headers
CLIPPINGs Central | 3 Dec 2011 23:08

[SUSPECTED SPAM] van Etten's CLIPPINGs WEEKLY 03 Dec United Nation & Digital Signage Standards

Circulation: 39,250      03/12/2011          Sent to:python <at> freebsd.org 

Your AD here?

contact me

LMP <at> talktalk.net

Boxcar Down: The Albanian Incident by Charles L. Lunsford

Publisher
CLIPPINGs
57 Nutbourne Str
London W10 4HW
England   

Subscriptions & Comments to:   
email: LMP <at> talktalk.net

"Weniger aber Besser", Rams 

Published Daily and Weekly
In Affiliation with:
Weekly Edition 

Primary Sponsor

For QUICK REMOVAL send e-mail to LMP <at> talktalk.net - If you received this e-mail from a friend and would like
to subscribe to our e-mail list, click here. To update your e-mail address, click here.  The newsletter is
paid for by advertisement and sent to Specials Subscribers on behalf of Leadresearch.co.uk. If you wish
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov | 4 Dec 2011 12:52
Picon
Favicon

Obsoleted zope ports deprecation

Good day.

I wrote to you because you are maintainers of zope ports, listed here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope-ports-for-deprecation.html

I'm asking for your approval for this ports deprecation and removing in
one month. Deprecation reasons for each port also listed on link above.

They all rely on long-time unsupported Zope versions. The only supported
versions now is a 2.13 and 2.12. Version 2.13 should be added soon. You
can check latest revision of this port here:
https://github.com/mexicarne/zope/tree/master/www/zope213

or, if you prefer patch against www/zope213:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope213.repocopy.finished.diff.txt

Thanks in advance for response.

--

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Khairil Yusof | 5 Dec 2011 01:07
Favicon

Re: Obsoleted zope ports deprecation

Hi Ruslan,

Yes feel free to delete my Zope related ports, they're outdated, and
most people I believe are now using non-ports system for their Zope and
Plone deployments.

Regards

On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 15:52 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Good day.
> 
> I wrote to you because you are maintainers of zope ports, listed here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope-ports-for-deprecation.html
> 
> I'm asking for your approval for this ports deprecation and removing in
> one month. Deprecation reasons for each port also listed on link above.
> 
> They all rely on long-time unsupported Zope versions. The only supported
> versions now is a 2.13 and 2.12. Version 2.13 should be added soon. You
> can check latest revision of this port here:
> https://github.com/mexicarne/zope/tree/master/www/zope213
> 
> or, if you prefer patch against www/zope213:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope213.repocopy.finished.diff.txt
> 
> Thanks in advance for response.
>
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Denis Shaposhnikov | 5 Dec 2011 01:25
Picon

Re: Obsoleted zope ports deprecation

On 04/12/11 12:52, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:

> I wrote to you because you are maintainers of zope ports, listed here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope-ports-for-deprecation.html
>
> I'm asking for your approval for this ports deprecation and removing in
> one month. Deprecation reasons for each port also listed on link above.

Fill free to remove the ports.

Thanks!
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
NAKAJI Hiroyuki | 5 Dec 2011 10:30
Picon
Favicon

Re: Obsoleted zope ports deprecation

Feel free to remove www/zope210.

Thanks!

(11/12/04 20:52), Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I wrote to you because you are maintainers of zope ports, listed here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope-ports-for-deprecation.html
>
> I'm asking for your approval for this ports deprecation and removing in
> one month. Deprecation reasons for each port also listed on link above.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
FreeBSD bugmaster | 5 Dec 2011 12:07
Picon
Favicon

Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-python <at> FreeBSD.org

Note: to view an individual PR, use:
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).

The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.

S Tracker      Resp.      Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o ports/163063 python     [PATCH] fix for ports-mgmt/portbuilder
o ports/162421 python     lang/python32 fails to build (undefined reference to `
o ports/160717 python     port: lang/python27 causing other ports to hang during
o ports/159215 python     Mk/bsd.python.mk: PYTHON_VERSION is ignored
o ports/156759 python     [patch] lang/python: kevent does not accept KQ_NOTE_EX
o ports/156425 python     lang/python26: Needs to include -L/usr/local/lib/pth i
o ports/156076 python     [patch] databases/py-sqlite3: Undefined symbol "sqlite
o ports/155970 python     [PATCH] lang/python: speed up upgrade-site-packages
o ports/155936 python     lang/python27 Pthread: previous declaration of ...
o ports/155526 python     [PATCH] devel/py-elementtree: ignore if python >= 2.5
f ports/154209 python     [PATCH] lang/python: Install symlink for ptags
o ports/153952 python     lang/python26 + pth fails to reconfigure cflags to inc
o ports/153167 python     Problem with signals, threads, and subprocesses in lan
o ports/152224 python     [patch] fix installed permissions for lang/python27
o ports/151534 python     lang/python26 + WITH_PTH doesn't install correctly
o ports/149167 python     lang/python26 fails to build _ctypes on Sheevaplug (AR
o ports/146957 python     Mk/bsd.python.mk: PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 in environ(7) break
o ports/146823 python     [patch] lang/python26: knob to build _ctypes module ag
o ports/146644 python     lang/python26: WITH_PTH option breaks most ports depen
o ports/140968 python     x11-toolkits/py-tkinter(devel/pth): py26-tkinter-2.6.4
o ports/136917 python     [patch] lang/python26: gettext detection
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov | 6 Dec 2011 08:48
Picon
Favicon

