1 May 2003 01:17
Re: Cygwin survey: Next vim version with perl support?
Gareth Pearce <tilps <at> hotmail.com>
2003-04-30 23:17:16 GMT
2003-04-30 23:17:16 GMT
> Because the "cat/sed" combination is much harder to use :) > > On second thought, make that a "visual editor"... Amusingly - nano with every available feature turned on, is only 5% larger than cat + sed. It is 45% larger then ed though. I wont bother comparing it to vim or emacs... (Okay so i ignored library dependcies in the above comparisons - I dont think i'm cheating Too much) Gareth - bias revealed, returns to the shadows.
RSS Feed