Marcos Biscaysaqu | 1 Sep 01:19 2003
Picon

kernel: wi0: timeout in wi_seek

Hi there .
Some one know how  fix this???
I tried a lot of diffierent thinks, but nothing. and my Freebsd Access 
point keep crashing some time when I use cards prism 2.5 , but dosen't 
crash with prism 2 . The problem is I must to use prims 2.5 because it's 
a high power card, and work really well until crash.
thanks!!

--

-- 

Marcos Biscaysaqu

Systems Administrator
ThePacific.Net Ltd.

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current <at> freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe <at> freebsd.org"

Malcolm Kay | 1 Sep 04:47 2003
Picon

Re: POSIX_C_SOURCE

On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 02:19, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> In article <20030830161813.GA28890 <at> twisted.net> you write:
> >Any chance that someone will finally commit the fixes to prevent the
> >POSIX_C_SOURCE warnings from showing up? I saw a number of posts on this
> >topic, but it still seems like it's not "officially committed"
> >
> >/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:273: warning: `_POSIX_C_SOURCE' is not defined
> >/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:279: warning: `_POSIX_C_SOURCE' is not defined
>
> The warnings are wrong,[1] so you should probably ask the GCC people
> about that.
>
> -GAWollman
>
> [1] That is to say, any identifier used in a preprocessor expression
> (after macro expansion) is defined to have a value of zero, and GCC
> should not be complaining about this.
>

The warnings are only wrong in your personal interpretation of right and 
wrong. Many gcc options generate warnings with legal C source and this is 
permitted by the C standard (whether or not it is controlled by a compiler 
option) provided it does not prevent generation of correct code.

The warning is true: that is _POSIX_C_SOURCE is not defined (and is evaluated
in an #if preprocessor statement).

The warning only appears when -Wundef option is used which relates 
specifically to this circumstance. GCC people surely cannot be criticised 
for an option that works precisely as documented.
(Continue reading)

Ruben van Staveren | 1 Sep 09:47 2003

Re: kernel: wi0: timeout in wi_seek

You are probably using WEP, and this causes lockups in the wi driver.
Use either ipsec/pptp, but encrypted pptp is marginally better that that
phoney WEP :)

Or get a hardware AP, like the linksys WAP11.

Wat version of FreeBSD are you running ? as you both mailed to -stable and
-current... searching the archives also helps

Cheers,
	Ruben

On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:19:28AM +1200, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
> Hi there .
> Some one know how  fix this???
> I tried a lot of diffierent thinks, but nothing. and my Freebsd Access 
> point keep crashing some time when I use cards prism 2.5 , but dosen't 
> crash with prism 2 . The problem is I must to use prims 2.5 because it's 
> a high power card, and work really well until crash.
> thanks!!
> 

--

-- 
   ,-_  .----------------------------------------------------------------.
  /() ) |       Ruben van Staveren      http://ruben.is.verweg.com/      |_o
 (__ (  |Men are from Mars. Women are from Venus. Computers are from hell| #>
=/  ()  `----------------------------------------------------------------' 4
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable <at> freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
(Continue reading)

Vlad Galu | 1 Sep 11:53 2003
Picon

source broken ?


	I've just cvsupped my RELENG_4 tree this morning, and this is what I get when I
do make depend after I configure my kernel:

mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I <at> 
-I <at> /../include -I/usr/include  /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_disk.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_pci.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_eisa.c/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../..
/dev/ida/ida.c:41: pci.h: No such file or directory

------
Vlad Galu
Network & Systems Administrator
Romania Data Systems NOC in Bucharest
Phone:	+40 21 30 10 850
Web:	http://www.rdsnet.ro
PGP:	http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x53ABCE97
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery
of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message
to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify
the sender by reply e-mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Miha Nedok | 1 Sep 14:44 2003
Picon

Re: spontaneous reboot


-STABLE name does *not* mean it is really stable. This was discused a
zillion years before. But run what you want to run.

-Mik3

On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Vitor de Matos Carvalho wrote:

> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 19:54:11 -0300
> From: Vitor de Matos Carvalho <listas <at> softinfo.com.br>
> To: Stable <FreeBSD-Stable <at> FreeBSD.ORG>
> Subject: Re: spontaneous reboot
>
>
> Sincerely, after this everything that happened I I do not RUN STABLE NEVER MORE. STABLE alone in the name,
because in the truth it does not pass of a version "Current-2".
> I changed all the servers in production for RELENG_4_8, this version yes that it is STABLE, therefore are
only patchs of bugs.
>
>  Regards,
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Vitor de Matos Carvalho - #5602098
> Softinfo Network Administrator
> Salvador - Bahia - Brazil
> FreeBSD: The silent Workhorse
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Miha Nedok" <mike <at> voyager.unix-systems.net>
> To: "T Kellers" <kellers <at> njit.edu>
> Cc: <stable <at> freebsd.org>
(Continue reading)

