9 Nov 2008 11:49
Re: btnetbsd ...
Reinoud Zandijk <reinoud <at> 13thmonkey.org>
2008-11-09 10:49:31 GMT
2008-11-09 10:49:31 GMT
Hiya Niel, On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 07:33:51PM +0100, Niel Drummond wrote: > >>Used 261120 kb DRAM at 0xc0000000 for video memory > >>Found ROM (0) at 0xa0000000 for 4096 k > >>Found I/O (0) at 0x00000000 for 28224 k > >>Found I/O (0) at 0x90000000 for 64 k > >>Found I/O (0) at 0xa3000000 for 4096 k > >>Found I/O (0) at 0xa8000000 for 65536 k > >>Found DRAM (0) at 0xcff00000 for 1024 k > >> > > > >This is what i meant! 261 MB (!) for video memory? sure thats the cause > >that something goes horribly wrong... it only finds ONE MB of RAM wich is > >... rather poor :-D ... > Some of these bars I seem to be able to adjust, but whenever I run the > bootloader it resets "Screen memory" to 0. This morning it struck me that what it reports is correct! It *does* have that amount of video memory available (aprox.) ONLY its part of PCI card's and not part of the main memory and thus the assertion that if there is no VRAM its part of DRAM0 is false. Either the memory and I/O extents enumeration needs to be thought about PCI extents (PRM!) or the presence of a PCI SWI needs to be checked (using OS_SWINumberFromString) and if its there, then set a flag to indicate VRAM is NOT part of main memory. Has Iyonix now support for its video now etc? the TODO is quite old and(Continue reading)
RSS Feed