Dave Korn | 2 Jan 19:59 2008

RE: BLODA FAQ entry.

On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> 
>>  The long-promised FAQ entry.
>> 
>> winsup/doc/ChangeLog
>> 
>> 2007-29-12  Dave Korn  
>> 
>> 	* faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda):  New entry.
>> 	(faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus):  Link to faq.using.bloda.
>> 	* faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang):  Likewise link to faq.using.bloda.
> 
> Looks good.  Thanks for doing this.  Please check in.

  Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the
sources are changed, but I guess not.  How do we get the online version of the
FAQ to rebuild?

    cheers,
      DaveK
--

-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Christopher Faylor | 2 Jan 20:07 2008

Re: BLODA FAQ entry.

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> 
>>>  The long-promised FAQ entry.
>>> 
>>> winsup/doc/ChangeLog
>>> 
>>> 2007-29-12  Dave Korn  
>>> 
>>> 	* faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda):  New entry.
>>> 	(faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus):  Link to faq.using.bloda.
>>> 	* faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang):  Likewise link to faq.using.bloda.
>> 
>> Looks good.  Thanks for doing this.  Please check in.
>
>
>  Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the
>sources are changed, but I guess not.  How do we get the online version of the
>FAQ to rebuild?

It isn't automatic.  I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in creating
the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this.

cgf

Dave Korn | 2 Jan 20:46 2008

RE: BLODA FAQ entry.

On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  The long-promised FAQ entry.
>>>> 
>>>> winsup/doc/ChangeLog
>>>> 
>>>> 2007-29-12  Dave Korn
>>>> 
>>>> 	* faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda):  New entry.
>>>> 	(faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus):  Link to faq.using.bloda.
>>>> 	* faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang):  Likewise link to faq.using.bloda.
>>> 
>>> Looks good.  Thanks for doing this.  Please check in.
>> 
>> 
>>  Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the
>> sources are changed, but I guess not.  How do we get the online version of
>> the FAQ to rebuild?
> 
> It isn't automatic.  I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in
> creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this.
> 
> cgf

  Ah.  Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear break
(Continue reading)

Christopher Faylor | 2 Jan 20:57 2008

Re: BLODA FAQ entry.

On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:46:16PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>> On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>  The long-promised FAQ entry.
>>>>> 
>>>>> winsup/doc/ChangeLog
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2007-29-12  Dave Korn
>>>>> 
>>>>> 	* faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda):  New entry.
>>>>> 	(faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus):  Link to faq.using.bloda.
>>>>> 	* faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang):  Likewise link to faq.using.bloda.
>>>> 
>>>> Looks good.  Thanks for doing this.  Please check in.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the
>>> sources are changed, but I guess not.  How do we get the online version of
>>> the FAQ to rebuild?
>> 
>> It isn't automatic.  I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in
>> creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this.
>
>  Ah.  Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear break
>of some description.  (I could /probably/ update just the two related pages
(Continue reading)

Dave Korn | 3 Jan 00:10 2008

RE: BLODA FAQ entry.

On 02 January 2008 19:58, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:46:16PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  The long-promised FAQ entry.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> winsup/doc/ChangeLog
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2007-29-12  Dave Korn
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 	* faq-using.xml (faq.using.bloda):  New entry.
>>>>>> 	(faq.using.firewall, faq.using.anti-virus):  Link to faq.using.bloda.
>>>>>> 	* faq-setup.xml (faq.setup.hang):  Likewise link to faq.using.bloda.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Looks good.  Thanks for doing this.  Please check in.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the
>>>> sources are changed, but I guess not.  How do we get the online version
>>>> of the FAQ to rebuild?
>>> 
>>> It isn't automatic.  I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in
>>> creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this.
>> 
(Continue reading)

Corinna Vinschen | 7 Jan 14:09 2008

Re: BLODA FAQ entry.

On Jan  2 19:46, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
> >> On 29 December 2007 18:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:43:09PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
> >>>>  The long-promised FAQ entry.
> >>>> [...]
> >>> [...]
> >>  Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the
> >> sources are changed, but I guess not.  How do we get the online version of
> >> the FAQ to rebuild?
> > 
> > It isn't automatic.  I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in
> > creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this.
> > 
> > cgf
> 
>   Ah.  Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear break
> of some description.  (I could /probably/ update just the two related pages
> with copies freshly built from source, but I'd rather someone who's done it
> regularly before and knows of any hidden gotcha's did it, or at least said if
> it's really that simple before I went and borked anything.)  Guess I'll just
> be patient.

