mk/bsd.pkg.mk change request

Hi,

I don't know if it is a good time to tell you about this, but I think, that
this patch:

[-wip list: please apply it before trying any of mingw32-* packages]

diff -u -r1.1307 bsd.pkg.mk
--- bsd.pkg.mk  2003/11/27 13:02:38     1.1307
+++ bsd.pkg.mk  2003/12/01 06:30:11
 <at>  <at>  -371,8 +371,8  <at>  <at> 
 .else
 LIBTOOL_REQD?=         1.4.20010614nb11
 .endif
-LIBTOOL=               ${LOCALBASE}/bin/libtool
-SHLIBTOOL=             ${LOCALBASE}/bin/shlibtool
+LIBTOOL?=              ${LOCALBASE}/bin/libtool
+SHLIBTOOL?=            ${LOCALBASE}/bin/shlibtool
 .if defined(USE_LIBTOOL)
 PKGLIBTOOL=            ${LIBTOOL}
 PKGSHLIBTOOL=          ${SHLIBTOOL}

... could be really useful for the project I've just started (packages for
cross-compiling win32 binaries on unices with mingw32.sf.net compiler).

If I can't override libtool, there's no way I can create packages in an easy
way.

Any chances this gets through?

USE_GNU_TOOLS broken for GNU tools

I ran into this when rebuilding my box  <at>  work with fresh pkgsrc.

lang/gawk/Makefile:

	USE_GMAKE=              # defined

but tools.mk currently disables USE_GNU_TOOLS for all GNU tools
supported by it, losing the gawk build (probably not noticed before
because people are likely to have gmake already installed).

	+ cd /tmp/pkgsrc/lang/gawk/work.desk06/gawk-3.1.3
	+ ... /home/jonp/pkg/bin/gmake -f Makefile all
	/usr/bin/env: No such file or directory
	*** Error code 127

	/home/jonp/pkg/bin/gmake: No such file or directory

The attached patch fixes the problem, but I'd like some comments
in case I missed something obvious.

Thanks,

--

-- 
Jonathan Perkin                         <jonathan <at> perkin.org.uk>
BBC Internet Services         http://www.perkin.org.uk/jonathan/

Index: tools.mk
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/mk/tools.mk,v

Subversion Upgrade (was Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel)

Bang Jun-Young <junyoung <at> netbsd.org> writes:

> Log Message:
> Update subversion to 0.32.1.

Why?  0.33.1 is out and already packaged on my systems, along
with the Perl binding and SVN::Web.  I have not committed it
because pkgsrc is frozen.

As i have stated in the past, i am a heavy Subversion user and
always keep my packages up to date.  If i have not committed an
update, i have a good reason for it.

--  
Eric Gillespie <*> epg <at> pretzelnet.org

Re: Subversion Upgrade (was Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel)

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:31:42AM -0500, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> Bang Jun-Young <junyoung <at> netbsd.org> writes:
> 
> > Log Message:
> > Update subversion to 0.32.1.
> 
> Why?  0.33.1 is out and already packaged on my systems, along
> with the Perl binding and SVN::Web.  I have not committed it
> because pkgsrc is frozen.
> 
> As i have stated in the past, i am a heavy Subversion user and
> always keep my packages up to date.  If i have not committed an
> update, i have a good reason for it.

I posted the patch on tech-pkg <at>  and waited for a day, but nobody
gave me comments on it. So I committed it. 

Anyway, since we have everything in the CVS, you can always back
out the changes I made, or update it to the latest one you have.

Jun-Young

--

-- 
Bang Jun-Young <junyoung <at> NetBSD.org>

Re: Subversion Upgrade (was Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel)

Bang Jun-Young <junyoung <at> netbsd.org> writes:

> I posted the patch on tech-pkg <at>  and waited for a day, but
> nobody gave me comments on it. So I committed it.

Here in the US many of us were off due to Thanksgiving holiday.
I stay away from my computer systems then.

> Anyway, since we have everything in the CVS, you can always
> back out the changes I made, or update it to the latest one you
> have.

There is no point in backing it out; it's better than what was
there before your update.  As for committing my stuff, pkgsrc is
still frozen.

