headers
dan | 1 Jan 2004 14:59

Re: grcodes

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 09:46:29 -0500 (EST),
"Daniel M. Bikel" <dbikel <at> linc.cis.upenn.edu> wrote:

> Hi, I've brought this up before, but has anyone noticed odd
> errors when compiling the texmf package from scratch on Panther
> (i.e., doing a 'fink install texmf')?  Specifically, the
> grcodes.tex file is causing a slew of problems.

I'm running Jaguar (10.2.8), and just updated to gcc3, and didn't
notice anything odd about tetex when I updated it.

> It would be *extremely* helpful if someone could post their
> version of that file so I could compare it with mine.

I don't know much about TeX's internals, but I can certainly do
that!  Is the attached attachment okay?

FWIW:

    /sw/share/texmf/omega/lambda/omegabook/grcodes.tex:
              MD2: bc4da18b49d42c04e2280a386e5843a3
              MD4: 74bbea030ce0a21e3b8b3a800d03f641
              MD5: 69fc4923005a52702300aa4ac55a8150
             MDC2: ed2bca50e970dd0537aa60e0886cda85
        RIPEMD160: 66ef6508d48bd9fd64e64dec1f62a4f283477e27
              SHA: c1c34bea849fac24dcf41ee75bb3e43477cd3754
             SHA1: e956087d7e0bb741143ce1f8f6764304f76c2363

HTH,
Dan
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Tom Harris | 1 Jan 2004 19:33
Picon
Favicon

Tetex

Looks like this is not a new topic to the group, but I'm still unable 
to understand or solve the problem.

I am trying to install gnucash without compiling everything so I am 
trying to install as many dependencies with apt-get as possible.

Here are the "additional packages" mentioned by fink (which, along the 
way says, "WARNING: While resolving dependency "date-manip-pm560" for 
package "date-manip-pm-5.42a-10", package "date-manip-pm560" was not 
found."):

  audiofile audiofile-bin audiofile-shlibs bonobo bonobo-dev 
bonobo-shlibs
  compress-zlib-pm compress-zlib-pm560 control-center-dev
  control-center-shlibs date-manip-pm date-manip-pm581 db3 db3-shlibs
  digest-md5-pm docbook-dsssl-nwalsh docbook-dtd docbook-xsl doxygen 
esound
  esound-bin esound-common esound-shlibs expat expat-shlibs file-spec-pm
  finance-quote-pm finance-quotehist-pm g-wrap g-wrap-dev g-wrap-shlibs 
gal19
  gal19-shlibs gal21 gal21-shlibs gawk gconf gconf-dev gconf-shlibs gdbm
  gdbm-shlibs gdbm3 gdbm3-shlibs gdk-pixbuf gdk-pixbuf-shlibs ghostscript
  ghostscript-fonts giflib giflib-bin giflib-shlibs glib glib-shlibs 
glibwww
  glibwww-shlibs gmp gmp-shlibs gnome-core gnome-core-dev 
gnome-core-shlibs
  gnome-libs gnome-libs-dev gnome-libs-shlibs gnome-mime-data gnome-print
  gnome-print-dev gnome-print-shlibs gnome-vfs gnome-vfs-dev 
gnome-vfs-shlibs
  gnumeric graphviz gtk+ gtk+-data gtk+-shlibs gtk-doc gtkhtml-dev
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Remi Mommsen | 1 Jan 2004 19:45
Picon
Picon

Re: Tetex

Hi Tom,

On Jan 1, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Tom Harris wrote:

