Arne Babenhauserheide | 9 Nov 2008 11:26
Picon
Gravatar

Re: status

If Viengoos fullfills the hopes I have in it since I read the paper from Neal, 
then it's likely that the GNU/Hurd will be ported to it. 

In the meantime (the next few years at least I assume), the Hurd will use the 
gnumach kernel. 

If you're interested in Viengoos and porting the Hurd and stuff, please have a 
look at the hurd-l4 mailinglist: 

http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd

Best wishes, 
Arne
PS: Please reply onlist - there are far more knowledgeable people than me on 
the lists, and you miss the chance to get an answer from them. 

Am Sonntag 09 November 2008 07:09:56 schrieb Gnu Logic:
> Thanks Arne.  So Viengoos is the microkernel GNU/Hurd might use in the
> future not Coyotos?
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide 
<arne_bab <at> web.de>wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 November 2008 04:31:27 Gnu Logic wrote:
> > > could someone please enlighten me on the current status of the GNU/Hurd
> > > servers/kernel.  Are the developers still looking to replace the Mach
> > > kernel with the Coyotos microkernel?
> >
> > Currently they are first improving the Mach version, but Neal Walfield
> > works
> > on the Viengoos Microkernel, which should deliver some missing pieces and
(Continue reading)

Neal H. Walfield | 17 Nov 2008 10:25

Stakeholder-Directed Resource Allocation in Viengoos

Greetings,

The following paper, which I submitted to EuroSys 2009, describes how
resources are distributed in Viengoos, how per-process available is
computed and how applications can exploit this.  You can find a copy
here:

  http://walfield.org/papers/2009-walfield-viengoos-a-framework-for-stakeholder-directed-resource-allocation.pdf

Comments are welcome.

Neal


Gmane