1 Sep 2009 01:26
Re: [PATCH] USB Harddrive not recognized (umass appears, da0 not)
Tobias Grosser <grosser <at> fim.uni-passau.de>
2009-08-31 23:26:57 GMT
2009-08-31 23:26:57 GMT
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 21:07 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 11:52 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 07:09:29PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I looks like your device is hanging on SCSI command 0x12,00,00,00,4a,00 > > > > > > 0x12 is an inquiry, which is bad if the device has problems with. > > > > I tried Linux on the same computer and the drive worked without any > > problems. > > > > If those are timestamps then there is a 5 second delay. > I wouldn't say that this is without problems. > Maybe Linux just has a different handling of the case. > > > --------------------------------------- > > linux_dmesg.log is attached. > > --------------------------------------- > > > > There was also another report where the drive did not work on FreeBSD. I > > mailed the user and he did not get it to run on FreeBSD, but his drive > > also works on Linux. > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-September/028999.html > > > > As I have two of these drives, I am pretty sure my device is not > > completely broken, but WD has some uncommon/broken way to interact with(Continue reading)
).
So for us wrong-minded people with wi(4) hardware that lacks WPA support
is it better to stick with 7.x for now? Any patches available or a rough
ETA? Is there a specific set of 8-CURRENT commits before which WEP is
known (or strongly suspected) to work? Anything others can do to help
besides ask annoying questions? (Sadly I'm not quite enough of a kernel
hacker to adopt maintainership of wi.)
Thanks!
JN
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current <at> freebsd.org mailing list

RSS Feed