9 Nov 2008 11:26
Re: status
Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab <at> web.de>
2008-11-09 10:26:24 GMT
2008-11-09 10:26:24 GMT
If Viengoos fullfills the hopes I have in it since I read the paper from Neal, then it's likely that the GNU/Hurd will be ported to it. In the meantime (the next few years at least I assume), the Hurd will use the gnumach kernel. If you're interested in Viengoos and porting the Hurd and stuff, please have a look at the hurd-l4 mailinglist: http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l4-hurd Best wishes, Arne PS: Please reply onlist - there are far more knowledgeable people than me on the lists, and you miss the chance to get an answer from them. Am Sonntag 09 November 2008 07:09:56 schrieb Gnu Logic: > Thanks Arne. So Viengoos is the microkernel GNU/Hurd might use in the > future not Coyotos? > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_bab <at> web.de>wrote: > > On Saturday 08 November 2008 04:31:27 Gnu Logic wrote: > > > could someone please enlighten me on the current status of the GNU/Hurd > > > servers/kernel. Are the developers still looking to replace the Mach > > > kernel with the Coyotos microkernel? > > > > Currently they are first improving the Mach version, but Neal Walfield > > works > > on the Viengoos Microkernel, which should deliver some missing pieces and(Continue reading)
RSS Feed