David Wolfskill | 1 Sep 16:02 2003

Apparent problem with ida(4); patch included

Someone else also reported seeing these symptoms with recently-updated
sources:

>>> Kernel build for FREEBEAST started on Mon Sep  1 05:25:41 PDT 2003
...
===> ida
 <at>  -> /usr/src/sys
machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include
perl  <at> /kern/makeops.pl -h  <at> /kern/device_if.m
perl  <at> /kern/makeops.pl -h  <at> /kern/bus_if.m
perl  <at> /kern/makeops.pl -h  <at> /pci/pci_if.m
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I <at>  -I <at> /../include
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include  /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_disk.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_pci.c /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_eisa.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida.c:41: pci.h: No such file or directory
mkdep: compile failed
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/ida.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBEAST.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
(Continue reading)

Kent Stewart | 1 Sep 16:23 2003

Re: source broken ?

On Monday 01 September 2003 02:53 am, Vlad Galu wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> 	I've just cvsupped my RELENG_4 tree this morning, and this is what I
> get when I do make depend after I configure my kernel:
>
> mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I <at> 
> - -I <at> /../include -I/usr/include 
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida.c
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_disk.c
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_pci.c
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_eisa.c/usr/src/sys/modules
>/ida/../.. /dev/ida/ida.c:41: pci.h: No such file or directory
>
>

If you cvsup, your are supposed to follow the buildworld, 
build[install]kernel, installworld sequence.

Kent

--

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html

_______________________________________________
(Continue reading)

Vlad Galu | 1 Sep 16:28 2003
Picon

Re: Apparent problem with ida(4); patch included


On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 07:02:41 -0700 (PDT) David Wolfskill <david <at> catwhisker.org>
wrote:

> Someone else also reported seeing these symptoms with recently-updated
> sources:
> 
> >>> Kernel build for FREEBEAST started on Mon Sep  1 05:25:41 PDT 2003
> ...
> ===> ida
>  <at>  -> /usr/src/sys
> machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include
> perl  <at> /kern/makeops.pl -h  <at> /kern/device_if.m
> perl  <at> /kern/makeops.pl -h  <at> /kern/bus_if.m
> perl  <at> /kern/makeops.pl -h  <at> /pci/pci_if.m
> rm -f .depend
> mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I <at> 
> -I <at> /../include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include 
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida.c
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_disk.c
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_pci.c
> /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_eisa.c/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../
> ../dev/ida/ida.c:41: pci.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/ida.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules.
> *** Error code 1
(Continue reading)

Mike Harding | 1 Sep 17:58 2003
Picon

Re: Apparent problem with ida(4); patch included


I'm seeing this too...

- Mike H.

   X-Original-To: mvh <at> localhost
   Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 17:28:03 +0300
   From: Vlad Galu <Vlad.Galu <at> rdsnet.ro>
   Organization: Romania Data Systems
   Sender: owner-freebsd-stable <at> freebsd.org
   X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.3 required=5.0
	   tests=AWL,BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE,
		 QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,WEIRD_PORT
	   autolearn=ham version=2.55
   X-Spam-Level: 
   X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

   -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
   Hash: SHA1

   On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 07:02:41 -0700 (PDT) David Wolfskill <david <at> catwhisker.org>
   wrote:

   > Someone else also reported seeing these symptoms with recently-updated
   > sources:
   > 
   > >>> Kernel build for FREEBEAST started on Mon Sep  1 05:25:41 PDT 2003
   > ...
   > ===> ida
   >  <at>  -> /usr/src/sys
(Continue reading)

Alexandr Kovalenko | 1 Sep 18:00 2003
Picon

Re: unionfs related patch

Hello, Alexandr Kovalenko!

On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:19:27AM +0300, you wrote:

> >   David Schultz, in his spare time, has been working through some of the
> > issues I've been able to 'tweak' in the unionfs code ... as he is
> > currently working on forward-patching it to -CURRENT right now, he can't
> > commit the code to the -STABLE tree ... in order to allow others using
> > unionfs to test the patch (I've been running it a few weeks now on a very
> > heavily loaded system), with his permission, I've posted the patch for
> > download at:
> > 
> > 	http://www.hub.org/~scrappy/unionfs
> 
> Looks like it pretty stable. I'm running ~10 days with this patch - no
> even single panic. Thank you!

I was too optimistic. It panics on high loads after 3-10 days.
Is there any progress in work on this patch?

--

-- 
NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food
Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group
http://uafug.org.ua/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable <at> freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe <at> freebsd.org"

(Continue reading)


Gmane