> Looks like this is not a new topic to the group, but I'm still unable 
> to understand or solve the problem.
>
> I am trying to install gnucash without compiling everything so I am 
> trying to install as many dependencies with apt-get as possible.
>
> Here are the "additional packages" mentioned by fink (which, along the 
> way says, "WARNING: While resolving dependency "date-manip-pm560" for 
> package "date-manip-pm-5.42a-10", package "date-manip-pm560" was not 
> found."):
>
>  audiofile audiofile-bin audiofile-shlibs bonobo bonobo-dev 
> bonobo-shlibs
>  compress-zlib-pm compress-zlib-pm560 control-center-dev
>  control-center-shlibs date-manip-pm date-manip-pm581 db3 db3-shlibs
>  digest-md5-pm docbook-dsssl-nwalsh docbook-dtd docbook-xsl doxygen 
> esound
>  esound-bin esound-common esound-shlibs expat expat-shlibs file-spec-pm
>  finance-quote-pm finance-quotehist-pm g-wrap g-wrap-dev g-wrap-shlibs 
> gal19
>  gal19-shlibs gal21 gal21-shlibs gawk gconf gconf-dev gconf-shlibs gdbm
>  gdbm-shlibs gdbm3 gdbm3-shlibs gdk-pixbuf gdk-pixbuf-shlibs 
> ghostscript
>  ghostscript-fonts giflib giflib-bin giflib-shlibs glib glib-shlibs 
> glibwww
>  glibwww-shlibs gmp gmp-shlibs gnome-core gnome-core-dev
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Bart Silverstrim | 1 Jan 2004 23:43
Gravatar

dia

While trying to compile dia on a 10.3.2 system (fink -V gives
package manager version 0.17.4
distribution manager 0.6.2.cvs
)
I received the following errors; can anyone advise?
******
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. 
-DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""/sw/share/locale"\"        
	-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"Echo\"					-I../.. 					-DORBIT2=1 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 
-I/sw/include/libxml2 -I/sw/include    -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include  
-O3 -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -c Bonobo_Sample_Echo-common.c
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. 
-DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""/sw/share/locale"\"        
	-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"Echo\"					-I../.. 					-DORBIT2=1 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 
-I/sw/include/libxml2 -I/sw/include    -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include  
-O3 -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -c Bonobo_Sample_Echo-skels.c
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. 
-DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""/sw/share/locale"\"        
	-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"Echo\"					-I../.. 					-DORBIT2=1 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 
-I/sw/include/libxml2 -I/sw/include    -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include  
-O3 -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -c Bonobo_Sample_Echo-stubs.c
rm -f libEcho.a
ar cru libEcho.a Bonobo_Sample_Echo-common.o Bonobo_Sample_Echo-skels.o 
Bonobo_Sample_Echo-stubs.o
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Stephen Trowell | 2 Jan 2004 12:31
Picon
Picon
Favicon

fink fails to unpack file

I have recently installed Fink and Fink Commander under MacOSX 10.3.2 
(Xcode 1.1; Apple X11) and used it to install GIMP (awesome) and 
gperiodic.

However, now whenever I try to install ANY fink package - and I have 
tried several - I get an error message of this type (the example is 
from an attempted update to fink itself).

### execution of gzip failed, exit code 139
Unpacking the file fink-0.17.1.tar.gz of package fink-0.17.1-1 failed. 
The
most likely cause for this is a corrupted or incomplete download. Do 
you want
to delete the tarball and download it again? [Y/n]
Failed: unpacking file fink-0.17.1.tar.gz of package fink-0.17.1-1 
failed

If I respond Y the same failure repeats

With some files there is mention of a segmentation error.

When I went to the terminal and ran the same command I got the 
following error

~% gzip -dc /sw/src/fink-0.17.1.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xvf-
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

I am not sure what happened to cause this problem. I haven't been able 
to find anything relevant (or that I can identify as relevant) and I 
would appreciate help.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Martin Costabel | 2 Jan 2004 12:55
Picon

Re: fink fails to unpack file

Stephen Trowell wrote:
[]
> ~% gzip -dc /sw/src/fink-0.17.1.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xvf-
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)

If you repeat this with /usr/bin/tar instead of /sw/bin/tar, do you get 
the same result? And with /sw/bin/gzip vs /usr/bin/gzip?

