21 Aug 2007 22:49
26 Aug 2007 03:12
SCSI/IDE laptop adapters
der Mouse <mouse <at> Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
2007-08-26 01:12:40 GMT
2007-08-26 01:12:40 GMT
(I'm sending this to five lists, the five lists that I think most likely to have an interest in such a thing - ie, the ones most likely to be using machines built during the era when SCSI laptop disks were popular enough to be used. Since followup discussion on some lists is likely to go in directions not appropriate for other lists, I've set a Reply-To: address which is a bitbucket; please fix it if/when you reply, to send to just the list appropriate for your reply.) I have a SPARCstation Voyager, which unfortunately has a fairly small disk (773 MB). But this machine uses SCSI disks and has space for only a laptop-form-factor drive (well, unless you want to go external, which is rather suboptimal). I understand there are other machines in the same boat, such as some Mac laptops (I don't know whether they're PowerPC or 68k - or perhaps some of each - which is why I'm sending to both the macppc and mac68k NetBSD lists.) I did some searching and found there was a company that made an adapter that fit next to a modern (thin) laptop drive, so the result was a somewhat thickish "disk" that still fit within the old laptop form factor - but which spoke SCSI to the host even though the disk was IDE. Most of them were fairly expensive, but there was one that looked reasonable. The vendor that was said to carry it, though, no longer does (I phoned them and asked), so I wrote to the manufacturer. They offer to sell them to me at US$65 apiece, quantity 10. I'm willing to pay that rate, but I have no need for more than maybe two. So I'm wondering if people would be interested in buying these off me (at my cost, which probably means about USD 70 including shipping, at least within US48+CA).(Continue reading)
27 Aug 2007 16:00
Re: [rescue] SCSI/IDE laptop adapters
Sridhar Ayengar <ploopster <at> gmail.com>
2007-08-27 14:00:24 GMT
2007-08-27 14:00:24 GMT
der Mouse wrote: > I have a SPARCstation Voyager, which unfortunately has a fairly small > disk (773 MB). But this machine uses SCSI disks and has space for only > a laptop-form-factor drive (well, unless you want to go external, which > is rather suboptimal). I understand there are other machines in the > same boat, such as some Mac laptops (I don't know whether they're > PowerPC or 68k - or perhaps some of each - which is why I'm sending to > both the macppc and mac68k NetBSD lists.) Have you considered trying one of those newfangled 2.5" SCSI RAID array drives? There aren't that many around that are straight SCSI, since most are SAS, but you should be able to find some, and they should be more than big enough. Peace... Sridhar
27 Aug 2007 17:12
Re: [rescue] SCSI/IDE laptop adapters
Jim MacKenzie <jim <at> photojim.ca>
2007-08-27 15:12:45 GMT
2007-08-27 15:12:45 GMT
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sridhar Ayengar" <ploopster <at> gmail.com> To: "The Rescue List" <rescue <at> sunhelp.org> Cc: <cctalk <at> classiccmp.org>; <port-mac68k <at> netbsd.org>; <port-macppc <at> netbsd.org>; <port-sparc <at> netbsd.org> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:00 AM Subject: Re: [rescue] SCSI/IDE laptop adapters > Have you considered trying one of those newfangled 2.5" SCSI RAID array > drives? There aren't that many around that are straight SCSI, since most > are SAS, but you should be able to find some, and they should be more than > big enough. Another option (if slightly suboptimal as well)... network storage and booting? These machines aren't that fast to begin with, so using network booting shouldn't be that awful. Jim
29 Aug 2007 10:07
Documentation for graphics cards
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84 <at> gmail.com>
2007-08-29 08:07:30 GMT
2007-08-29 08:07:30 GMT
Hello, I'm currently trying to improve the framebuffer used in port-mac68k to bring it into the current century (i.e. full wscons support and drop rcons). I already have it mostly working using genfb (thanks, macallan <at> !), but it'd be nice to improve it some more by using device- specific functionality. Otherwise, colors do not appear correctly, for example. So... as the Mac I have claims to have a "valkyrie video card" (that is, the one I can try), does anyone know if there is/have any documentation for it? Do you have any documentation for any of the other supported video cards? Thanks! -- -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84 <at> gmail.com>
29 Aug 2007 12:07
Re: Documentation for graphics cards
<mngrif <at> gmail.com>
2007-08-29 10:07:39 GMT
2007-08-29 10:07:39 GMT
