1 Oct 2003 01:07
Re: Future of OpenGL package
Andre Bleau <bleau <at> igb.umontreal.ca>
2003-09-30 23:07:36 GMT
2003-09-30 23:07:36 GMT
Brian Ford wrote: >... > >Even, with 1.4 headers, you would sill need to jump through hoops to use > >1.4 functionality. You will still need to load the functions dynamicaly > >before using them. You wouldn't be able to simply call the functions as > >when developing for UNIX. > > >A lot of the functionallity I need is just the defines. Ex: >GL_MIRRORED_REPEAT_ARB Here, I don't need to load any extensions. > >When I do need to load extensions, having the defines for the >proper prototypes around would be nice. 1.2 and 1.3 defines & prototypes are already there in /usr/include/w32api/GL/glext.h >... > >>As for the extension loading library, it's a don't care for me. > > > >Then, I guess you never had to work with extensions... > > >No, I just don't think it is that hard to write code for it. It's not hard to write new code that uses GL 1.2+ that targets only the Cygwin and Mingw platforms. What's hard is to port some code for UNIX that calls GL 1.2+ functions. You have to track each call and modify it to load the function first when compiled for Cygwin. >... > >So, I propose to make a quick update of the OpenGL package ASAP, while we(Continue reading)
RSS Feed