headers
David Brownlee | 4 Nov 2010 10:30
Gravatar

macdep.sleep_state=3 panic on T500

Tried to put my T500 to sleep (amd64, GENERIC 5.99.39 kernel from 24th
oct) and it panics.

Testing booting -s and:

# sysctl -w macdep.sleep_state=3
acpi0: entering state S3
Flushing disk caches: done
uvm_fault(0xffff800047cf5b80, 0x0, 4) -> e
fatal page fault in supervisor mode
trap type 6 code 10 rip 0 cs0 rflags 10246 cr2  0 cpl 6 rsp 0xffff800047cf5b80
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped in pid 8.1 (sysctl) at  0:     invalid address
db{1}>

NetBSD forsaken 5.99.39 NetBSD 5.99.39 (GENERIC) #0: Sun Oct 24 amd64

anyone have any thoughts as to what I might look at?

thanks
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Greg Kerr | 16 Nov 2010 14:18

Re: HEAD amd64 kernel no boot

Jeremy C. Reed <reed <at> reedmedia.net> writes:

> 
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Jared D. McNeill wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > > Booted amd64 GENERIC head today with boot -v. It hung at:

Any follow up on this issue? Still present in CURRENT on 2011-11-16
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Morten Gulbrandsen (Java programmer | 27 Nov 2010 10:11

test


test
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Morten Gulbrandsen (Java programmer | 27 Nov 2010 10:13

Motherboard chipset for NetBSD 5.1


Hello,

I have this motherboard in my mind:

GA-870A-UD3 (rev. 2.1)

http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3517#ov

I will continue to use my 3COM NIC and purchase a standard NVidia Video
card, sometimes new computers or newer hardware components has problems
with both linux and BSD.

Are there anything known about NetBSD and the HCL Hardware Compatibility
List. I want to run latest 32 and 64 bits NetBSD and I'd like to deploy
some OpenGL graphics for the video card.

Which Motherboard can you safely recommend;
given a six core AMD Phenom II CPU?

Sincerely yours,

藻留天  具留部覧度船
Morten Gulbrandsen
_____________________________________________________________________
Java programmer, C++ programmer
CAcert Assurer, GSWoT introducer, thawte Notary
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail!
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Morten Gulbrandsen (Java programmer | 29 Nov 2010 13:27

Re: Motherboard chipset for NetBSD 5.1


On 11/27/10 10:13 AM, Morten Gulbrandsen (Java programmer) wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have this motherboard in my mind:
> 
> GA-870A-UD3 (rev. 2.1)
> 
> http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3517#ov
> 

I got this reply from Gigabyte:

===
 	Dear Mr. Gulbrandsen,

Thank you for emailing GIGABYTE.
We are delighted with your interest in our products.

I'm sorry to inform you that we do NOT officially support any
non-Windows operation system. The only possible way for you to check
with is to visit the NetBSD website/Forum or the chipset makers'
website, like AMD, Realtek, etc.

Wish you luck!

===

AMD is no problem they make excellent support and any issue will be
resolved,  How well does NetBSD or any BSD scale on six cores?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Christoph Egger | 30 Nov 2010 09:21
Picon
Picon

Re: Motherboard chipset for NetBSD 5.1


The board is not the problem. If you have trouble with
booting NetBSD SMP then you might be affected by the C1E errata.
A workaround has been applied to -current today.
It should be applied to NetBSD 5.1, too.

W/o the workaround you should be able to boot NetBSD with ACPI
and w/o SMP at least.

Christoph

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 11/27/10 10:13 AM, Morten Gulbrandsen (Java programmer) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have this motherboard in my mind:
> > 
> > GA-870A-UD3 (rev. 2.1)
> > 
> > http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3517#ov
> > 
> 
> I got this reply from Gigabyte:
> 
> ===
>  	Dear Mr. Gulbrandsen,
> 
> Thank you for emailing GIGABYTE.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jörn Clausen | 1 Dec 2010 20:36

lockup of Atom 330 machine?

Hi!

I just migrated my personal web server to an Atom 330 based machine.
After about one day "in the wild", the machine locked up. According to
the logs (e.g. /var/log/cron) the machine was completely frozen until
I resetted it. A dmesg output is attached. Are there any known
problems with this hardware? Is there anything I can trim from the
kernel? I have no physical access to the machine, so I am limited in
my possibilities to debug it.

cpuid reports

"         Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D510    <at>  1.66GHz"

dmesg output is (MAC address removed)

Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005,
    2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
    The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
    The Regents of the University of California.  All rights reserved.

NetBSD 5.1 (GENERIC) #0: Sat Nov  6 13:19:33 UTC 2010
	builds <at> b6.netbsd.org:/home/builds/ab/netbsd-5-1-RELEASE/amd64/201011061943Z-obj/home/builds/ab/netbsd-5-1-RELEASE/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
total memory = 2031 MB
avail memory = 1953 MB
timecounter: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80<clock_battery>
timecounter: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 100
SMBIOS rev. 2.5  <at>  0xe4410 (25 entries)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Aleksey Cheusov | 1 Dec 2010 23:03
Picon
Favicon

Re: lockup of Atom 330 machine?

> Hi!

> I just migrated my personal web server to an Atom 330 based machine.
> After about one day "in the wild", the machine locked up. According to
> the logs (e.g. /var/log/cron) the machine was completely frozen until
> I resetted it. A dmesg output is attached. Are there any known
> problems with this hardware? Is there anything I can trim from the
> kernel? I have no physical access to the machine, so I am limited in
> my possibilities to debug it.

I've been using NetBSD on Atom330-based machine since autumn 2009
as a workstation. I cannot remember any hangs up. Though I had some
problems with it.

HDD.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2010/01/08/msg001046.html
I'm still using the patch proposed by Joerg.
I haven't checked whether it is still necessary, though.

USB.
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.os.netbsd.devel.performance
This was a temporary problem. I don't know how to reproduce it.
I rarely use flashes.

USB.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2010/07/12/msg001210.html
I don't know answers to those questions.

Audio.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2010/03/14/msg005815.html
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Christoph Egger | 30 Nov 2010 09:21
Picon
Picon

Re: Motherboard chipset for NetBSD 5.1


The board is not the problem. If you have trouble with
booting NetBSD SMP then you might be affected by the C1E errata.
A workaround has been applied to -current today.
It should be applied to NetBSD 5.1, too.

W/o the workaround you should be able to boot NetBSD with ACPI
and w/o SMP at least.

Christoph

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 11/27/10 10:13 AM, Morten Gulbrandsen (Java programmer) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I have this motherboard in my mind:
> > 
> > GA-870A-UD3 (rev. 2.1)
> > 
> > http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3517#ov
> > 
> 
> I got this reply from Gigabyte:
> 
> ===
>  	Dear Mr. Gulbrandsen,
> 
> Thank you for emailing GIGABYTE.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane