headers
Andrew MacIntyre | 1 Jul 2009 14:57
Picon
Picon

Re: [RFC] lang/python30 (and lang/python*) fixes

Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After reviewing python31 port and freebsd-python's PRs,
> I propose this patch for lang/python30:
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/python30.diff
> 
> Changes are:
> 
> - Honor EXAMPLESDIR, DATADIR and NOPORTEXAMPLES, NOPORTDATA
> - Remove bsddb module in pkg-message since it's removed from
>   Python default modules
>   (python3 user should use databases/py-bsddb3)
> - Fix WITH_UCS4 support (ports/133440)
> - Mark jobs safe
> - Makefile cleanup
> 
> If nobody objects, I'll commit it after 24 hours.
> 
> For python31, shar is updated at the same place:
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/bsd.python.mk-python31.diff
> http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/python31.shar
> 
> For python2*, I'll update them after patches for python3* committed
> (of course if nobody objects)
> and probably include tmclaugh <at> 's patch in ports/109550 for python*.  I
> think this matches
> what bsd.python.mk does.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Li-Wen Hsu | 1 Jul 2009 16:42
Picon
Favicon

Re: [RFC] lang/python30 (and lang/python*) fixes

On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 22:57:14 +1000, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
> Given the experimental nature of Python 3.0, and the fact that 3.1 is 
> out, it seems to me that Python 3.0's time in the ports collection
> should not be extended.

Yes.  But as long as we do not set Python 3.0 as the default Python
version, I thought there is no harm keeping 3.0 in the ports tree.

However, is there any need for keeping python 2.3, or even 2.4 in the
ports tree?

--

-- 
Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu AT FreeBSD.org>
http://lwhsu.org
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Uwe Laverenz | 1 Jul 2009 17:30
Picon

Re: [RFC] lang/python30 (and lang/python*) fixes

Li-Wen Hsu schrieb:

> However, is there any need for keeping python 2.3, or even 2.4 in the
> ports tree?

Yes, 2.4 for example is needed for Zope 2.x and I am glad that the ports
system lets me choose the needed python version with a simple setting in 
/etc/make.conf. :)

bye,
Uwe
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
olli hauer | 1 Jul 2009 23:30
Picon
Picon

Re: ports/135484: port lang/python and python26 build failed

The following reply was made to PR ports/135484; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: olli hauer <ohauer@...>
To: bug-followup@..., ohauer@...
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/135484: port lang/python and python26 build failed
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:25:04 +0200

 hmm, I tried the build a view times after reporting and always it doesn't
 build the package in lang/python (with or without this line
 #PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION?= python2.6 in etc/make.conf)

 Test case was always to deinstall all ports that use python and make
 sure there is nothing left like /usr/local/lib/python*.
 Then delete directories lang/python lang/python2(5|6) remove the line in
 ports/.portsnap.INDEX fetch and update.

 I don't know what happened but port python26 could build at a given time
 where lang/python does noting except extract with the following command
 $> make package DEPENDS_TARGET=package clean

 One thing I remember a day after report the port lang/python tried to build 
 python25 instead python26. 

 It even hasn't work after removing this lines in make.conf
  WRKDIRPREFIX?=  /build/work
  DISTDIR?=       /data/distfiles
  PACKAGES?=      /data/packages

 After your feedback I tried today building package with both ports and
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
lwhsu | 2 Jul 2009 03:47
Picon
Favicon

Re: ports/133440: Building lang/python30 with UCS-4 support doesn't work

Synopsis: Building lang/python30 with UCS-4 support doesn't work

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: lwhsu
State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 2 01:47:10 UTC 2009
State-Changed-Why: 
Committed. Thanks!