Re: Fwd: Re: Obsoleted zope ports deprecation


Hi, Gerhard.

Please keep python <at>  and ports <at>  in cc:.

Gerhard Schmidt wrote on 12/06/11 10:29:
> 
> 
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Betreff: Re: Obsoleted zope ports deprecation
> Datum: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:24:46 +0100
> Von: Gerhard Schmidt <estartu <at> augusta.de>
> An: NAKAJI Hiroyuki <nakaji <at> jp.freebsd.org>
> 
> (11/12/04 20:52), Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>> Good day.
>>
>> I wrote to you because you are maintainers of zope ports, listed here:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~rm/zope-ports-for-deprecation.html
>>
>> I'm asking for your approval for this ports deprecation and removing in
>> one month. Deprecation reasons for each port also listed on link above.
> 
> Is there a reason to remove these Ports. I'm still using Zope2.7 and
> Zope2.11 in our Production Systems. So why don't keep them.

As Martin already stated there is two major reasons for that:
1. Python 2.4 and python 2.5 are EOL and should be moved from the tree
   (this was done in all major linux distros time ago)
2. Zope < 2.12 are EOL and should be moved from the tree too, because:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
edwin | 7 Dec 2011 18:10
Picon
Favicon

Re: ports/163112: Updates bsd.python.mk to support Zope 2.11, 2.13

Synopsis: Updates bsd.python.mk to support Zope 2.11, 2.13

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs-≥freebsd-python
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Dec 7 17:10:20 UTC 2011
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
bsd.python.mk is freebsd-python territory (via the GNATS Auto Assign
Tool)

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163112
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov | 7 Dec 2011 18:40
Picon
Favicon

Re: ports/163112: Updates bsd.python.mk to support Zope 2.11, 2.13

The following reply was made to PR ports/163112; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src <at> yandex.ru>
To: Kirk Strauser <kirk <at> strauser.com>
Cc: bug-followup <at> FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/163112: Updates bsd.python.mk to support Zope 2.11, 2.13
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:36:33 +0400

 Hi, Kirk.

 Zope 2.7 is in the tree yet - see www/zope.
 Zope 2.13 is not the in tree yet. Yes, www/zope213 directory exists,
 but it contains zope 2.11 actually, because update of this port is
 waiting mentors approval.
 Zope 2.11 is obsoleted too, so i would like to see it deprecated.
 Zope 2.13 will not use SZOPEBASEDIR anymore, so this should not apply to
 it in your patch.

 
 Kirk Strauser wrote on 07.12.2011 21:01:
 > ports/Mk/bsd.python.mk only supports Zope versions 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, and 3.2. That's a problem
because 2.7 is no longer in ports, 2.8-2.10 are deprecated, and it doesn't work with the newer, supported
Zope 2.11 and 2.13 versions that *are* now in ports.
 > 
 > This patch removes the configuration for ZOPE_VERSION 2.7 and adds versions 2.11 and 2.13. It also
changes ZOPE_PORTBRANCH (the default Zope version) to 2.11, which is the oldest non-deprecated version
in ports.
 > 
 > I marked this as serious/medium because the remaining obsolete Zope ports are deprecated a month from
now, and I'd hate to see a period after that when there's no supported version of Zope at all.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Kirk Strauser | 7 Dec 2011 18:50
Favicon

Re: ports/163112: Updates bsd.python.mk to support Zope 2.11, 2.13

The following reply was made to PR ports/163112; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kirk Strauser <kirk <at> strauser.com>
To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: bug-followup <at> FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/163112: Updates bsd.python.mk to support Zope 2.11, 2.13
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:42:18 -0600

 Thanks for the quick reply. My mistake on 2.7; I looked right past it.

 Please don't deprecate 2.11 just yet. It's the last version that's a =
 more-or-less trivial upgrade from 2.10- I think.

 I added 2.13 on the idea that it would probably be there in the next few =
 days.

 Major thanks to everyone who's working on the Zope ports. :-)=
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane