headers
Neil Tiffin | 1 Jan 21:23
Favicon

Cairo & pixman depend on each other?

Package manager version: 0.28.6
Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Jan  1 14:15:01 2009, 10.5,  
i386

try to install pixman, but get error about cairo
===================================
clip-test.c:97: warning: unused variable 'p1'
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -Wall - 
fvisibility=hidden   -o clip-test clip-test.o ../pixman/libpixman-1.la  
-L/sw/lib -L/sw/lib/freetype219/lib -L/sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib -L/usr/ 
X11/lib -Wl,-framework,CoreServices -Wl,-framework,ApplicationServices  
-lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 - 
lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lz - 
lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl
mkdir .libs
libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/lib/libcairo.la' or  
unhandled argument `/sw/lib/libcairo.la'
make[2]: *** [clip-test] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
### execution of make failed, exit code 2
Removing runtime build-lock...
Removing build-lock package...
/sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-pixman-0.12.0-1
(Reading database ... 77697 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-pixman-0.12.0-1 ...
Failed: phase compiling: pixman-0.12.0-1 failed

Try to install cario, but it depends on pixman?
=====================================
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Martin Costabel | 1 Jan 23:03
Picon

Re: Cairo & pixman depend on each other?

Neil Tiffin wrote:
> Package manager version: 0.28.6
> Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Jan  1 14:15:01 2009, 10.5,  
> i386
> 
> try to install pixman, but get error about cairo
> ===================================
> clip-test.c:97: warning: unused variable 'p1'
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -Wall - 
> fvisibility=hidden   -o clip-test clip-test.o ../pixman/libpixman-1.la  
> -L/sw/lib -L/sw/lib/freetype219/lib -L/sw/lib/pango-ft219/lib -L/usr/ 
> X11/lib -Wl,-framework,CoreServices -Wl,-framework,ApplicationServices  
> -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 - 
> lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lz - 
> lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl
> mkdir .libs
> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/lib/libcairo.la' or  
> unhandled argument `/sw/lib/libcairo.la'
> make[2]: *** [clip-test] Error 1

Obviously, pixman needs a configure parameter --disable-gtk

--

-- 
Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
M. Singh | 2 Jan 01:57
Picon

Labplot missing from fink ?

Hello,

	I have enabled unstable.

	And labplot appears to be present in fink :

	http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/labplot

	I simply cannot seem to get my installation to get to realize this :

	$ fink info labplot
Information about 7601 packages read in 1 seconds.
Failed: no package found for specification 'labplot'!

	I have run selfupdate, index, scanpackages, update-all multiple times.

	selfupdate-cvs reveals :

	U 10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/labplot.info

	But fink install fails as above.

Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Alexander Hansen | 2 Jan 02:11
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Labplot missing from fink ?


On Jan 1, 2009, at 7:57 PM, M. Singh wrote:

> Hello,
>
> 	I have enabled unstable.
>
> 	And labplot appears to be present in fink :
>
> 	http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/package.php/labplot
>
> 	I simply cannot seem to get my installation to get to realize this :
>
> 	$ fink info labplot
> Information about 7601 packages read in 1 seconds.
> Failed: no package found for specification 'labplot'!
>
>
> 	I have run selfupdate, index, scanpackages, update-all multiple  
> times.
>
> 	selfupdate-cvs reveals :
>
> 	U 10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/sci/labplot.info
>
> 	But fink install fails as above.
>
> Thanks.
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
M. Singh | 2 Jan 09:47
Picon

Preventing the update of a specific package

Hello

I just installed a package from unstable that necessitated the 
compilation of gcc43. On this slow machine, this process tool half a day.

Is there a way I can prevent this from occurring again when I issue fink 
update-all or anything like that ?

Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Alexander Hansen | 2 Jan 16:08
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Preventing the update of a specific package

M. Singh wrote:
> Hello
>
> I just installed a package from unstable that necessitated the 
> compilation of gcc43. On this slow machine, this process tool half a day.
>
> Is there a way I can prevent this from occurring again when I issue fink 
> update-all or anything like that ?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>   
(I have to chuckle at "half a day"--on 10.4 on my G4 it takes 3 days to
build gcc43; on 10.5 it's more like a day and a half on the same
machine, if I recall correctly)

If you want to keep a specific package out of the upgrade list, you'll
just have to avoid using "update-all".  We don't have
"update-all-except"; though a little shell script could do that.