--

-- 
Martin

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Tom Harris | 2 Jan 2004 13:36
Picon
Favicon

Re: Tetex

Thanks Remi,

Checking around, tetex is not installed anywhere else on the system. 
Interestingly, system-tetex was a dependency of doxygen as I tried to 
install it from binary. I think this might be a bug. Why it is calling 
for system-tetex instead of installing tetex I can't figure out.

Again (in more detail), this is what happens when I try to install 
doxygen:
---------------------------------
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following extra packages will be installed:
   fileutils graphviz system-tetex tcltk tcltk-dev tcltk-shlibs
The following NEW packages will be installed:
   doxygen fileutils graphviz system-tetex tcltk tcltk-dev tcltk-shlibs
0 packages upgraded, 7 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3  not upgraded.
Need to get 11.0MB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.3/release/main fileutils 4.1-3 
[1285kB]
Get:2 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.3/release/main system-tetex 
20010808-12 [2566B]
Get:3 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.3/release/main tcltk-shlibs 
8.4.1-2 [815kB]
Get:4 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.3/release/main tcltk-dev 8.4.1-2 
[928kB]
Get:5 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.3/release/main tcltk 8.4.1-2 
[954kB]
Get:6 http://us.dl.sourceforge.net 10.3/release/main graphviz 1.8.5-4
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Stephen Trowell | 2 Jan 2004 14:23
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: fink fails to unpack file

Martin,

On 02/01/2004, at 10:55 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:

> Stephen Trowell wrote:
> []
> > ~% gzip -dc /sw/src/fink-0.17.1.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xvf-
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> If you repeat this with /usr/bin/tar instead of /sw/bin/tar, do you get
> the same result?

Diiferent result, I presume this means the unpacking worked:

[Stephen-Trowells-Computer:~] stephent% gzip -dc 
/sw/src/fink-0.17.1.tar.gz | /usr/bin/tar -xvf-
fink-0.17.1/
fink-0.17.1/10.1/
fink-0.17.1/10.1/apt-0.5.4-4.info
fink-0.17.1/10.1/apt-0.5.4-4.patch
fink-0.17.1/10.1/base-files-1.6-1.info
fink-0.17.1/10.1/bzip2-1.0.2-1.info
fink-0.17.1/10.1/bzip2-1.0.2-1.patch
fink-0.17.1/10.1/bzip2-dev-1.0.2-1.info
fink-0.17.1/10.1/ChangeLog
fink-0.17.1/10.1/debianutils-1.16-1.info
fink-0.17.1/10.1/debianutils-1.16-1.patch
fink-0.17.1/10.1/dpkg-1.9.20-1.patch
fink-0.17.1/10.1/dpkg-1.9.20-3.info
fink-0.17.1/10.1/dpkg-1.9.20-3.patch
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
David R. Morrison | 2 Jan 2004 14:32
Favicon

Re: Tetex

I suggest "sudo apt-get install tetex".

The apt-get program is accepting system-tetex as a valid alternative to
tetex, without realizing that you won't be able to install it.  It
probably chooses system-tetex over tetex because s comes before t.

  -- Dave

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Martin Costabel | 2 Jan 2004 15:00
Picon

Re: fink fails to unpack file

Stephen Trowell wrote:

> Martin,
> 
> On 02/01/2004, at 10:55 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> 
>     Stephen Trowell wrote:
>     []
>      > ~% gzip -dc /sw/src/fink-0.17.1.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xvf-
>      > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> 
>     If you repeat this with /usr/bin/tar instead of /sw/bin/tar, do you get
>     the same result?
> 
> 
> Different result, I presume this means the unpacking worked:

It seems clear now that your /sw/bin/tar is rotten. I would suggest to 
remove it, "sudo mv /sw/bin/tar /sw/bin/tar_rotten", and then "fink 
rebuild tar". Maybe "fink reinstall gettext" for good measure (since we 
don't know where the problem comes from, a little voodoo may help :-) ).

--

-- 
Martin

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane