------------------------------
NAT can also be applied to enc# interfaces, but special care should be
taken because of the interactions between NAT and the IPsec flow 
matching, especially on the packet output path.  Inside the TCP/IP 
stack,packets go through the following stages:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Damian Wiest | 1 Nov 2006 02:26
Favicon

Re: Lenovo notebooks

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:57:27PM +0200, ropers wrote:
> On 26/10/06, stuartv <stuartv <at> datalinesys.com> wrote:
> >>On 10/26/06, Johan P. Lindstrvm <johan.p.lindstrom <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You should really get yours too, not buying the CD's will not improve
> >>> the hardware support now will it?
> >>
> >>
> >>The way it works here is "boss, I need to buy an openbsd license for each
> >>openbsd box we run.  It's $50 each, + shipping.  Sign here please".
> >>
> >>Speaking of that, I need to get off my ass and buy my 4.0 licenses 
> >already.
> >>
> >
> >Awww... Too late for that for me, I had to use the whole "Look Boss, it's
> >free" line along with plenty of documentation that OpenBSD is as secure as
> >it gets for them to let me put in the first OpenBSD box.  They are pretty
> >happy with them so far.  I'm going to try to hit them up with the whole
> >"Wouldn't it be nice to support such a great project that we use so much"
> >argument as soon as things slow down here a bit and there is time to chat.
> >That should work.
> >
> >stuart
> 
> That's what I'm planning to do as well... but it may be a pipe dream
> -- the single small department that I sysadmin for on a part time
> basis took a lot of convincing to even let me put in that one OpenBSD
> firewall... OTOH, if I wait half a year and we haven't gotten the
> Windows 2003 server rootkitted again by that time, I may have a much
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Damian Wiest | 1 Nov 2006 02:41
Favicon

Re: OpenBSD Wiki

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 08:52:20PM -0500, Kenny Mann wrote:
> Dudes,
> 
> Many months ago I started a website called OpenBSD-Wiki (located at 
> http://www.openbsd-wiki.org).
> 
> The orginal goal was pretty selfish: Document what it took to get my 
> systems going so I wouldn't forget.
> 
> I'm not a complete moron (eek! I hope!) , but I'm no where near as 
> skilled as many on this list -- so I needed some documentation for 
> myself. Wiki seemed to make the most sense, especially considering that 
> many articles on the web are out of date and could use some minor (and 
> sometimes major) adjustments.
> 
> As I lurked the misc <at>  list, I found some pretty helpful things, emailed 
> the offer off-list asking if their works can be placed on that site 
> released under the BSD license and so far everyone I've asked has been 
> kind enough to say yes.
> 
> Anyone is welcome to create articles or create content they think is 
> useful for other people to know (so long as either you or the original 
> author will release it under the BSD license).
> 
> As far as how thinks should be organized and all that, I haven't 
> entirely thought that through and am open to suggestions. My orginal 
> thoughts where to make it close to the Gentoo-Wiki project (located at: 
> http://www.gentoo-wiki.org).
> 
> I've been pretty busy lately and haven't had time to produce as many
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
J.C. Roberts | 1 Nov 2006 01:44

Re: OpenBSD 4.0 released Nov 1, 2006

On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:16:08 -0700, Theo de Raadt
<deraadt <at> cvs.openbsd.org> wrote:

>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Nov 1, 2006.
>
>We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 4.0.

Congratulations to Theo, all the developers and everyone who helped out!

Kind Regards,
J.C. Roberts

--
Free, Open Source CAD, CAM and EDA Tools
http://www.DesignTools.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Damian Wiest | 1 Nov 2006 02:59
Favicon

Re: Sun x2100 M2 DMESG weirdenn and remote access. OpenBSD 4.0

On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 09:17:11AM -0700, Pawel S. Veselov wrote:
> stan wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:11:43PM -0700, Pawel S. Veselov wrote:
> >  
> >>Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> >>    
> >>>stan wrote:
> >>>      
> >>>>That's actually not a given IFIRK Sun says the RAID on the 2100's
> >>>>is "Windows only".
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>Why Sun picks that kinda hardware for it's servers, is another kinda
> >>question.... But the controller manufacturers play evil here...
> >>
> >>    
> >
> >Might be beacuse these machines are about $750US each list.
> >
> >  
> What about v65x then ? :)

I don't know if I mentioned this already, but the Intel Gigabit Ethernet 
chip on Sun's AMD64 systems isn't even supported under Solaris.  
Windows drivers only.  I have heard rumors that a recent build
of OpenSolaris includes driver support though.

