Alexander Best | 1 Dec 2011 01:25
Picon
Favicon

Re: Remove debug echo

On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
> kill it.
> 
> Warner
> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> > Any objections to this?  It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld' 
> > output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
> > 
> > Index: newvers.sh
> > ===================================================================
> > --- newvers.sh	(revision 228074)
> > +++ newvers.sh	(working copy)
> >  <at>  <at>  -99,7 +99,6  <at>  <at>  for dir in /bin /usr/bin /usr/local/bin; do
> > done
> > 
> > if [ -n "$svnversion" ] ; then
> > -	echo "$svnversion"
> > 	svn=`cd ${SYSDIR} && $svnversion`
> > 	case "$svn" in
> > 	[0-9]*)	svn=" r${svn}" ;;

also...

when running buildkernel via 'make -s', do we really need all those module
printfs? i see messages for "cleandir", "obj", "depend" and "all". i think for
'make -s', that's pure overkill!

for a GENERIC kernel, 'make' enters ~ 670 module dirs. take that times 4 and
you'll get 2680 lines of output. not really *silent*, is it? ;)
(Continue reading)

Garrett Cooper | 1 Dec 2011 02:21
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Remove debug echo

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best <arundel <at> freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
>> kill it.
>>
>> Warner
>> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> > Any objections to this?  It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
>> > output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
>> >
>> > Index: newvers.sh
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- newvers.sh      (revision 228074)
>> > +++ newvers.sh      (working copy)
>> >  <at>  <at>  -99,7 +99,6  <at>  <at>  for dir in /bin /usr/bin /usr/local/bin; do
>> > done
>> >
>> > if [ -n "$svnversion" ] ; then
>> > -   echo "$svnversion"
>> >     svn=`cd ${SYSDIR} && $svnversion`
>> >     case "$svn" in
>> >     [0-9]*) svn=" r${svn}" ;;
>
> also...
>
> when running buildkernel via 'make -s', do we really need all those module
> printfs? i see messages for "cleandir", "obj", "depend" and "all". i think for
> 'make -s', that's pure overkill!
>
> for a GENERIC kernel, 'make' enters ~ 670 module dirs. take that times 4 and
(Continue reading)

Alexander Best | 1 Dec 2011 02:43
Picon
Favicon

Re: Remove debug echo

On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best <arundel <at> freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
> >> kill it.
> >>
> >> Warner
> >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> > Any objections to this?  It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
> >> > output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
> >> >
> >> > Index: newvers.sh
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > --- newvers.sh      (revision 228074)
> >> > +++ newvers.sh      (working copy)
> >> >  <at>  <at>  -99,7 +99,6  <at>  <at>  for dir in /bin /usr/bin /usr/local/bin; do
> >> > done
> >> >
> >> > if [ -n "$svnversion" ] ; then
> >> > -   echo "$svnversion"
> >> >     svn=`cd ${SYSDIR} && $svnversion`
> >> >     case "$svn" in
> >> >     [0-9]*) svn=" r${svn}" ;;
> >
> > also...
> >
> > when running buildkernel via 'make -s', do we really need all those module
> > printfs? i see messages for "cleandir", "obj", "depend" and "all". i think for
> > 'make -s', that's pure overkill!
> >
(Continue reading)

Garrett Cooper | 1 Dec 2011 02:59
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Remove debug echo

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best <arundel <at> freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best <arundel <at> freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
>> >> kill it.
>> >>
>> >> Warner
>> >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Any objections to this?  It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
>> >> > output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
>> >> >
>> >> > Index: newvers.sh
>> >> > ===================================================================
>> >> > --- newvers.sh      (revision 228074)
>> >> > +++ newvers.sh      (working copy)
>> >> >  <at>  <at>  -99,7 +99,6  <at>  <at>  for dir in /bin /usr/bin /usr/local/bin; do
>> >> > done
>> >> >
>> >> > if [ -n "$svnversion" ] ; then
>> >> > -   echo "$svnversion"
>> >> >     svn=`cd ${SYSDIR} && $svnversion`
>> >> >     case "$svn" in
>> >> >     [0-9]*) svn=" r${svn}" ;;
>> >
>> > also...
>> >
>> > when running buildkernel via 'make -s', do we really need all those module
>> > printfs? i see messages for "cleandir", "obj", "depend" and "all". i think for
>> > 'make -s', that's pure overkill!
(Continue reading)

