1 Aug 2002 03:13
Re: db> message after some hours (using Serial Console only)
M L Riechers <mlr <at> rse.com>
2002-08-01 01:13:32 GMT
2002-08-01 01:13:32 GMT
To: M L Riechers <mlr <at> rse.com> cc: <port-macppc <at> netbsd.org> Subject: Re: db> message after some hours (using Serial Console only) In-Reply-To: <200207292225.SAA22994 <at> nnwest.rse.com> Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0207311003260.4062-100000 <at> vespasia.home-net.internetconnect.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: port-macppc-owner <at> netbsd.org On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, M L Riechers wrote: On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 10:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Bill Studenmund <wrstuden <at> netbsd.org> averred: > ... > Doh, yes. Actually TxD would probably be better. Hmmmmmm. (Mumble, mumble, mumble, etc, etc. as he mulls "good positive feedback"). Perhaps you're right about that -- if the ne'redowells are _really_ grounding the RD+ differential inputs. >> Perhaps a better idea would be to use GND instead of DTR? > > No. The spec says (for RS-232) a space (0) is > +3 V, and a mark is < -3 > V. Ground is not a valid voltage. Using ground relies on the hysteresis of > the receiver. You're right, of course. The specs really do say that. However, most RS-232 receivers (and all of those I've used and/or run across) are perfectly happy receiving data switched between ground and, say +5(Continue reading)
a number of the line driver makers came up w/ chips
that had +5V/GND in, yet supplied +5/-5 outputs. It's easy, you just add a
tank capacitor power inverter, and you've got -5 V. All in one package.
For instance, look at:
RSS Feed