-Damian
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Damian Wiest | 1 Nov 2006 03:10
Favicon

Re: understanding the kernel

On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:18:28PM -0700, George Mihai IACOB wrote:
> Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 08:24:16PM -0700, George Mihai IACOB wrote:
> >>Hello!
> >>
> >>I am a not-so-experienced programmer and I started a personal project 
> >>which requires a deep understanding of the OpenBSD kernel - no, I am not 
> >>going to fork another BSD style operating system. I wonder if there is 
> >>documentation describing the kernel, other that the comments in the 
> >>source. For a start, I am reading Andrew Tanenbaum's "Modern Operating 
> >>Systems", 2nd edition and trying to follow the code in the kernel 
> >>source, starting with sys/kern/init_main.c
> >>Is this a wrong approach? Do you have other suggestions? I know there's 
> >>no easy way and I am not looking for one, all I want is a starting point.
> >>Regards,
> >>George
> >
> >You don't mention what you had in mind so it is hard to point at anything.
> >"The Design and Implementation of the 4.4 BSD Operating System" by
> >McKusick and friends is likely to be more relevant for implementation
> >details, Tanebaum's book is more high level theory.
> >
> 
> Well, I want to be able to write software which should run in kernel 
> mode and/or modify the kernel. Basically, I'm just like a college 
> student taking an operating systems course and using OpenBSD as an example.

"Operating System Concepts" by Silbershatz, Galvin and Gagne:
http://codex.cs.yale.edu/avi/os-book/os7/
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Daniel Ouellet | 1 Nov 2006 03:14

Sun T1 105

I am looking for some feedback on this DMESG if possible.

I am playing with an old Sun T1 105 and does look like it work well, but 
I never saw so many not configure message in a single DMESG.

Can anyone clue me in. Is that really normal, did I most likely forgot 
something, etc.

That's my first time with this Sum hardware type, so I am not sure as to 
what's normal or not.

Thanks

Daniel

Here the dmesg.

==============================
dmesg console is /pci <at> 1f,0/pci <at> 1,1/ebus <at> 1/su <at> 14,3803f8
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
         The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2006 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. 
http://www.OpenBSD.org

OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #953: Sun Sep 17 00:56:22 MDT 2006
     deraadt <at> sparc64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/sparc64/compile/GENERIC
total memory = 1073741824
avail memory = 969629696
using 6553 buffers containing 53682176 bytes of memory
bootpath: /pci <at> 1f,0/pci <at> 1,1/scsi <at> 2,0/disk <at> 0,0
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
sushiandbeer | 1 Nov 2006 03:22
Picon

Re: Sun x2100 M2 DMESG weirdenn and remote access. OpenBSD 4.0

On 31-Oct-06, at 3:59 PM, Damian Wiest wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 09:17:11AM -0700, Pawel S. Veselov wrote:
>> stan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:11:43PM -0700, Pawel S. Veselov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Daniel Ouellet wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> stan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's actually not a given IFIRK Sun says the RAID on the 2100's
>>>>>> is "Windows only".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> Why Sun picks that kinda hardware for it's servers, is another  
>>>> kinda
>>>> question.... But the controller manufacturers play evil here...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Might be beacuse these machines are about $750US each list.
>>>
>>>
>> What about v65x then ? :)
>
> I don't know if I mentioned this already, but the Intel Gigabit  
> Ethernet
> chip on Sun's AMD64 systems isn't even supported under Solaris.
> Windows drivers only.  I have heard rumors that a recent build
> of OpenSolaris includes driver support though.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |

Gmane