Milan Obuch | 1 Dec 2011 07:20
X-Face
Face
Picon

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov <max <at> mxcrypt.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov
> > <pluknet <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current <at> dino.sk>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source
> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying
> >>> what to csup
> >>>
> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
> >>>
> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just
> >>>
> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
> >>>
> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config
> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two
> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to
> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older
> >>> version sources.
> >>>
> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make
> >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version...
> >>>
> >>> Is it something I do not know about or is it an oversight? I
(Continue reading)

Garrett Cooper | 1 Dec 2011 08:15
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Remove debug echo

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best <arundel <at> freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best <arundel <at> freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> > On Tue Nov 29 11, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> >> kill it.
>>> >>
>>> >> Warner
>>> >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 2:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Any objections to this?  It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
>>> >> > output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Index: newvers.sh
>>> >> > ===================================================================
>>> >> > --- newvers.sh      (revision 228074)
>>> >> > +++ newvers.sh      (working copy)
>>> >> >  <at>  <at>  -99,7 +99,6  <at>  <at>  for dir in /bin /usr/bin /usr/local/bin; do
>>> >> > done
>>> >> >
>>> >> > if [ -n "$svnversion" ] ; then
>>> >> > -   echo "$svnversion"
>>> >> >     svn=`cd ${SYSDIR} && $svnversion`
>>> >> >     case "$svn" in
>>> >> >     [0-9]*) svn=" r${svn}" ;;
>>> >
>>> > also...
>>> >
>>> > when running buildkernel via 'make -s', do we really need all those module
>>> > printfs? i see messages for "cleandir", "obj", "depend" and "all". i think for
(Continue reading)

Sergey Kandaurov | 1 Dec 2011 10:12
Picon

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current <at> dino.sk> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
> Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov <max <at> mxcrypt.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov
>> > <pluknet <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current <at> dino.sk>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source
>> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying
>> >>> what to csup
>> >>>
>> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
>> >>>
>> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just
>> >>>
>> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
>> >>>
>> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config
>> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two
>> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to
>> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older
>> >>> version sources.
>> >>>
>> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make
>> >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version...
>> >>>
(Continue reading)

Kostik Belousov | 1 Dec 2011 10:17
Picon

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current <at> dino.sk> wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
> > Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov <max <at> mxcrypt.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov
> >> > <pluknet <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current <at> dino.sk>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> Hi,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source
> >> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying
> >> >>> what to csup
> >> >>>
> >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
> >> >>>
> >> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just
> >> >>>
> >> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
> >> >>>
> >> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config
> >> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two
> >> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to
> >> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older
> >> >>> version sources.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make
> >> >>> installworld install example files pointing to older version...
(Continue reading)

Sergey Kandaurov | 1 Dec 2011 11:10
Picon

Re: Incorrect tag= in /usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/sta(ble|ndard) in 9.0-PRERELEASE?

On 1 December 2011 13:17, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current <at> dino.sk> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
>> > Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov <max <at> mxcrypt.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov
>> >> > <pluknet <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch <freebsd-current <at> dino.sk>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> Hi,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I am playing a bit with 9.0-PRERELEASE compiling it from source
>> >> >>> updated via csup. In both example files there is line specifying
>> >> >>> what to csup
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> which is incorrect, I think. It is convenient for me to issue just
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> csup -h cvsup.freebsd.sk /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> to update full sources without need to create any cvsup config
>> >> >>> file, however in system installed from 9.0 snapshot (maybe two
>> >> >>> weeks old) this file points to version 8 files, so I need to
>> >> >>> correct it for 9.0-PRERELEASE to not accidentally download older
>> >> >>> version sources.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The same is also true after upgrade from source - make
(Continue reading)

Max Khon | 1 Dec 2011 11:44

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

Sevan,

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Sevan / Venture37 <venture37 <at> gmail.com>wrote:

On 30/11/2011 16:03, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>
>> system breaks if you try to add dtrace support to a system built with
>> profile support.
>>
>
> sorry, I meant *without* profile support.

Are you sure you mean profile support and not CTF data?

Max
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current <at> freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe <at> freebsd.org"


Gmane