On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:22:50PM -0500, Joshua Steele <selerius <at> codefusion.org> wrote: > I think BEFORE we have the meeting, we should the topics of discussion > clearly laid out in chronological order....with detailed information about > that topic. Yes. An agenda would be nice. -- -- Anthony Chavez, Consultant BSD Consultants mailto:acc@... http://www.bsdconsultants.com/
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 07:39:06PM +0100, Stacy Olivas <olivas@...> wrote: > Ok, > The minutes of meeting #1 have been posted (along with the IRC session log > used) at > http://digiflux.org/fbsd-advocacy/ You can pretty much count on me logging everything, since my client is set up to do that anyway. In the future, it would be nice to have an edited log, containing only the important bits. I would suggest that the person doing the logging edit them before submitting them. But if, for some reason, the submitter can't edit it, I think it should be the maintainer's job to do it. I was really busy that day, or I would have done it myself. -- -- Anthony Chavez, Consultant BSD Consultants mailto:acc@... http://www.bsdconsultants.com/
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 05:23:59PM -0500, Joshua Steele <selerius <at> codefusion.org> wrote: > Ok. What is the OFFICIAL project name? My vote would be for "The BSD Advocacy Project," because it sounds a little more official. This will be more important when used in whitepapers, presentations, etc. -- -- Anthony Chavez, Consultant BSD Consultants mailto:acc@... http://www.bsdconsultants.com/
Tommorow I will be attempting to write up a report on the goals, and stuff of the BSD Advocacy Project, this right up will be a draft and will be subjected to the crisismic of the list, and basically everyone as a whole. Although at the current moment someone keeps sidetracking me from my duties. On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 17:18, Anthony C. Chavez wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 05:23:59PM -0500, Joshua Steele <selerius@...> wrote: > > Ok. What is the OFFICIAL project name? > > My vote would be for "The BSD Advocacy Project," because it sounds a > little more official. This will be more important when used in > whitepapers, presentations, etc. -- -- Peter Kieser pfak@... () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ - against microsoft attachments
hello all, i am going to be mapping out where everyone involved with the project is located...just general location. This data will be used for future conferences (in case we can get a booth, etc.) and to just generally know where everyone is at. if everyone could just email me personally (not to the list...unless you want everyone to know your location) the facts about your whereabouts, i will start plotting points, and associating them with names. No details...just tell me the name of the nearest large city..The data is kept in strict confidentiality, and its not going to be released to anyone except possibly the project CORE group, or the person in charge of organizing events, etc. if you don't want to participate, thats fine..but the more data we have, the better. That way, if we get word of a conference being held in say Washington D.C. in the States, we will know who to contact to see if they can attend, etc. or maybe (would be awesome if so) get some people to run a booth at a conference, etc. -- Josh
Josh, Take a look at this that was posted to -chat. Using xearth might be a good idea, I've left the rest of the post here because it was funny. :) [lifted from freebsd-chat] On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 06:27:23PM +0100, phk@... wrote: > In message <20030202103721.3996ec9c.nospam@...>, Stephen Hilton write > s: > > >> maybe we should make some sort of geographical registration > >> web page so that people can find each other? > > Well, new committers are allowed to mark themselves in the xearth port: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/convent ions.html > > Committers should know this already. The February 2003 issue of Scientific American has an article that reminded me of this file (xearth/files/freebsd.committers.markers). It is titled `Satellite-Guided Munitions', and describes some nifty kits you can use to upgrade your `cheap' dumb bomb to a smart bomb that can strike within a few meters of the programmed coordinates 90% of the time (or similar accuracy -- I don't have the article in front of me at the moment).(Continue reading)
I posted last week: Specialties: 1. Technical/Admin (acts as postmaster, server admin, user admin, www admin, gets mirrors set up with others, etc) 2. Recruiting (main person to hunt down and recruit more advocating people) 3. Advocating (spearhead events, learn about events, keep calendar, find people to help out with events, etc) 4. HTML/Design (keeps the web site in tip top shape, looking good, and organized) 5. Press/Media/Writing (talk to the press, write press releases, etc) 6. Programmer (writes scripts and code for the site, and works closely with the HTML/Design person to make sure things are " perfect") Here's the responses: Eric Anderson 1. 10 2. 5 3. 4 4. 5 5. 5 6. 7 Linh Pham 1. 8 2. 2 3. 5 4. 9 (HTML) / 6 (Design - check out closedsrc.org for an example) 5. 6 (I can write... as I've done so before, but mostly tech articles) 6. 7 (PHP) / 5 (Perl) / 5.5 (Python)(Continue reading)
Oops - I should have been more clear.. It's in order from highest to lowest, by category - so for me (Eric Anderson), my highest score was for category 1, second highest was category 6, etc. Eric Linh Pham wrote: > On 2003-02-03 16:39 -0600, Eric Anderson <anderson@...> wrote: > > # And here's the compiled results: > # Name, and sorted categories for that person: > # Eric Anderson: 1, 6, 5, 4, 2, 3 > # Linh Pham: 4, 1, 6, 5, 3, 2 > # Josh Steele: 3, 1, 2, 5, 4, 6 > # Josef El-Reyes: 6, 4, 3, 5, 1, 2 > # Anthony Chavez: 6, 4, 1, 3, 2, 5 > # Stacy Olivas: 1, 5, 2, 3, 4, 6 > > I assume that 1 stand for lowest score and 6 for highest? > -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson http://www.bsdevents.org Free/Open/Net/BSD Attitudes are contagious, is yours worth catching? ------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:39:27PM -0600, Eric Anderson <anderson <at> bsdevents.org> wrote: Welcome back, Eric. Hope you had a good weekend/anniversary! > Anthony Chavez: 6, 4, 1, 3, 2, 5 > 6. Anthony Chavez > > How about that for a CORE team? Speaking for myself, your rankings are quite accurate, and I'd be quite comfortable in your recommended position as programmer. -- -- Anthony Chavez, Consultant BSD Consultants mailto:acc@... http://www.bsdconsultants.com/
Sorry, I seemed to have missed the beginning of this thread so I didn't notice the results, thought it was another cross post. Here is my stuff. 1. 10 2. 8 3. 9 4. 3 5. 7 6. 5 On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 14:39, Eric Anderson wrote: > I posted last week: > Specialties: > 1. Technical/Admin (acts as postmaster, server admin, user admin, www > admin, gets mirrors set up with others, etc) > 2. Recruiting (main person to hunt down and recruit more advocating people) > 3. Advocating (spearhead events, learn about events, keep calendar, find > people to help out with events, etc) > 4. HTML/Design (keeps the web site in tip top shape, looking good, and > organized) > 5. Press/Media/Writing (talk to the press, write press releases, etc) > 6. Programmer (writes scripts and code for the site, and works closely > with the HTML/Design person to make sure things are " > perfect") -- -- Peter Kieser pfak@... () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail(Continue reading)
RSS Feed12 | |
|---|---|
1 | |
24 | |
10 | |
18 | |
13 | |
10 | |
32 | |
32 | |
14 | |
63 | |
63 |