--  
Eric Gillespie <*> epg <at> pretzelnet.org

Re: bump BUILDLINK_DEPENDS.tiff and pkg/23515: graphics/tiff is broken under amd64

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:

> > I will provide my new tiff-3.6.0 package soon so it can be tested.
>
> It is at
> http://www.reedmedia.net/misc/netbsd/packages/tiff-for-pkgsrc.tgz (7106 bytes)

Has anyone tested this? (A couple people have tested for me and I tested
on a couple machines.)

Can I import to pkgsrc?

Can someone provide a list of all the Makefiles and buildlink2.mk files
that should be bumped (to compare with my long list of over 500 files)?
(Or can someone do this?)

   Jeremy C. Reed
   http://bsd.reedmedia.net/

kdeutils3

Can someout out there with a multiproc box running NetBSD-current
test out the attached patch for pkgsrc/misc/kdeutils3?

 # cd pkgsrc/misc/kdeutils3/ && patch < kdeutils-3.1.4.diff
 # make install
 # ksim

Ron

Index: distinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/NetBSD/pkgsrc/misc/kdeutils3/distinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -B -p -u -r1.16 distinfo
--- distinfo	17 Sep 2003 23:41:36 -0000	1.16
+++ distinfo	1 Dec 2003 19:52:21 -0000
 <at>  <at>  -14,4 +14,4  <at>  <at>  SHA1 (patch-ak) = a910a9440175c9772c3932
 SHA1 (patch-am) = 1f9931d683654159686151206db4c628253e875e
 SHA1 (patch-an) = ecc14037fad569dc0627c980537bbfa03e4f820c
 SHA1 (patch-ao) = c68f205ab70cd6a5331c052b234c3fe7fb0ad411
-SHA1 (patch-ap) = 7938c4a33fa178740b0d2f704f4aab1b693ee112
+SHA1 (patch-ap) = 18cbffca37808ddf194767b5bd252e41a7c80089
Index: patches/patch-ap
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/NetBSD/pkgsrc/misc/kdeutils3/patches/patch-ap,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -B -p -u -r1.1 patch-ap
--- patches/patch-ap	11 Mar 2003 13:22:32 -0000	1.1
+++ patches/patch-ap	1 Dec 2003 19:52:09 -0000

Re: kdeutils3

* On 2003-12-01 at 20:29 GMT, Ron Roskens wrote:

> Can someout out there with a multiproc box running NetBSD-current
> test out the attached patch for pkgsrc/misc/kdeutils3?

> ++#include <malloc.h>

Use stdlib.h instead.

--

-- 
Jonathan Perkin                         <jonathan <at> perkin.org.uk>
BBC Internet Services         http://www.perkin.org.uk/jonathan/

erlang package, Solaris

I'm trying to build the package for Erlang R9C-0 in 
pkgsrc/lang/erlang, CVS of a couple weeks ago, on
i386 Solaris 8,which is
  MACHINE_PLATFORM=SunOS-5.8-i386

The Ericsson source kit has dependencies on

jdk     (version >= 1.2)
openssl (version >= 0.9.7)
tcl     (version >= 8.2)

The server in quesion has Sun's jdk (1.3.1_07) in /usr/java.

I have verified that the source kit builds correctly on this platform
outside pkgsrc, but would prefer integration with pkgsrc.

I think there is a bug in pkgsrc/mk/java-vm.mk, because, despite
setting

   PKG_JVM_DEFAULT=sun-jdk13

   in /etc/mk.conf, pkgsrc wants to build wonka. But, I could be
   wrong. One work-around is to edit /usr/pkgsrc/mk/java-vm.mk thus:

--- java-vm.mk.orig     2003-10-03 11:38:22.000000000 -0500
+++ java-vm.mk  2003-12-01 15:30:01.849334000 -0600
 <at>  <at>  -90,7 +90,7  <at>  <at> 
        NetBSD-*-arm Linux-*-arm
 .endif
 _ONLY_FOR_PLATFORMS.sun-jdk13= \

digest not installed with pkg_install

Hi,

I noticed that on a virgin 1.6.2rc3 system, digest doesn't get installed
with pkg_install. But any packages subsequent to pkg_install expect it and
fail while trying to run digest.

Does anyone care to fix this?

Thanks,
John Klos