Robertdkeys | 12 Mar 2003 04:55
Picon
Favicon

PMAZ-A scsi turbochannel card in NetBSD alpha or pmax

Can anyone comment on whether or not the PMAZ-A scsi
turbochannel card will work correctly, and is supported in
a DEC 3000 300 LX alpha or a DECstation 5000 25?
I found a card in the junque bin, and am thinking it might
be nice to run an external scsi tower with 6 drives on one
of the above machines.  Obviously, the alpha would be the
machine of choice if it works on that box.  But, I am
thinking the card did work and may have come from a
DECstation 5000/200 box, so it ought to work, if nothing
else, in the little 5000/25, maybe?

Any insights are appreciated.

Thanks

Bob Keys

Christopher Tribo | 12 Mar 2003 19:29

Re: PMAZ-A scsi turbochannel card in NetBSD alpha or pmax

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 Robertdkeys <at> aol.com wrote:

> Can anyone comment on whether or not the PMAZ-A scsi
> turbochannel card will work correctly, and is supported in
> a DEC 3000 300 LX alpha or a DECstation 5000 25?
<snip>

It will work in both.

--

-- 
I'm trying to port NetBSD to my cup of tea, but it keeps kernel panicking 
on refill. This is odd, because I ported it to my toaster and my bookcase 
easily enough and it survives bread- and book-replacement fine.

Any hints?

Jared Earle - http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-ports/2002/07/04/0000.html

Matthew N. Dodd | 21 Mar 2003 20:32

cricket/rrdtool/perl weirdness?

I'm using 1.6 on my 5000/240.

The perl module interface to rrdtool doesn't work at all.  (Verify by
manually running 'make test' in the right subdir of the work tree.)

Can anyone else confirm this?

--

-- 
| Matthew N. Dodd  | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD  |
| winter <at> jurai.net |       2 x '84 Volvo 245DL        | ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http://www.jurai.net/~winter |  For Great Justice!  | ISO8802.5 4ever |

Manuel Bouyer | 22 Mar 2003 17:51

Re: cricket/rrdtool/perl weirdness?

On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:32:52PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> I'm using 1.6 on my 5000/240.
> 
> The perl module interface to rrdtool doesn't work at all.  (Verify by
> manually running 'make test' in the right subdir of the work tree.)
> 
> Can anyone else confirm this?

I'm successfully using cricket and smokeping (both perl-based) with
the rrdtool from pkgsrc. However, I cant' build perl at all on a mipseb
machine, so maybe perl itself has some problems with mips ?

--

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer <at> antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--

Manuel Bouyer | 22 Mar 2003 17:52

Re: cricket/rrdtool/perl weirdness?

On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 05:51:27PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:32:52PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> > I'm using 1.6 on my 5000/240.
> > 
> > The perl module interface to rrdtool doesn't work at all.  (Verify by
> > manually running 'make test' in the right subdir of the work tree.)
> > 
> > Can anyone else confirm this?
> 
> I'm successfully using cricket and smokeping (both perl-based) with
> the rrdtool from pkgsrc. However, I cant' build perl at all on a mipseb

I forgot to add: on i386 and sparc systems

> machine, so maybe perl itself has some problems with mips ?

--

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer <at> antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 24 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--

Collin Baillie | 25 Mar 2003 04:57

DEC Documentation Microfische anyone?

After being on the lists a while ago, I've seen people ask for docs all the
time. Is this anyuse to any of the developers?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3407871423&category=1247

Perhaps I should join again.

Collin Baillie 
--

-- 

Masao Uebayashi | 27 Mar 2003 05:39
Picon

Emacs 20 test request

Hello.

I have a patch which I'm merging into the Pkgsrc tree.  I want to see
if this patch affects Emacs 20 (editors/emacs) on NetBSD/pmax.

According to the log of pkgsrc/editors/emacs/patches/patch-af
Rev. 1.4, NetBSD/pmax can't use the dump (unexec) feature, and some
tricks are needed to build/link a temacs executable.  I don't really
understand the details of the problem, but I wonder if Buildlink2 will
implicitly resolve a part of the fix.

The test procedure is,

		 1) Update whole Pkgsrc tree.
		 2) Move to pkgsrc/editors/emacs.
		 3) Do `make clean'.
		 4) Do `patch -p0 < .../the-patch-below'.
		 5) Do `make >log 2>errlog'.
		 6) Check if `./work/emacs-20.7/src/emacs -q -nw'
                    works.
		 7) Send me the `log' and `errlog' files.

Note that Emacs don't work with X if the executable is linked with
ld(1) Ver. 2.13.2.1 or later.

Masao

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/editors/emacs/Makefile,v
(Continue reading)


Gmane