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133440
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
dfilter service | 2 Jul 2009 03:50
Picon
Favicon

Re: ports/133440: commit references a PR

The following reply was made to PR ports/133440; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: dfilter@... (dfilter service)
To: bug-followup@...
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/133440: commit references a PR
Date: Thu,  2 Jul 2009 01:46:43 +0000 (UTC)

 lwhsu       2009-07-02 01:46:33 UTC

   FreeBSD ports repository

   Modified files:
     lang/python30        Makefile pkg-message pkg-plist 
     lang/python30/files  patch-setup.py 
   Log:
   - Honor EXAMPLESDIR, DATADIR and NOPORTEXAMPLES, NOPORTDATA
   - Remove bsddb module in pkg-message since it's removed from
     Python default modules
     (python3 user should use databases/py-bsddb3)
   - Fix WITH_UCS4 support
   - Mark jobs safe
   - Makefile/patch cleanup

   PR:             ports/133440
   Submitted by:   Paul Hoffman <phoffman AT proper.com>

   Revision  Changes    Path
   1.156     +15 -18    ports/lang/python30/Makefile
   1.20      +1 -1      ports/lang/python30/files/patch-setup.py
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
olli hauer | 2 Jul 2009 09:55
Picon
Picon

Re: ports/135484: port lang/python and python26 build failed

>Synopsis: port lang/python and python26 build failed

> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: lwhsu
> State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 30 16:13:43 UTC 2009
> State-Changed-Why: 
> I cannot reproduce here.  Could you update your ports tree and try
> again.  If it still fails, please list your /etc/make.conf and the
> installed packages.l

> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135484

hmm, I tried the build a view times after reporting and always it
doesn't
build the package in lang/python (with or without this line
#PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION?= python2.6 in etc/make.conf)

Test case was always to deinstall all ports that use python and make
sure there is nothing left like /usr/local/lib/python*.
Then delete directories lang/python lang/python2(5|6) remove the line in
ports/.portsnap.INDEX fetch and update.

I don't know what happened but port python26 could build at a given time
where lang/python does noting except extract with the following command
$> make package DEPENDS_TARGET=package clean

One thing I remember a day after report the port lang/python tried to
build 
python25 instead python26.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Andrew MacIntyre | 3 Jul 2009 13:56
Picon
Picon

Re: [RFC] lang/python30 (and lang/python*) fixes

Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 22:57:14 +1000, Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
>> Given the experimental nature of Python 3.0, and the fact that 3.1 is 
>> out, it seems to me that Python 3.0's time in the ports collection
>> should not be extended.
> 
> Yes.  But as long as we do not set Python 3.0 as the default Python
> version, I thought there is no harm keeping 3.0 in the ports tree.

Python 3.0 was never intended for production use, and is pretty much 
dead as far as the Python dev team are concerned.  A decision has 
basically been taken that no further maintenance releases will be 
issued.  Very few third party extension modules have been ported to it.
All effort devoted to Python 3.x is being focussed on 3.1 and later.

I think there are strong grounds for burying the 3.0 port, in the same 
way that release candidate ports get buried when a final release is made 
- Python 3.x was effectively a release candidate (beta release more 
like) of Python 3.1.

> However, is there any need for keeping python 2.3, or even 2.4 in the
> ports tree?

2.4 definitely, as Zope is still tied (officially) to it.  2.3 is still 
widely used in some environments, and is still being actively supported 
by some third party module developers.

--

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew I MacIntyre                     "These thoughts are mine alone..."
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
edwin | 3 Jul 2009 15:50
Picon
Favicon

Re: ports/136283: [update] net/py-libnet : Update to 1.1

Synopsis: [update] net/py-libnet : Update to 1.1

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs-≥freebsd-python
Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 3 13:50:22 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
freebsd-python <at>  wants this port PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=136283
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports-bugs <at> freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-bugs-unsubscribe <at> freebsd.org"
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
wxs | 3 Jul 2009 17:17
Picon
Favicon

Re: ports/136283: [update] net/py-libnet : Update to 1.1

Synopsis: [update] net/py-libnet : Update to 1.1

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: wxs
State-Changed-When: Fri Jul 3 15:17:51 UTC 2009
State-Changed-Why: 
Committed. Thanks!

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=136283
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane