headers
matcheicyfriends | 11 Oct 2008 13:20
Picon
Favicon

I wanna get to know you!

You're really cute. I wanna get to know you. Here's my profile with many photos Reach me here. 
http://jyutegh.bravehost.com/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
matchbvkfriends | 12 Oct 2008 07:24
Picon
Favicon

Do u think this picture is funny?

LOL, I found a very funny picture and wanna know your opinion. Do u think this picture is funny? Check the
funny picture here:
http://www.funnysebird.0fees.net/funny.htm
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
nffsazdse | 19 Oct 2008 19:14
Picon
Favicon

You have received an important Message!

You have received an important Message! Check it here:
http://mclarensh.zoomshare.com/files/kenny.htm
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bjarne Bäckström | 30 Oct 2008 11:07
Picon

Which netatalk?

Hi,

    I've installed 4.0 on a LCIII machine, that is primarily intended  
to work as a "bridge" for Appletalking between old and new Macs. I  
had netatalk-asun running fine under NetBSD 2.1. Is it still possible  
to use that one, or should I compile one from pkgsrc? If the latter,  
which one would you recommend?
--

-- 
/Bjarne.
Permalink | Reply | 7 comments |
headers
Hauke Fath | 30 Oct 2008 20:33
Picon

Re: Which netatalk?

At 11:07 Uhr +0100 30.10.2008, Bjarne Bäckström wrote:
>    I've installed 4.0 on a LCIII machine, that is primarily intended
>to work as a "bridge" for Appletalking between old and new Macs. I
>had netatalk-asun running fine under NetBSD 2.1. Is it still possible
>to use that one, or should I compile one from pkgsrc? If the latter,
>which one would you recommend?

Provided you have the necessary COMPAT* options in your kernel's config,
the old netatalk binaries should run just fine.

OTOH, since you want to support newer Macs, give netatalk 2.x (that's
net/netatalk) a try. Works like a charm here for both System 7 Macs and OS
X 10.4 Powerbooks.

	hauke

--
"It's never straight up and down"     (DEVO)
Permalink | Reply | 6 comments |
headers
Bjarne Bäckström | 31 Oct 2008 07:15
Picon

Re: Which netatalk?


30 okt 2008 kl. 20.33 skrev Hauke Fath:

> Provided you have the necessary COMPAT* options in your kernel's  
> config,
> the old netatalk binaries should run just fine.
>
> OTOH, since you want to support newer Macs, give netatalk 2.x (that's
> net/netatalk) a try. Works like a charm here for both System 7 Macs  
> and OS
> X 10.4 Powerbooks.

Thanks!

    The -asun version did work flawlessly with "everything" up to and  
including OS X 10.4, too. I'll try that one first, since it seems  
that building netatalk 2.x will take more disk space than I currently  
have on the LCIII.
--

-- 
/Bjarne.
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Bjarne Bäckström | 31 Oct 2008 13:42
Picon

Re: Which netatalk?


31 okt 2008 kl. 07.15 skrev Bjarne Bäckström:

>    The -asun version did work flawlessly with "everything" up to  
> and including OS X 10.4, too. I'll try that one first,

    Yep, netatalk-asun-2.1.3nb6 (that I happened to have a copy of)  
works fine with NetBSD 4.0 GENERICSBC.
--

-- 
/Bjarne.
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |

Gmane