16 Jun 2005 16:19
16 Jun 2005 19:13
Re: NetBSD 2.0.2
John Klos <john <at> ziaspace.com>
2005-06-16 17:13:35 GMT
2005-06-16 17:13:35 GMT
Hello, > I am considering to install the latest NetBSD 2 on my 3000. Is an upgrade > from 1.6.x supported, and there any issues I should be aware of? I'm not sure it was fixed, but in NetBSD 2.0, there was a memory leak in the kernel - it would, over time, just consume more and more memory until the system panics. The speed depends on how much you do with your machine. It wouldn't be bad to test with a local machine to see if the problem could be pinpointed. John Klos
16 Jun 2005 19:41
Re: NetBSD 2.0.2
Bernd Sieker <bsieker <at> rvs.uni-bielefeld.de>
2005-06-16 17:41:40 GMT
2005-06-16 17:41:40 GMT
On 16.06.05, 15:19:12, Lars Hecking wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am considering to install the latest NetBSD 2 on my 3000. Is an upgrade > from 1.6.x supported, and there any issues I should be aware of? Yes, upgrading from 1.6 is supported, it was the previous major release. Upgrading from 1.5 (and possibly 1.4) shouldn't be a big problem either. The configuration files in /etc/ will probably have changed quite a bit, see etcupdate(8) and be prepared to adjust some configurations manually. > > Thanks. > -- -- Bernd Sieker NetBSD: Making your net work, and its free to boot! -- Steve Woodford
24 Jun 2005 17:58
Re: NetBSD 2.0.2
Lars Hecking <lhecking <at> users.sourceforge.net>
2005-06-24 15:58:13 GMT
2005-06-24 15:58:13 GMT
Lars Hecking writes: > > Hi all, > > I am considering to install the latest NetBSD 2 on my 3000. Is an upgrade > from 1.6.x supported, and there any issues I should be aware of? Looks like I have to shelve that plan ... I tried a miniroot install on a seperate drive, and the installer dumped me straight into the kernel (?) debugger. Wasn't there at one time an installation method via install kernel and loadbsd?
24 Jun 2005 20:35
Re: NetBSD 2.0.2
Ignatios Souvatzis <is <at> netbsd.org>
2005-06-24 18:35:34 GMT
2005-06-24 18:35:34 GMT
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 04:58:13PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote: > Lars Hecking writes: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I am considering to install the latest NetBSD 2 on my 3000. Is an upgrade > > from 1.6.x supported, and there any issues I should be aware of? > > Looks like I have to shelve that plan ... I tried a miniroot install on > a seperate drive, and the installer dumped me straight into the kernel (?) > debugger. "db>" ? Please report what the "trace" command tells. Regards, /is -- -- seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/
25 Jun 2005 01:02
Installing NetBSD 2.0 on A1200 -> panic: MMU fault
Antony Akintewe <tony72 <at> gmail.com>
2005-06-24 23:02:06 GMT
2005-06-24 23:02:06 GMT
Hi all, I'm trying to install NetBSD 2.0 on my A1200 (KS3.0, Blizzard 1230/50 accelerator (50MHz 68030 with MMU), 64MB fast mem, 4.3GB HD). I partitioned the drive as per the install notes, and succesfully copied the miniroot filesystem to the swap partition. The miniroot filesystem starts to boot ok, then I get the following: ... root file system type: ext2fs uvm_fault (0x2142b8,0x0,0,0x1) -> 0xe trap type 8, code = 402076d, v=0 pid=1,lid=1,pc=000A71A0,ps=2004,sfc=1,dfc=1 <register contents> <kernel stack> panic: MMU fault stopped in pid 1.1 (init) at netbsd:cpu_Debugger+0x6: unlk a6 Does anyone have any idea what the problem might be? The MMU works well enough to run VMM in AmigaOS, and Debian runs ok, so I kind of assume it isn't actually indicative of a faulty MMU. BTW I'm completely new to NetBSD, so any instructions in longhand if possible please :). Tony
25 Jun 2005 10:15
Re: Installing NetBSD 2.0 on A1200 -> panic: MMU fault