Erm... are you talking about me, by any chance?  I have now updated
the FAQ.  Fortunately it's quite simple by using cvs.  I don't know
of any hidden gotchas.  If there are any, I'd be as screwed up as
anybody :)

Corinna
(Continue reading)

Corinna Vinschen | 7 Jan 14:11 2008

Re: [patch] un-NT-ify cygcheck (was: cygwin 1.5.25-7: cygcheck does not work?)

Hi Chris,

On Dec 23 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 22 11:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >On Dec 20 19:35, Brian Dessent wrote:
> > >> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> > Unless Corinna says differently, I think she wants to be in control of
> > >> > what goes into the branch so I don't want to suggest that you should
> > >> > check it in there too.
> > >> 
> > >> Okay, I'll let her take care of the branch since she's been handling all
> > >> the releases from it.
> > >
> > >Please check it in to the branch.  I guess it might be a good idea to
> > >release a 1.5.27-8 at one point.  I'll be more or less unavailable the
> > >next two weeks but perhaps I can release a new version over christmas.
> > 
> > I have some pipe-related patches that probably should go into the branch
> > too, FYI.  I'm just waiting for word that they fix a reported problem.
> 
> Ok, I'll wait.  No worries.

Did you get feedback about your change?

Corinna

--

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
(Continue reading)

Christopher Faylor | 7 Jan 14:12 2008

Re: [patch] un-NT-ify cygcheck (was: cygwin 1.5.25-7: cygcheck does not work?)

On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>On Dec 23 10:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Dec 22 11:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 10:48:51AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > >On Dec 20 19:35, Brian Dessent wrote:
>> > >> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > >> 
>> > >> > Unless Corinna says differently, I think she wants to be in control of
>> > >> > what goes into the branch so I don't want to suggest that you should
>> > >> > check it in there too.
>> > >> 
>> > >> Okay, I'll let her take care of the branch since she's been handling all
>> > >> the releases from it.
>> > >
>> > >Please check it in to the branch.  I guess it might be a good idea to
>> > >release a 1.5.27-8 at one point.  I'll be more or less unavailable the
>> > >next two weeks but perhaps I can release a new version over christmas.
>> > 
>> > I have some pipe-related patches that probably should go into the branch
>> > too, FYI.  I'm just waiting for word that they fix a reported problem.
>> 
>> Ok, I'll wait.  No worries.
>
>Did you get feedback about your change?

No.  I had some email problems in the last month so I'm resyncing with the
people who would be testing.

(Continue reading)

Dave Korn | 8 Jan 21:19 2008

RE: BLODA FAQ entry.

On 07 January 2008 13:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:

> On Jan  2 19:46, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 02 January 2008 19:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 06:59:03PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:

>>>>  Hmm, I thought the website might update itself automagically when the
>>>> sources are changed, but I guess not.  How do we get the online version
>>>> of the FAQ to rebuild?
>>> 
>>> It isn't automatic.  I usually wait for "someone" with dessent skills in
>>> creating the pages and transferring them to the right location to do this.
>>> 
>>> cgf
>> 
>>   Ah.  Who, to judge from lack of posting, is still away on xmas/newyear
>> break of some description. 

> Erm... are you talking about me, by any chance?  

  I don't think so... I think the clue is in the typo :)

> I have now updated the FAQ.

  But thanks nonetheless!

>  Fortunately it's quite simple by using cvs.  I don't know
> of any hidden gotchas.  If there are any, I'd be as screwed up as
> anybody :)

(Continue reading)

Corinna Vinschen | 9 Jan 09:57 2008

Re: BLODA FAQ entry.

On Jan  8 20:19, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 07 January 2008 13:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >  Fortunately it's quite simple by using cvs.  I don't know
> > of any hidden gotchas.  If there are any, I'd be as screwed up as
> > anybody :)
> 
>   So as far as you know we just build winsup as normal and commit the
> generated html files as new revisions over the existing ones in wwwdocs, yep?

Yep.  Usually I had to `sudo cvs up` in
/sourceware/www/sourceware/htdocs/cygwin afterwards, but for some reason
the `cvs ci' was enough this time.

Corinna

--

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat


Gmane