headers
John Klos | 2 Aug 2004 00:24

Out of address space?

This is interesting:

Starting BIND 9: panic: enter: out of address space
Stopped in pid 213.1 (named) at netbsd:cpu_Debugger+0x6:  unlk a6
db> tr
cpu_Debugger(ffffffff,0,55b000,5216d98,1e1d86) + 6
panic(21dd06,19,1,0,3826000) + f8
pmap_enter_ptpage(87f06c,e000000) + 29e
pmap_enter(87f06c,e000000,3826000,3,22) + 52
uvm_fault(87e2b8,e000000,0,2) + 662
trap(8,481,e00005c) + 328
faultstkadj() + 0

I'm completely lost. Anyone have a clue?

System: Quadra 605, 68 megs, real '040, NetBSD 2.0 from releng as of 
27-July, BIND 9 compiled from pkgsrc on NetBSD 1.6 (from before the 2.0 
upgrade).

Thanks,
John Klos
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
John Klos | 2 Aug 2004 01:01

Softfloat file availability on Monday

Hi,

The softfloat NetBSD sets and binary packages will be unavailable during 
part of Monday due to server upgrades, but will be back later Monday 
evening.

Thanks,
John Klos
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Damiano Giorgi | 2 Aug 2004 12:16
Picon

Re: [Slightly OT] Router advice

Joel Rees wrote:

> Under PPPoA, the default setup is likely to be to assign everything on 
> the LAN side local range addresses (may be DHCP or static, depending on 
> the DSL modem/router and your setup).
> 
> So what you'd have on the LC475/NetBSD router would probably not be a 
> global IP and local alias, but a local range IP and local range alias 
> on a different subnet. (Note that the DSL modem/router has a LAN-side 
> address in addition to the WAN-side address.)

Or maybe an alias on a different network, eg. 192.168.1.1 for the 
"internal" side of the 475. Wouldn't that be easier?
Anyway, in my example I was assuming a simple DSL modem, not a modem/
router. If I decide to go for the modem/router solution, which I think I 
will, I don't think I'm going to place another router further downstream -- 
would be fun, but not worth the effort for a 2-machine network ;-)

Thanks!

Damiano Giorgi
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Joe Laffey | 2 Aug 2004 14:14

PB520C

Anyone know the current status of the PB 520c? It has a 68040LC.

I found a lot of old posts regarding it, but nothing recent. Is the FPU
emulation bug fixed, or is it still around?

Thanks,

--
Joe Laffey                |        Visual Effects for Film and Video
LAFFEY Computer Imaging   |        ---------------------------------
St. Louis, MO             |        Show Reel at http://LAFFEY.tv/?s
USA                       |        ---------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mail here will be rejected --> "Sigfried Trap" <s_trap <at> laffeycomputer.com>
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Cameron Kaiser | 2 Aug 2004 15:39
Favicon

Re: PB520C

> Anyone know the current status of the PB 520c? It has a 68040LC.
> I found a lot of old posts regarding it, but nothing recent. Is the FPU
> emulation bug fixed, or is it still around?

Bruce ONeel's -msoft-float set should work on the 520c (it's known to
work on the 540c, and in fact I'm going to install it on my 540c this
weekend). I forget the URL, but I'm sure he'll be happy to post it ^^

--

-- 
---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
 Cameron Kaiser, Floodgap Systems Ltd * So. Calif., USA * ckaiser <at> floodgap.com
-- "I'd love to go out with you, but the doorjambs need dusting." -------------
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Joe Milbourn | 2 Aug 2004 23:05
Picon
Favicon

Re: Pb520C

Once upon a time, Joe Laffey said:
> Anyone know the current status of the PB 520c? It has a 68040LC.

I've got an older version of Bruce O'Neel's soft-float packages -- 
version 1.5.something -- working on a 520c.  I can dig it out if you need
more information.

Cheers,
Joe
--

-- 
Procrastination means never having to say you're sorry.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Joel Rees | 3 Aug 2004 00:15
Picon
Favicon

Re: PB520C


>> Anyone know the current status of the PB 520c? It has a 68040LC.
>> I found a lot of old posts regarding it, but nothing recent. Is the 
>> FPU
>> emulation bug fixed, or is it still around?
>
> Bruce ONeel's -msoft-float set should work on the 520c (it's known to
> work on the 540c, and in fact I'm going to install it on my 540c this
> weekend). I forget the URL, but I'm sure he'll be happy to post it ^^

It's in the archives. Look for threads involving Bruce ONeel and Julio 
M. Merino Vidal.

(And I'm looking forward to giving the latest one a try on my two 
Performas.)

--
Joel Rees
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bruce ONeel | 3 Aug 2004 17:52
Picon
Favicon

Re: PB520C

Hi,

While I've not loaded the 2.0 beta on a 520c, I have loaded
past versions on the 520 and they have worked fine.  The  only 
difference is that the 520 is slower.

You can get things starting at lain.ziaspace.com/pub/NetBSD/m68k
and chosing from there via ftp.

Cheers and good luck!

bruce  
Cameron Kaiser <spectre <at> floodgap.com> wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 06:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre <at> floodgap.com>
> Subject: Re: PB520C
> To: joe <at> laffeycomputer.com (Joe Laffey)
> Cc: port-mac68k <at> NetBSD.org
> content-length: 642
> 
> > Anyone know the current status of the PB 520c? It has a 68040LC.
> > I found a lot of old posts regarding it, but nothing recent. Is the FPU
> > emulation bug fixed, or is it still around?
> 
> Bruce ONeel's -msoft-float set should work on the 520c (it's known to
> work on the 540c, and in fact I'm going to install it on my 540c this
> weekend). I forget the URL, but I'm sure he'll be happy to post it ^^
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bruce O'Neel | 5 Aug 2004 10:31
Picon
Favicon

Softfloat build from 30 July

Hi,

Sorry for the delay, but, the softfloat build from the 30 July tar
files for release 2.0 is up at

ftp://lain.ziaspace.com/pub/NetBSD/m68k/NetBSD-release-2.0-mac-softfloat/mac68k_softfloat/

Thanks to John Klos for disk space, CPU, and bandwidth for this.

cheers

bruce

--

-- 
edoneel <at> sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Michael G. Schabert | 5 Aug 2004 23:28
Picon

Re: [Slightly OT] Router advice

>Wow, I'm getting more help than I deserved, given the OT :-)
>
>Michael wrote:
>
>>  You don't need aliases or anything - I did exactly this for ages with a
>>  little Sun ( running Solaris though ) with only one network interface,
>>  the DSL modem plugged into the switch
>                                  ******
>
>OK, let's see if I got it right. Hey, I'm a newbie, please bear with me if
>I'm talking nonsense!
>This is what I wanted to do:
>
>                          +---+
>|       _________        |   |
>|>-----|DSL modem|-------| H |--------> L  [192.168.0.2 etc.]
>|      |_________|   ____| U |--------> A
>                     |    | B |--------> N
>                     |    |   |
>                     |    +---+
>                     |
>          1.2.3.4    |  192.168.0.1
>          ["real"] \ | /[alias]
>               +----ae0----+
>               |           |
>               |   NetBSD  |
>               |   router  |
>               +-----------+
>
>Would the above work? Do I need a switch instead of a hub?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane