1 Dec 2005 17:30
ok to remove DDB_ONPANIC=1 from XEN{0,U}?
Greg Troxel <gdt <at> ir.bbn.com>
2005-12-01 16:30:28 GMT
2005-12-01 16:30:28 GMT
After splitting GENERIC.local/INSTALL.local, I'm going over my configs and putting what I want (IPSEC, stf(4)) in GENERIC.local. I found that I also had disabled DDB_ONPANIC, and think this doesn't belong in XEN's GENERIC equivalent since it is unsuitable for production. Any objections to committing the following? Index: XEN0 =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/XEN0,v retrieving revision 1.22 diff -u -r1.22 XEN0 --- XEN0 25 Nov 2005 16:41:31 -0000 1.22 +++ XEN0 1 Dec 2005 16:28:06 -0000 <at> <at> -56,7 +56,7 <at> <at> options DEBUG # expensive debugging checks/support options KMEMSTATS # kernel memory statistics (vmstat -m) options DDB # in-kernel debugger -options DDB_ONPANIC=1 # see also sysctl(8): `ddb.onpanic' +#options DDB_ONPANIC=1 # see also sysctl(8): `ddb.onpanic' options DDB_HISTORY_SIZE=512 # enable history editing in DDB #options KGDB # remote debugger #options KGDB_DEVNAME="\"com\"",KGDB_DEVADDR=0x2f8,KGDB_DEVRATE=57600 Index: XENU =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/XENU,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 XENU --- XENU 25 Nov 2005 16:41:31 -0000 1.13 +++ XENU 1 Dec 2005 16:28:06 -0000 <at> <at> -53,7 +53,7 <at> <at>(Continue reading)
RSS Feed