Or, there are unofficial binary distributions; where "unofficial" means
that the project doesn't control them, and therefore if there's a bad
binary all we can do is try to fix whatever is causing the misbuild and
tell you to rebuild whatever package is problematic.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Neil Tiffin | 2 Jan 17:01
Favicon

Re: Cairo & pixman depend on each other?


On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:

> Neil Tiffin wrote:
>> Package manager version: 0.28.6
>> Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Jan  1 14:15:01 2009,  
>> 10.5,  i386
>> try to install pixman, but get error about cairo
>> ===================================
>> clip-test.c:97: warning: unused variable 'p1'
>> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -Wall -  
>> fvisibility=hidden   -o clip-test clip-test.o ../pixman/ 
>> libpixman-1.la  -L/sw/lib -L/sw/lib/freetype219/lib -L/sw/lib/pango- 
>> ft219/lib -L/usr/ X11/lib -Wl,-framework,CoreServices -Wl,- 
>> framework,ApplicationServices  -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 - 
>> latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 - lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 - 
>> lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lz - lfontconfig - 
>> lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl
>> mkdir .libs
>> libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/lib/libcairo.la' or   
>> unhandled argument `/sw/lib/libcairo.la'
>> make[2]: *** [clip-test] Error 1
>
> Obviously, pixman needs a configure parameter --disable-gtk

Did that and it all compiled, not sure if I broke anything else.

thanks,

Neil
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Martin Costabel | 2 Jan 17:07
Picon

Re: Cairo & pixman depend on each other?

Neil Tiffin wrote:
[]
>> Obviously, pixman needs a configure parameter --disable-gtk
> 
> Did that and it all compiled, not sure if I broke anything else.

I don't think so. The only influence of that flag is that some tests are 
not compiled and executed. But this has no effect on the installed files.

--

-- 
Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
M. Singh | 2 Jan 18:40
Picon

Re: Preventing the update of a specific package

Alexander Hansen wrote:
> M. Singh wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I just installed a package from unstable that necessitated the 
>> compilation of gcc43. On this slow machine, this process tool half a day.
>>
>> Is there a way I can prevent this from occurring again when I issue fink 
>> update-all or anything like that ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>   
> (I have to chuckle at "half a day"--on 10.4 on my G4 it takes 3 days to
> build gcc43; on 10.5 it's more like a day and a half on the same
> machine, if I recall correctly)
> 
> If you want to keep a specific package out of the upgrade list, you'll
> just have to avoid using "update-all".  We don't have
> "update-all-except"; though a little shell script could do that.
> 
> Or, there are unofficial binary distributions; where "unofficial" means
> that the project doesn't control them, and therefore if there's a bad
> binary all we can do is try to fix whatever is causing the misbuild and
> tell you to rebuild whatever package is problematic.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the response.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Richard Cobbe | 2 Jan 21:07
Favicon

http://www.finkproject.org/

I'm getting some really weird results from the package search function on
http://www.finkproject.org/.

I'm trying to see if there are any available updates to svn-client.  (I'm
running fink 0.28.6 and tracking unstable source on MacOS 10.5, intel.)  So
I went to http://www.finkproject.org/, clicked on the "packages" link in
the left sidebar, entered "svn-client" in the box, hit Submit.

The immediate result makes sense; it lists a bunch of packages, including
svn-client, whose latest version is 1.5.4-2 (which is what I'm currently
running).

However, when I click on the package name to bring up the page with details
about that specific package, I get very strange results; screenshot
attached.  I'm deeply suspicious about two things: first, why does the
title of the page say "svn-client-0.33.1-1" and not "svn-client" or
"svn-client-1.5.4-2"?  And second, why doesn't the chart list 1.5.4-2 as
being available in unstable?

Am I misinterpreting these results?  Or is there something strange with the
program that produces them?  Or is it really the case that the version of
svn-client available for 10.4 is more recent than that for 10.5?

Deeply confused,

Richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |

Gmane