I don't know a thing about that specific card, or much of any of the video cards out there for macs of the era, but I do have a few various ones laying around that I will be *glad* to donate to the cause. wscons would be *amazing* to have finally, not to mention a real color X server! If there is any way I can help, please let me know. On 8/29/07, Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84 <at> gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm currently trying to improve the framebuffer used in port-mac68k > to bring it into the current century (i.e. full wscons support and > drop rcons). I already have it mostly working using genfb (thanks, > macallan <at> !), but it'd be nice to improve it some more by using device- > specific functionality. Otherwise, colors do not appear correctly, > for example. > > So... as the Mac I have claims to have a "valkyrie video card" (that > is, the one I can try), does anyone know if there is/have any > documentation for it? Do you have any documentation for any of the > other supported video cards? > > Thanks! > > -- > Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84 <at> gmail.com> > > >(Continue reading)
29 Aug 2007 13:21
Re: Documentation for graphics cards
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84 <at> gmail.com>
2007-08-29 11:21:31 GMT
2007-08-29 11:21:31 GMT
On Aug 29, 2007, at 12:07 PM, mngrif <at> gmail.com wrote: > I don't know a thing about that specific card, or much of any of the > video cards out there for macs of the era, but I do have a few various > ones laying around that I will be *glad* to donate to the cause. > wscons would be *amazing* to have finally, not to mention a real color > X server! If I'm successful with this card, we can look at these other cards laterBut first I must get one to work. > If there is any way I can help, please let me know. Well, I'd certainly welcome a full-features 68040 chip (or two) -- that is, with a built-in FPU. The ones I have are 68LC040 and they are slow as molasses. Plus some extra RAM for a Performa 475 (80 ns, 72 pin SIMM) could be helpful too. Anyone?
Kind regards, -- -- Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84 <at> gmail.com>
29 Aug 2007 14:23
Re: Documentation for graphics cards
Michael R. Zucca <mzucca <at> verizon.net>
2007-08-29 12:23:52 GMT
2007-08-29 12:23:52 GMT
>From: "Julio M. Merino Vidal" <jmmv84 <at> gmail.com> >Date: 2007/08/29 Wed AM 03:07:30 CDT >To: port-mac68k <at> NetBSD.org >Subject: Documentation for graphics cards >Hello, > >I'm currently trying to improve the framebuffer used in port-mac68k >to bring it into the current century (i.e. full wscons support and >drop rcons). I already have it mostly working using genfb (thanks, >macallan <at> !), but it'd be nice to improve it some more by using device- >specific functionality. Otherwise, colors do not appear correctly, >for example. > >So... as the Mac I have claims to have a "valkyrie video card" (that >is, the one I can try), does anyone know if there is/have any >documentation for it? Do you have any documentation for any of the >other supported video cards? I used to work on this but I could never quite get enough time and motivation to finish the job. However, I can give you some tips. You're in luck if you want to work on the Valkyrie since there used to be some code to support it on the PowerPC based 6300 in mklinux. I don't think there were any HW accelerated ops supported but there was code that enabled use of the CLUT/DAC, get the attached monitor type, and, I think, change the color depth mode. So your best bet to get Valkyrie support going is to grab an old copy of the mklinux sources for the old PPC macs.(Continue reading)
29 Aug 2007 15:13
Re: Documentation for graphics cards
Michael Lorenz <macallan <at> netbsd.org>
2007-08-29 13:13:50 GMT
2007-08-29 13:13:50 GMT
Hello, On Aug 29, 2007, at 08:23, Michael R. Zucca wrote: > You're in luck if you want to work on the Valkyrie since there used to > be > some code to support it on the PowerPC based 6300 in mklinux. I don't > think > there were any HW accelerated ops supported but there was code that > enabled > use of the CLUT/DAC, get the attached monitor type, and, I think, > change the > color depth mode. There's a valkyrie driver in the current linux kernel, no need to go digging: http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/drivers/video/valkyriefb.c?v=linux-2.6 have fun Michael
29 Aug 2007 16:03
color X
Tim & Alethea Larson <thelarsons3 <at> cox.net>
2007-08-29 14:03:16 GMT
2007-08-29 14:03:16 GMT
mngrif <at> gmail.com wrote: > I don't know a thing about that specific card, or much of any of the > video cards out there for macs of the era, but I do have a few various > ones laying around that I will be *glad* to donate to the cause. > wscons would be *amazing* to have finally, not to mention a real color > X server! I'd be happy with even a 4-bit X server that worked consistently on all mac68k, as long as it was BSD licensed so it could be distributed. The present situation is kind of sad. Tim -- -- Tim & Alethea christtrek.org
But first I must get one to work.
> If there is any way I can help, please let me know.
Well, I'd certainly welcome a full-features 68040 chip (or two) --
that is, with a built-in FPU. The ones I have are 68LC040 and they
are slow as molasses. Plus some extra RAM for a Performa 475 (80 ns,
72 pin SIMM) could be helpful too. Anyone?
RSS Feed