Ignatios Souvatzis <is <at> netbsd.org>
2005-06-25 08:15:33 GMT
2005-06-25 08:15:33 GMT
Hi, On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:02:06AM +0100, Antony Akintewe wrote: > the miniroot filesystem to the swap partition. The miniroot filesystem > starts to boot ok, then I get the following: > > ... > root file system type: ext2fs This sounds very wrong. Can you please report _exactly_ what you typed to boot, and how you partitioned the disk? Regards, -is
25 Jun 2005 15:21
Re: Installing NetBSD 2.0 on A1200 -> panic: MMU fault
Antony Akintewe <tony72 <at> gmail.com>
2005-06-25 13:21:21 GMT
2005-06-25 13:21:21 GMT
On 6/25/05, Ignatios Souvatzis <is <at> netbsd.org> wrote: [...] > This sounds very wrong. Can you please report _exactly_ what you typed > to boot, and how you partitioned the disk? > Thanks for replying. Sure - I initially went with the default boot line "netbsd -ASn2", then I tried -AS and -A (if I read the notes right I shouldn't need the -n2 option) with the same result. I've taken screengrabs of the hard disk partition details to avoid the risk of typos, five 7kb png images, at the url below. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/channel0/screens/screens.htm In case you can't get to that, hopefully this is all the relevant info in text: Name DosType FS Size Automnt Custom Boot Code DH0 0x444f5303 FFS 100MB yes no DH1 0x444f5303 FFS 1002MB yes no root 0x4e425207 Custom 128MB yes yes, 16 blocks swap 0x4e425301 Custom 128MB yes yes, 16 blocks var 0x4e425507 Custom 64MB no no usr 0x4e425507 Custom 2701MB no no I followed the install notes to the letter as far as creating the partitions with HDToolBox, except for increasing the partition sizes, as far as I can tell, but maybe I missed something. Cheers. Tony(Continue reading)
25 Jun 2005 20:05
Re: Installing NetBSD 2.0 on A1200 -> panic: MMU fault
Ignatios Souvatzis <is <at> netbsd.org>
2005-06-25 18:05:52 GMT
2005-06-25 18:05:52 GMT
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:02:06AM +0100, Antony Akintewe wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to install NetBSD 2.0 on my A1200 (KS3.0, Blizzard 1230/50 > accelerator (50MHz 68030 with MMU), 64MB fast mem, 4.3GB HD). I > partitioned the drive as per the install notes, and succesfully copied > the miniroot filesystem to the swap partition. The miniroot filesystem > starts to boot ok, then I get the following: > > ... > root file system type: ext2fs > uvm_fault (0x2142b8,0x0,0,0x1) -> 0xe > trap type 8, code = 402076d, v=0 > pid=1,lid=1,pc=000A71A0,ps=2004,sfc=1,dfc=1 > <register contents> > <kernel stack> > panic: MMU fault > stopped in pid 1.1 (init) at netbsd:cpu_Debugger+0x6: unlk a6 What does the trace command (at the db> prompt) show? Regards, -is
25 Jun 2005 21:54
Re: Installing NetBSD 2.0 on A1200 -> panic: MMU fault
Antony Akintewe <tony72 <at> gmail.com>
2005-06-25 19:54:28 GMT
2005-06-25 19:54:28 GMT
On 6/25/05, Ignatios Souvatzis <is <at> netbsd.org> wrote: [...] > What does the trace command (at the db> prompt) show? > Here's the trace output: ______________________________________________________ trace cpu_Debugger(8,1,e68b2,3859b08,1a8576) + 6 panic(1ef60c,8,3859b98,1a88e2,8) + a8 panictrap(8,402076d,0,3859c20) + 6c trapmmufault(8,402076d,0,3859c20,411a000) + 32a trap(8,402076d,0) + 398 ext2fs_inactive(3059cec,1d90e8,41242a0,385a000,413000) + 3c VOP_INACTIVE(41242a0,385a000,16,413000,3859d50) + 2c vput(41242a0,2,1ae86,1000,a8) + cc ext2fs_vget(3f0000,1ae86,3859dc4) + 152 ext2fs_lookup(3859dd8,1d8c2c,4124150,3859e94,3859ea8) + 6d2 VOP_LOOKUP(4124150,3859e94,3859ea8) + 32 lookup(3859e84) + 260 namei(3859e84) + 156 check_console(385a000,0,0,0,1b95b8) + 30 start_init(411a000) + 5a proc_trampoline() + 2 ______________________________________________________ Tony
RSS Feed